At end of 2005 Andrey Nikolaevich Burenkov from Odessa send me a workout and asked for checking resp. publishing at web. This script Generator of condensed type (GCT) inklusive drawings thus here is available (in English, file ´eft820b.pdf´, 520 KB, 8 pages). Burenkov describes a conception based at two condensors of variable capacities and makes up calculations, which e.g. result performance of 65 kW. He asks for criticism (e.g. via email at my address, see starting page of this website quit downside).
Burenkovs conception is very interesting for me as it´s similar to considerations I published by chapters Electrostatic-Electricitygenerator, Elektrostatische Feld-Generatoren (sorry, only in German) and Electric-Dynamo and also at chapter Ether-Energy-Generator. So I am very interested how specialists view Burenkovs calculations. At the following I describe essential elements of this conception with some comments and some additional proposals.
Basic Elements
At picture EV DKG 01 schematic are shown diverse constructional elements. Within housing (GE, German Gehäuse) radially are arranged 60 plates of connective material in shape of segments with space between of same size (thus each 3 degrees plate and space between). At A simplified are drawn only ten of these plates (dark blue). These plates are charged negative (e.g. by 3000 V) and thus here are called negative plates (NP). These plates are connected via conductive wires (NV, German Verbindung).
At this picture at B schematic is shown how analogue positive plates (PP) are arranged at a rotor (RO), again all plates connected by conductive wire (PV). Negative and positive plates are positioned opposite each other, so practically representing a condensor.
At C schematic is sketched cross-sectional view at longitudinal axis. For reasons of symmetry, positive plates (PP, red) are installed at both sides of a disc of rotor (RO) and negative plates (NP, blue) correspondingly left and right side at housing (GE). All positive and negative plates again are connected via conductive wires (PV resp. NV), so condensor is build by 240 plates in total (resp. here only by 40 plates).
Besides this constructional assembly (left side at C) now at same axis is installed second corresponding assembly (right side at C). Both rotor discs are fix installed at shaft, however shifted by one phase (by previous 3 degrees resp. here by 18 degrees). So if e.g. left side negative and positive plates are congruent positioned, corresponding plates of right side will be positioned at different positions.
By turning of rotor thus plates will cover each other by varying size, like e.g. at D covering by halves. Practically these assemblies represent two condensors with alternating high and low capacities.
Motion Processes
At picture EV DKG 02 previous cross-sectional view is drawn with some additional elements.
Rotor shaft is driven by electric motor (EM). Negative high voltage (NH) charges negative plates (NP) via negative wire (NV) when starting machine (and at running mode losses are reloaded). Positive high voltage (PH) is guided via shaft to positive wire (PV), so positive plates (PP) are charged (here sketched only schematic).
By turning of rotor, capacities of condensors vary alternating. Balancing flow between positive plates is guided via wires (red) nearby shaft (and not used other kind).
Balancing flow of negative charge is guided via negative connective wires (NV) as primary coil (PS, German Spule) through transformer (TR). Alternating flow (AC) is induced within secondary coil (SS), which is available for external consumers.
Burenkov describes this conception in details by his script and calculated all data - and asks for criticism of his promising results.
Swinging Flow between Condensors
Burenkov points out function of transformer between both capacities of condensors. For demonstration of these effects, at picture EV DKG 03 left side schematic are shown two capacity surfaces (K1 and K2), connected via transformer (TR). At rows of left column are sketched five phases of shifting charges.
If K1 shows stronger charge (dark blue) and K2 shows weaker charge (light blue), differences of voltages exist, resulting balancing of charges. Afterwards, both capacities show likely average charges (middle blue), like left downside is marked. This status is achieved if both capacities are connected directly by wire and also if resistance is included (e.g. in shape of this transformer).
However, charges do not simply flow from left to right side, but charges ´slop´ some to and fro, thus at the beginning more than exact half of charges are flowing towards right side. And just this ´over-slopping´ essentially is enforced by ´inertia´ of transformer (resp. by flow induced within secondary coil). At rows left side this process (of fading swinging movements) is marked by different blue colours.
This effect well known at simple capacity surfaces once more is stronger between surfaces of alternating capacities. Varying capacities of previous variable condensors (K3 and K4) are represented by circled surfaces of different size at this picture at right column.
At previous process, differences of voltages (see different blue colours left side) were balanced. Here however such differences hardly exist, but charges correspond all times to available surfaces (so right side blue colour of all surfaces is likely). Flow between surfaces is not caused by voltage differences, but primary by (mechanical) change of size of available surfaces (here practically parts of condensor plates covering each other).
