Six years ago I heard strange story of strange Mr Bessler, who most strange called himself Orffyreus and who was told having build great wheel - which run without energy input and even lifted weights, officially stated by honourable men, 300 hundred years ago. He liked to make mystery about his invention, covered his wheel and locked it, so nobody ever could look into inner miracle - like some today´s inventors also behave rather strange.
That Bessler would be respected man also at today´s ´stingy-is-randy-society´ because really egoist. He asked hundred thousand Talers for his invention, nobody besides Russian Zar Peter I could and would offer. Bad luck for both as Zar died before deal was perfect. Bessler hold out further twenty years, well provided officer of Duke Karl of Hessen-Kassel, however did never find potential buyer and persistently he took his secret with him into the grave.
Bad luck for egoistical Bessler: today unknown or considered not credible like any perpetuum mobile in history. Only some hundred or thousand naive ´spinner´ around globe still believe his wheel did work - against all experiences and versus all ´prohibitions of valid physical laws´.
Total Spinner
I confess being naive spinner. For months I made researches about that problem. There are lots of records at Web concerning Bessler alias Orffyreus, thousands of proposals for solving Bessler-Secrete and hundreds of - mostly incapable - models for prove of that perpetuum mobile. I did not study all these records nor all workouts of other researches. I wanted - as often - not being bound to previous knowledge but to think about ´free´ by myself.
At many chapters I discussed that problem and made dozen of proposals, e.g. by chapters ´Bessler and Swivel-Arm-Wheel´ or ´Mechanic Gravity-Motor´, ´Falling within Wheel´ and ´Fall-Curves within Wheel´, ´Pendulum-Control´ and ´Bessler-Pendulum´, ´Besssler-Wheel´ and ´Bessler-Leverarm-Wheel´ up to ´Bessler-Problem solved´ or ´Original Bessler-Wheel´. All these considerations were valuable studies - however admittedly most incapable to absolutely wrong - like naive men´s results of working logically are. Nevertheless, real naive spinner must go on and on searching solutions. Learning is bound to mistakes - or did anybody learn anything not by mistakes? So I claim not to produce statements increasingly foolish.
Pendulum-Problem
This picture EV GM 240 shows two well known contemporary engravings of Bessler wheels. At left side, wheel is shown once by side view and once by frontal view. Wheel by itself only shows outer hull, however most impressive is that strange pendulum (arms are marked blue, three weights are marked green). This pendulum mechanism is rarely discussed in literature, however I wanted to investigate its function and made up diverse analyses about (see previous mentioned chapters).
Normal pendulum swings by known laws. Bessler however fixed upside cross-beam with weights at both ends. So pendulum becomes sluggish and remains longer times at each ´dead point´, swings back by delay. Pendulum mechanism is connected with system shaft via rod and handle. So shaft could resp. should not turn steady.
Conspicuous at this picture (and at many other original drawings too) is that ´tamper-unit´ (left, marked red), where time-shifted four pestles are lifted and fall down again (e.g. for milling grain). This tamper-mill thus also weights system not steady but interruptedly by four strokes.
Most strange seem diverse pictures, where drive is organised by ´edged gears´, e.g. at this ´Archimedes-Snail´ (right, marked yellow), by which Bessler pumped up water in order to demonstrate performance of his wheel. This genius handcraft was clockmaker and did know well how to produce round movements or how to construct cable winches. This ´jerky belt-drive´ thus was constructed intentional. This belt is guided via four edges, thus wheel is weighted unsteady, again by four strokes.
Increased Turning-Momentum
At previous chapter Gravitymotor with variable spokes was shown by EV GM 227, intermediate increased load can generate increased turning momentum. Here at picture EV GM 241 once more is shown, thereby rotor (RO) moves little bit ahead of rotor-arm (RT), i.e. rotor pulls ahead rotor-arm stronger. Angles come up between system axis (SA), spoke-bearings (SL) and rotor-bearing (RL) and this bended line becomes stretched when weighted, rotor-arm is accelerates and delay is compensated.
Bessler did not use rings as effective masses (WM) but separated weights. If these weights were mounted any kind elastic (e.g. at flexible rods), this delay by intermediate increased load resulted likely effect (here e.g. marked by double arrow at flexible rotor spoke RS).
Load changes by strokes, at any case, makes only sense if inside of machine some constructional elements can move relative to each other, can swing some ahead and back again. Following picture EV GM 242 schematic sketches mental development to expedient constructions.