If maximum covered surface (by turning rotor) is reduced, there comes up (relative) over-saturation and thus really some difference of voltages comes up. Flow running off surface of decreasing size however flows to other surface offering likely increasing size and thus sufficient capacity. So flow is not limited by half of given charges but practically all available charges completely will move to other capacity surface without resistance.
Previous inertia of involved transformer thus results much more ´slopping-over´, so already at the end of phase new difference of voltages come up for starting next phase.
Alternative Variations
At picture EV DKG 04 this construction once more is shown. Capacities of condensor K1 and K2 can be changed by differing distances between plates (PP and NP). Instead of linear movement, Burenkov uses turning movement of positive plates in order to vary capacity of each condensor. At both cases, forces will affect when plates become more close or far to each other. Burenkov did calculate also these forces and asks for checking his results.
However I am convinced, much less forces will come up (here effecting turning of rotor), if both condensor plates would be installed stationary within housing and only a dielectricum (DI) would be moved between plates, like schematic shown at K3 and K4. Instead of Lorentz-forces there will affect only Coulomb-forces.
Burenkov proposes, stator like rotor should be build by dielectric material resp. at least spaces between plates should show layers of dielectricum. Based on this construction he calculated voltages between stator and rotor. However I rather think, his way of calculations would better fit to that constellation K3 / K4 (dielectricum between negative and positive plates at one phase and only air between at other phase).
At Burenkovs conception is also remarkable, flow of positive charges are not used. Anyway, I don´t know what to do with term of ´positive charges´ (because in my understanding there can exist only more or less - negative - charges, see previous mentioned chapters). So I think, positive side of this circuit is without any importance. Result of that consideration is much simpler conception, like sketched schematic by K5 and K6 of previous picture.
Dielectricum-Condensor
Picture EV DKG 05 schematic shows that version with dielectricum between condensor-plates (thus like previous K3 / K4 - constellation). At disc of rotor (RO) are mounted plates of dielectricum (DI) at each side, shape and number corresponding to negative plates (NP) and positive plates (PP), which both now are stationary installed within housing.
Positive plates again are connected via wire (PV, red), between condensor of left and right side. This wire is connected with external ´positive´ high voltage (PH, green).
Negative plates of left and right condensor are connected by wire (NV, blue), which also is connected with external negative high voltage (NH, green), however only for starting and reloading losses. Connection of negative condensor-plates is guided into transformer (TR) as primary coil (PS), in order to achieve previous side-effect (of over-slopping) and main-effect of generating alternating current (AC) for external consumers.
Burenkov used 240 plates in total for his calculations (while here would be used only 120 plates, however that constructional assembly could be installed twice). Burenkov used rotor with radius of some 30 cm, which naturally can drive only limited revolutions because of centrifugal forces.
So it would be rather advantageous to build machine of same performance by much smaller constructional volume. This could be done when using previous simple conception with only negative capacity surfaces, more or less covered by dielectricum, like sketched at upside picture EV DKG 04 by K5 and K6.
Cylinder shaped Alternative
Much more compact and driving much more revolutions would allow construction with cylinder shaped arrangement of effective surfaces, like e.g. schematic shown at picture EV DKG 06.
Within cylinder shaped housing (GE) five negative plates (NP, blue) are installed stationary with spaces between correspondingly. Rotor (RO, red) is build star-like and at its outer sides are installed five times layers of dielectricum (DI, yellow). As rotor is turning around system axis (SA), different covering between plates and dielectricum comes up, thus varying capacities of plates.
This picture left side shows cross-sectional view through longitudinal axis of system at phase of high capacity (e.g. at K1), while right side of picture low capacity exists (e.g. at K6). Via connecting wire (NV) between both constructional assemblies (e.g. between K1 and K6) thus wanted flow of charges comes up.
Optimum shape of Flows
Each do-it-yourselfer can ´screw together´ electric circuits at home or apparatus and it will work anyway. Proper handymen however build ´proper´ connections, because electrons ´fly off´ at any sharp edges or peaks. This happens e.g. here at slopping to and fro of charges between capacity surfaces, where well could come up over-saturation. Indeed, protection is most important problem at any electrostatic machine.
I am convinced, current never ever flows through conductor by electrons, but practically exclusively alongside surface of conductors. Sphere shaped ´free´ electrons only appear, if parts of charge are pushed off into Free Ether. Charge by itself however is a ´coat´ of special ether movement, which is pressed towards surface of conductor or around round conductors. This pattern of ether motions (charge) can also show motions impulse alongside conductor - then it´s called current (details see previous mentioned chapters).
In order to keep flow free of additional disturbing ´vortices´, surfaces of conductors should be smooth at its best, especially at transitions of different constructional elements. This shall be demonstrated at example of that strange ´onion-like´ negative plate (NP) of previous picture.
Onion-shaped Capacity Surfaces
At picture EV DKG 07 at A is shown cross-sectional view of that onion-shaped negative plate (NP). It is partly covered by dielectricum (DI) of rotor.
Charge-coat exists at all surfaces of this constructional element and all connected conductors, in shape of that layer of special ether movements. These relative coarse movements are pressed against surfaces by finer swinging movements of Free Ether, everywhere same kind, thus everywhere that layer is likely thick. This equal spreading of charges, by common understanding is explained by rejection forces of like negative electrons - however this can not be true explanation.
At areas of covering dielectricum, this ether pressure is reduced, i.e. within gap between plate and dielectricum this layer is much more thick (marked by dark blue). Pressure onto free parts of surface shifts that movements pattern into that protected gap. By common understanding, within that gap thus should be more electrons, next to each other, thus would reject each other much stronger - strange enough.
If now at A dielectricum moves upward, downside of plate free surface becomes larger. Previous thick layer of charge is pressed flat and backward (here downwards) around that onion back into negative connecting wire (NV). Charge will take this way (marked by arrow) because that impression of motion ahead at this side runs easier than through ´thick coat´ which still exists at still protected part of surface (this act of ´pressing-flat´ by itself results previous mentioned impulse for moving charges alongside surface of conductors).
Corresponding are movements at following phase, at which increasingly larger parts of surfaces become covered by dielectricum, like schematic shown at B. Layer between dielectricum and plate already is filled up at area of already existing protection (here downside). So more charge can flow into gap only from upside (marked by arrow) as protection wanders upward.
Thus charge moves from connecting wire around that ´onion´, alongside protected negative surface, and same direction further on at next phase, back to connecting wire. Naturally all edges should be smooth. By previous mentioned ´over-slopping´ comes up problem of over-saturation, which is reduced essentially by this shape of capacity surface. Surplus of charge practically runs around that onion and is pressed back into connecting wire (thus losses by radiation of ´free electrons´ is reduced essentially).
At this picture at C is shown, this flow would be best at square basic surface. Multiple of these elements could well be installed side by side. At this picture at D once more is shown cross-sectional view, where e.g. two of these charge-elements are positioned opposite to dielectricum.
Naturally transition from this constructional element to connective wire must be smooth, so these flows are not disturbed. That wire should be relative thick (optimum with square cross section and rounded edges) and that wire should reach direct to corresponding ´onion´ resp. capacity surface of other side of machine. Above this, all connecting wires should be of same length.
Parallel-Coil
At picture EV DKG 08 schematic is shown a transformer - however of special kind. Here is drawn a wire (green) as secondary windings and its ends are marked by AC. Connecting wires between all corresponding capacity surfaces (of left to right side of machine) should not be connected with each other, but each wire should be one winding of primary coil, e.g. reaching from K1 to K6, K2 to K7 etc.
Effect of that kind of winding is, charges of all wires enter parallel into transformer and thus build one parallel running broad ´wave´. Between these primary wires thus also at secondary wire is induced parallel flow.
At common windings, this wave practically comes up only at actual front of charge movement alongside of one wire. There it becomes ´narrow´ for ether movements, there comes up unnecessary high layer, versus which Free Ether builds up corresponding high resistance. Opposite, at these parallel windings, flow at secondary wire is build up at all parts same time, i.e. with much less resistance much stronger flow is generated.
This parallel flow at all parts of secondary coil, at end of a phase naturally back-affects still charge flow within primary coil, i.e. giving capacity surface is ´sucked empty´ and taking capacity surface is ´over saturated´ correspondingly.
This wide-spread flow lastly ends and at change of phase will transform likely wide into opposite direction, practically by parallel turning around same time at all surfaces, without additional bad vortices. At normal windings however, peak of opposite running flow alongside of that single wire must ´plough-up´ total field - with corresponding resistance. At these parallel windings thus no high voltage peaks will come up (with rather low volume of flow, like mostly at applications of electrostatic units), but here move large volumes of charge by relative low voltages.
Previous drawing shows only schematic principle of that parallel winding. Essential is, primary coil exists of many separated wires, between each secondary conductors are winded. However also secondary coil could be build by corresponding number of separated wires. Primary winding e.g. could build a flat bundle of 25 wires and aside each one of 25 wires as secondary coil are winded (and finally their ends are connected outside of transformer coil into direction of consumer).