Constructional Elements
At A a pendulum is drawn, by which weight (green) can swing to and fro - practically like a kid at swing. Actually this bearing is stabile and without drive this weight will finally rest at its downmost position. Dangerous labile situation only comes up, if kid stands up at seat.
At B this labile status schematic is shown. At hanging swing now stands upright ´pendulum´. If e.g. support swings to right side, green mass falls down left side. At C this construction with two pendulum arms and two joints is drawn simplified.
At D now is sketched (in smaller scale), many swings resp. pendulum arms are arranged at circle, in order to make this process continuous. Upside these constructional elements were called rotor-arm (RT) and spoke (SP). Spoke is to bear turnable within rotor-arm (RT), here called spoke-bearing (SL). Outer end of spoke must show any support for effective mass (like seat of previous swing), here called spoke-bolt (SB).
Effective mass (green) weights resp. ´balances´ upside of downside support. Mass now needs also diverse ´legs´ (resp. previous pendulum arms), at least ´virtual´, because only each downside standing leg becomes real support (at D marked by red line and red dotted lines). By jerky turning of system shaft, e.g. falling of effective mass out of labile status is initiated.
At previous proposals of solutions, this standing pendulum arm really is only ´virtual´, like sketched at E. This constructional element here is called rotor (RO) in general and generally it is ring-shaped. Only by that shape is achieved, centre of weights is positioned relative high within machine and thus great instability of high level comes up. Rotor never comes direct in contact with system shaft, however can turn resp. swing around inner elements which control process. At this rotor-ring are to install bearings (RL) for taking previous spoke-bolt (SB).
At F assembly of rotor-arm (RT) and spokes (SP) and this rotor-ring (RO) are drawn. Certain room to move (BS) between rotor and rotor-arm is marked by arrows into radial and tangential directions. Here momentary rotor hangs resp. pressed at spoke left side down, all other spokes take no weight.
At G this picture is completed as now also effective mass (WM) is drawn outside of inner rotor-ring (RO) and both rings are connected via rotor-spokes (RS). Changes of weight at central gear occur really by ´strokes´, changes of movements of inert mass at long radius however are more calm, especially if rotor-spokes (RS) are some flexible. At centre again this central ´gear´ is drawn, however spokes (SP) are drawn simply as lines between rotor-arm (RT) and rotor (RO).
Decisive Element
Bessler probably did use these constructional elements in principle, even these elements can be realized by most different techniques. Bessler achieved by outer pendulum mechanism, system shaft did not turn steady. At the other hand, he took forces off system only by strokes, so shaft did turn faster and slower from phase to phase. So he managed his wheel to turn continuously and same time to take workload.
As mentioned, Bessler did build not only one wheel but diverse wheels for years. Thus he probably tested previous diverse variations of constructional elements, different modes of supports and arrangements of weights and variety of processes for controlling movements. Certainly he also detected previous ´trick´ of bended force-lines, by which falling weights don´t impact only radial direction (with no effect), but angles between lever arms become stretched with acceleration-effect.
Bessler did build also wheels without outer pendulum mechanism, so probably achieved effect e.g. by spokes of different lengths (like discussed at some variations of previous chapter). However it´s also to assume, Bessler detected decisive constructional element resp. criteria for using gravity in general. It´s reported he got first idea for perpetuum mobile when looking at turning spit - and I suggest sucking pig was not speared really concentric.
Previous system becomes really round running and working effective only if previous arrangement of elements of this picture are installed eccentric to system shaft. So additional and decisive element is drawn at G: system axis (SA) as system shaft and all other elements turning around. Rotor-arm (RT) must be firmly fixed at system shaft, however eccentric to system axis resp. at least these spoke-bearings (SL) must be arranged eccentric to system axis (SA), thus concentric to eccentric axis (EA).
Static and dynamic Unbalance
At the beginning, Bessler (like probably most researchers today) did search for static unbalance (previous sucking pig at spit). Obviously he mounted weights flexible and by uneven turning of system shaft he achieved turning momentum (what today´s researcher did not manage, probably because bound in thinking by steady turning). However, only acceleration of rotor axis versus gravity results addition / subtraction of inertia and gravity forces and thus dynamic unbalance.
Also this lifting and lowering of rotor is to realize by diverse techniques (see previous considerations to spokes of different lengths). However, only if prerequisites for usage of gravity and demanded functions are represented by each dedicated constructional element, machine can work at its best. Bessler did achieve this result resp. at least sufficiently working machines - while by today´s knowledge and techniques easy could be build machines really optimum shape.
Take the Wraps off
Bessler never revealed his secrete. Contemporary visitors could not detect reasons. Afterward, Bessler was called incredible - and / or all progresses of techniques could not result similar solutions.
In the meantime, mankind probably made no progress in spiritual affairs. At the other hand there are some mental subjects with some progresses (e.g. coming up of ´esotericism´ and interests in spiritual questions in western countries) and potentials were (re-) discovered - which even can lift secrets. For example, techniques of Remote Viewing allow to look at events far away or long time ago - even of future. Bessler probably had no idea his secrete was not hidden for future men, who mentally visit his workshop and even look into his machines.
I say sorry to Bessler for disturbance, I was involved with. At the other hand I took care, ´spooky disturbance´ occurred only once and spying was not done by all available possibilities. I did not want to learn all about Bessler´s tricks, because I think we have to do our jobs by ourselves, technical like mental. Occasional looking into past might be allowed, inquisitiveness in secrets of future, especially concerning private future, might hardly be accepted or even make no sense or will show negative consequences.
Minutes of Past
I described my adventures and experiences and (false) interpretations in 2001 at Remote Viewing und 2003 once more in Visiting Bessler - and theses chapters might still be worth reading and reflecting. In context to momentary considerations I want to repeat some sections. Probably some readers might detect similarities to previous texts. Underlined texts are literary quotes of records of ´daydreaming´ viewers (concerning techniques and evaluations see previous mentioned chapters).
Viewers express feelings and also mind contributes its judgements (however strictly differed). A viewer e.g. noticed slacking falling got lost soft and judges that to be naturally. Afterward follows powerfull cutting energic like steal hard and this would be artificial. It would concern movement energy flux returning of natural source. He feels up and down endless uneven changing hard and soft or returning resumption flowing weaker becoming harder supported and this would be similar to natural, above this his mind states to have no idea about.
An other viewer e.g. adds light increasing with back-curve sharp leftsided, afterwards uneven back-bended to left hard, followed by opening to right change of direction running ahead dynamically lively symmetric and lastly towards ahead then snap-off structure until end disappears into floor.
A third viewer states hooked begin S-shaped towards down soft, then upward diagonal to right upside small bow narrow back to left soft and a concept / idea / spiritual sense is present. An other viewer names soft and hard up and down swinging upwards with a bend until around an edge softly downward falling slinging back and ahead like slow-motion as first impressions.
All viewers talk about shape of movements. To one viewer it seems coming from upside stop some airy diagonal dip into motion´s direction some rounded sits down dips in a surface / ground softly bended, which makes impression of silent as if calming occurs.
On the other side he tells about motion coming from upside with following circle movement of some solid stuff as if no weight, on the other hand of some soft and at raising direction of movement he points out warm heat.
An other viewer looks at parts like snappy squared like metal and a movement at the beginning hesitant and cushioned accelerated movement downwards, then cutted movement rattling, afterwards slow motion backward related to time. Within a round box he points out essential is time in motion runs ahead fast then slowly back.
This viewer here also gives precise description of parts (box upside right, hard to read): spokes screws bands of metal partly also wood complex and filigree very mobile. Then he states different movements must be coordinated well, in order to achieve effect wanted while wanted effect is movement within time.
In the middle of this picture he draws large thing turns into different directions like 2 wheels connected at the centre 1) left to right 2) upward and down. In the centre (marked by arrow from left side up) he marks drive switch cable, which at other sheets he also calls head / "intelligence / control".
Corresponding to tasks, viewer produces clear considerations: centric arranged alignment central function small, local movement source centre origin generator movement activity.
Further on he mentions (at the middle): ahead / back movement square small parts restless motions, then describes (left side down) a square part dark rubber-like block solid even surface relative light (like pen) 5-6 cm long moving without guidance.
This viewer again points out (downside right): cooperation of all parts fine adjusted regular concept in total is basis. At an other sheet, again he draws this seven-arm star, at the centre however some more soft parts. There he mentions concerning function: production essential (life-), there will result something and concerning knowledge: it is known however background is not known, lastly he notes concerning ahead-back movements: high level law is basic, no autonomous movements, motion of a part alone doesn´t make sense, only in total it will make sense, parts don´t touch each other.
About ´snappy part´ he remarks snappy probably will mean hesitating approach, cutted command or strong pressure onto metal hard + square + dark like there from would come commands. That ´big thing´ thereby should be controlled, logically his mind explains this would be like an Ufo.
This viewer, obviously, got off into other regions - while next sheet again exactly he describes wheels including one the other. Analogue to this, an other viewer describes control unit as large as a TV assembled of different parts makes go in and out.
One viewer shows relationship at a level rather abstract: target for him will mean energy based on natural soft techniques without harmful substance, not by (combustion or destroying ?) of natural materia. He assumes concept of intentional doing, like put a stamp on, sign, achieving relation to something other and he calls shape of energy light fine-matter white-yellow-good. He notes concerning time past + future, hard to capture for us, from somewhere else, "time-shifted".
This viewer summarizes: First impression: natural, many elements with artificial parts, within the target there is an area concentrically arranged, there is motion controlled by high-level plan, recognizable, interesting stuff occurs inside, it´s small solid and compact, parts of are flexible, there is a concentric motion of small parts, parts are square blocks of 5-6 cm length. By the movements steadily results something, environment and that behind is not known, not to touch (very complex), controlling environment looks dangerous.
One viewer described engine like this: many pipes and connecting rods, slippery, exact, are many, rattling, bended pick, final part, lance-shaped. To process of movements viewer remarks: free fall, ahead, bended falling, spiral, downside got more narrow, disappears, redirect better direction, upward sharp rising, redirection, very aimed, sharp limited, snappy.
Difficult to interpret: short chaotic phase, order by impulse probably by change of contact to part, flash-quick, light falling-through? Part B comes after part A, cause A can keep contact only for some time.
An other viewer described energy as bounded to air/height, ´like wind floats and glides´, seconds-fast (realtime), like slow motion for me (other time) and movement coming from upside on the other hand circled, can go through stone.
He describes also motion of falling left side form upside, stop, some ´airy´, sloped diving in.. And once again: movement from upside with following circled motion, however not falling down, but dipping into some soft, what is not stone floor, hard earth. And once again: some rounded, sitting down, as if not weighting.
Third viewer sees control unit, large like television set, assembled by diverse parts, controlling opening mechanism, lets in and out. He describes some pulsation, would like go out, on the other hand pulled in, is shifted again, resulting of is mass-growth.
This process of movements is repeated by next viewer: at start hesitant + braked, movement downward, goes fast ahead then slowly back, like by slow motion and he points out is urgent! and once more when certain point is achieved, time runs backward like slow motion, thus stretched/bended, is decisive factor, without bended time project is not to realize.
So it´s question, what´s bended or stretched, time or movement´s track. Motions however could be much slower than expected, so appearing like slow motion. Several times he points out, that´s urgent and decisive.
When I wrote these RV-Chapters in 2001 and 2003, I could not understand nor was interested in central control, large like TV, with many parts, moving inward / outward and one following next, coming in contact and can not keep contact for long time, because my designs of that time did not work with any central control. Now situation has changed somehow as previous discussed ´rotor-spoke-gears´ seem to be really similar to Bessler Wheel.
General and Comprehensive
At my website, I did not want presenting only inventions of machines, but all times I intended to point out general principles and general effects. Now by these chapters I probably defined basic principle, prerequisites and general technical design for usage of gravity by pure mechanic tools.
These experiences of Remote viewing, ´incidental´ in combination with Bessler problems, were also of most general nature for me - that´s why I mentioned this subject here once more. If ´shadow´ of real events are present for hundreds of years, intensive enough for total normal people to track down - then these occurrences must leave its traces totally material kind: within ether.
For me it´s totally clear, all physical occurrences (materia, forces, ´fields´) are only vortices within substance of ether. However also any mental-spiritual occurrence can not only be pure abstract stuff, but are (finer) vortices within same medium. All these ´swinging motions´ overlay by great variety, everything is bound to anything absolutely direct - because only ether as one ´material´ substance really exists - plus its most different motion´s pattern. Remote Viewing works - and if planed machines will function and descriptions of viewer fit to these constructions - then this pure ´mental´ viewing is as real as any physical reality of machines.
Ether
I already described some of these considerations at ´Ether-Physics´ and I have still to work for years. Here I want to mention only some aspects concerning gravity and inertia:
Real existing is only ether-substance, which is in steady swinging mode whole over universe (multiple overlaying circled motions). Near celestial bodies symmetry of swinging motions is disturbed (e.g. by ´shadow of earth´), swinging becomes some ´hit´. Just like no water is running ahead at forward roaring sea-waves (but water is nearby stationary and only turning by circles, however upside faster ahead and downside slower back), just similar ´gravity-waves´ are rolling versus earth - however not ether by itself is falling down but only its motion pattern shows previous asymmetric hit (each at centre of ´motion-pipes´).
There is not materia at the one hand and ether at the other hand and ether ´penetrating´ materia, there is nothing besides ether and its motions. Materia and material bodies are vortices of ether within ether. Asymmetric gravity-vortices press materia-vortices downward. So at lever-arms or e.g. previous rotor-arm-spokes results occurrence of gravity-weight resp. ´heavy mass´.
Materia does not end at its surface, but its vortices influence ether also wide around this kernel. If material body is pushed to move forward, its vortices-structure wanders through ether (which is nearby stationary) and much wider area of surrounding ether is involved. Ether is gapless and not elastic, i.e. any change of motions within demands corresponding motion´s changes all around. That´s occurrence of inertia, of ´inert mass´.
So nearby earth, universal motion pattern of ether is ´deformed´ by gravity-asymmetry, and materia in motion deforms its surrounding ether. If both are added e.g. by upward guided masses, both additional components of vortices neutralize mutually or reduce occurrence of weighty and inert mass. These bodies e.g. show less ´net-weight´ at lever-arms.
When mass is moving downward, ´impressions´ of gravity and inertia add mutually. If this body e.g. is delayed by lever-arm or forced into other direction, these ether-vortices resist versus changes of movement by much stronger forces, thus increased ´gross-weight´.
Energy and Force
There is no ´energy´, because energy is only empty abstract collective noun. Energy lastly and all times can only be real movement of and within real ether. Energy becomes force, whenever ether-movements of one vortices system affects to other vortices system. Movements of vortices systems can be organized that kind, one ´shape of energy´ (i.e. certain motions pattern) is transferred into other shape (like at common applications). Indeed, forces can be neutralized resp. can affect versus each other, so only heat remains (like normal losses of common applications).
Forces however are also to organize that kind, secondary effect comes up (here previous supporting- resp. counter-forces) which serve for certain benefit (resulting turning momentum) - without disturbing existence or forward movement of primary working ether vortex. This is done here at the one hand by combination of motion´s pattern of gravity with pattern of inertia, so both add or subtract to more or less energy of two masses. At the other hand, counter-forces are not directed frontal towards these two masses of different forces, but counter-forces affect aside of (near mutual axis).
Naturally these machines produce no additional energy as total of energy lastly is constant all times (however only if ether is assumed as gapless substance because only that substance can move lossless). Gravity forces are ´for free´. Rotating masses affect inertia ´for free´ (after once being started). Lifting and lowering results different forces - which are not drawn off system directly, but only counter-forces of redirection of movements are used outside system and only partial so masses go on rotating and inertia goes on working and gravity naturally goes on working.
Four Mysteries
At this chapter are mixed four different mysteries. Bessler´s mystery will not last for ever and just these last chapters show decisive hints for rebuilding his machines.
Remote Viewing was useful to detect Bessler-mystery, remote viewing by itself however is still mysterious for most people. These techniques work and sufficient approves of successful and correct views are documented. However it´s still not totally clear which ´mystery´ allows that ´viewing far away´. For me it´s absolutely clear, this can not be simply ´pure mental abstract stuff´, but demands ´pure mechanic-material basis´. Mechanic movements of constructional elements must have left trails, ´hard´ enough to be tracked down hundreds years later - however also feelings of people gathered there left distinct trails (which even clearer are sharper are tracked down). These trails can keep only within a ´loss-free working medium´ - within omnipresent ether.
Scientists do hard in lifting this secrete, because still thinking by parts and searching truth by even smaller particles - finding lastly nothing else than movements. Motion demands medium which moves. One needs not many different media, one unique medium is absolutely sufficient. ´Everything is made of One´ - simple statement of nearby all old world-views - however long way to go for those who still believe there is materia at the one hand and just nothing at the other hand. However, if mystery of true essence of ether is lifted, consequences are far reaching.
Fourth secrete - at least this very moment - for me still is, perpetuum mobile described upside will really work. Probably finally or at least much better by techniques of ´Gravitymotor with double-joint´ of next but one chapter. Before however I will point out an approval for usage of gravity plus rotation by DePalmas Spinning-Ball-Experiments of next chapter.
Evert / 07.04.2006
| Energy by Gravity-Forces | Menu | Index / Sitemap |