To many readers probably this strange transformer like previous strange onion will appear really strange and not important, because there are lots of transformers and condensors working well. Nevertheless I will point out, there are well known electronic constructional elements, which show rather strange behaviour if included within certain circuits. Above this there are many inventors who build running machines, especially by electronic or electrostatic elements - and nobody was able to rebuild likely machines (and I am sure because any element or wire or connection was not really like the original).
What I want to point out: common constructional parts should not only be used by their abstract function and formulas, but it must be paid attention to real background processes. Electric appearances occur within ether and ether is one homogenous substance without separated particles, thus every movement within ether affects movements of neighbouring areas, where induction is best example for, thus that previous parallel movements are most effective within ether - and machines should be build best fitting to ethers behaviour.
Swinging-Circuit-Generator
At picture EV DKG 09 schematic is shown cross-sectional view at longitudinal axis of that machine. Within housing (GE) rotor (RO) is beard, driven by an electric motor (EM). Rotor is shaped star-like (like shown at upside picture EV DKG 06) and at its outer surfaces are installed layers of dielectricum (DI).
At position shown here left side, surfaces of dielectricum are positioned opposite to capacity surfaces of previous negative plates (NP), while at right side of machine these ´onions´ are not opposite of dielectricum (based on shifted ´star´ of rotor). Actual differing charges of each capacity surface are marked by dark resp. light blue.
Every single capacity surface left side is directly connected with corresponding surface right side via connecting wires (NV, blue) and these wires are of same length. Within transformer, these wires build primary coil (PS, like described upside), while within secondary coil (SS) alternating current (AC) is generated for external consumer (green, naturally also to transform into DC, e.g. for charging battery). At start of machine, all surfaces are charged by external negative high voltage (NH), which at running mode only has to reload losses of charges.
When rotor for example shows diameter of 15 cm, previous five plates with edge-length of some 5 cm can be installed. When machine is some 60 cm long, ten square plates one aside next can be installed. Effective capacity surface thus will be 1250 scm in total (10 * 5 * 25 scm), i.e. there are two halves of each 625 scm. Total surface of all ´onions´ and all connecting wires might be 10.000 scm.
At this total square-meter everywhere is charge same ´thickness´. At position shown however, at these surfaces protected by dielectricum of 625 scm will exist charges ten or hundred or thousand times - depending at dielectricum used and distance of gap. Theoretical values might be achieved in real machines only by half - however this additional amount of charge at effective surface of 625 scm is available for shifting to and fro.
This current is produced by pressure of Free Ether onto movements structure resp. layer of charge. Turning movement of rotor is not cause but only trigger for work done by ether, while rotor causes only changing protection of capacity surfaces. Energy input for turning rotor will be only small part of induced current.
Amount of current depends on revolutions. This compact rotor well could drive e.g. 6.000 rpm, so each second by 100 revolutions, each 10 times current impulse is induced within transformer, thus 1.000 impulses are produced each second.
Surface of 625 scm is like that of normal paper sheet. Maximum charge at corresponding conductor surface, protected by dielectricum, is shifted by ether 3.600.000 times each hour. How much kWh ether thus performs at this machine, practically by now costs? When Burenkovs way of calculations are adapted to that application, corresponding results will show.
On the other hand, if assuming common plus- and minus-poles, whole rotor could operate as positive pole (charged by positive high voltage). Star-like cross-section results gap of air between positive and negative plates by alternating distances (like K1 and K2 of previous picture EV DKG 04). If at outside sections of rotor a layer of dielectricum is installed, positive plates inclusive their dielectricum protection move alongside negative plates. At least for these versions, specialists could theoretical caculate all datas by known formula.
Outlook
Andrey Burenkov would like to get criticism to his conception and especially to calculations of his script, upside available for download. I would like to learn what specialists say concerning my additional hints and proposals for improvements, last but not least which results calculations concerning previous Swinging-Circuit-Generator would show. We both express thanks for help in advance.
I want to remark, this conception naturally will not be final solution. I think this arrangement again could be trigger for building up swinging motions of much more charges at much more condensors, e.g. in order to affect condensor-cascade (like e.g. used by Hyde or Testatika, see previous mentioned chapters). Also for these further steps I would welcome hints and criticism of readers. I hope these considerations are interesting for co-operations, co-thinking and co-searching for successful solutions.
Evert / 17.12.2005
| Appendix Perpetuum Mobile | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |