At earlier chapter Wheels at Tracks moved essential basics of diverse kind of movements and diverse kind of wheels were descirbed. At previous chapter Doublestar-Motor was described, how centrifugal forces - normally worthless - are usable by directing into turning sense of system, especially by unbalanced wheels.
Finally there at Firewheel-Motor was worked out, wheels without spokes are effective, where effective mass in shape of backwards showing arms are used.
There are crop circle pictures since years, showing three rings of different diameters. Rings touch one another, mostly shifted by some 90 degrees. Even this motive did come several times and I did try hard, I couldn´t make out any sense of these pictures.
At previos chapter was stated, centrifugal forces are compensated by tension of material of spokes like of material of rim. At previous Firewheel-Motor a ´wheel´ without rim was used, so effects of centrifugal forces are isolated within spokes. Logically consequent now is to check out opposite idea, i.e. to analyse centrifugal forces only at rim. Objectives of this chapter thus are to design a motor existing only of ´spokeless´ wheels (so only by rings).
As starting basis, this beautifull crop circle of 1992 will serve (interesting story of this picture is documented by diverse books concerning crop circles). At EV RRM 02 elements of this picture schematically are shown.
Small circle surface here is named system shaft (SW, German Systemwelle). Around this shafts are arranged an inner Ring (IR), a middle Ring (MR) and an outer ring (AR, German Außenring).
Outer and inner diameters look like to be dimensioned each in relation of three to four. So if these elements inside would be gear rims and outside would be gear wheels, transmission relation of 27 to 64 would result. At other pictures other relations are shown, e.g. one to two in total.
Remarkable at this picture (like at others) is, besides system shaft there is no other axis drawn (solely rings). Theoretical axis show each some 90 degrees angles, however with different distances between. More is not to read of pictures. So, the whole point exclusively must be based on rings resp. their movments.
Flying Wheels
At mentioned chapter ´Wheels at Tracks moved´, beside others is decribed, why wheel broken off lorry jumps ahead and overtakes car. This matter of fact, here briefly is discussed once more, cause essential elements of movements and power effects of free turning wheels are also relevant at rings above.
At EV RRM 03 right side (at A) is shown a wheel, rolling ahead (to left) on supporting surface. There are marked four points of masses (M1 to M4) and by arrows are marked their directions of movements in principle.
Axis of wheel and same time whole wheel moves ahead. Mass point (M1) downside near surface stands still within space, mass point (M2) backside is accelerated upwards-ahead, mass point (M3) upside shows double speed in horicontal direction, mass point (M4) again is pressed downwards and delayed.
Changes of speeds and directions of each mass point is forced onto wheel, by car´s masses weighting at axis and by its friction at surface. If wheel could move free, it would resist versus all these steady changes. Just this happens e.g. when wheel is broken off its bearings.
At this free frying wheel (B) e.g. mass upside no longer is forced to change its movement´s direction downwards. As upside masses predominantly show largest kinetic energy, inertia of these upper masses pull whole wheel forwards. All mass points will stronger move ahead on account of wheel´s rotation. Also mass downside e.g. no longer is forced to stand still, but is allowed to fly ahead, behind masses more upside ahead. Well known result is, rotation is transfered into translation.
This broken lorry-wheel (C) now lastly will fall down, touching again supporting surface. Based at its strong movement ahead, it is braked down rather hard. However, only masses downside are blocked to stand still, all masses further upside ´stumple´ over ahead. So this wheel again comes to fast rotation around its axis, corresponding to its meanwhile increased movement ahead, wheel shows faster turning speed as at the beginning (rational speed like a wheel would show, moving ahead by this accelerated translational speed).
As wheel no longer is guided and pressed down by weights at its axis, mass parts upside by their strong accelerated movements, now again will pull up and away downside masses. Whole broken wheel thus jumps ahead lorry, each time faster and faster - like truckers often told that ´foolish´ story.
Essential result of these conciderations is, maximum accelerated parts of mass at free turning wheel, most hard resist versus any changes of speed and its direction. As consequence, whole wheel is flying into direction of strongest inertia. Pulling direction is not exactely horicontal resp. tangential to (here) upmost mass (cause also this mass already would be redirected resp. forced into horicontal direction), but pulling force is directed some upward-ahead.
Bottomless Rolling
Now these conciderations are to transfere at above system of including rings. At EV RRM 04 at A, at first both inside elements are shown, system shaft (SW) and inner ring (IR). This arrangement shows above corp circle picture mirrored (in order to get turnings counter clock-wise, like commonly assumed at these chapters) and shifted a little bit (so ring seems to hang by its weight at system shaft - whereby real rotor systems prevailingly work by vertical axis).
When system shaft is started turning, mass left side at ring is thrown downside. This acceleration into falling (resp. into outward movement) demands only few input of power. Downside, mass becomes most fast and shows correspondingly high amount of inertia forces (T1). As discussed above, mass there wants to go on flying tangentially. At this large radius, mass best can stay by swinging around supporting point like pendulum.
By this arrangement here (opposite to horicontal supporting surface above), there is no plane ground to hinder this (pendulum) movement. Ring here indeed can swing around system shaft, cause its supporting point can roll alongside circle of system shaft.
So outer mass will swing around system axis, back upwards, without demanding corresponding input of power. Like at diffferent previous chapters here results, mass climbs up to higher level (resp. onto shorter radius) by its own kinetic rotational energy, resp. mass is moving ahead of general turning speed by own drive (exactely by own inertia).
Best coordination of turning movements of both elements would be given, if system shaft is build as gear wheel and ring inside is build as gear rim. On the other hand, that swinging-ahead would be done more steady at plane (but circled round) surfaces. So if both surfaces would be made with rubber, round swinging like transfere of forces by friction probably are done well. Probably also teeths-surfaces and plane surfaces could be combined.
This effect of swinging-ahead resp. this tangential inertia force (opposite to supporting point of ring), once more is to use by next both elmentes. At B thereto is drawn inner ring (IR) and middle ring (MR). Supporting point is shifted some 90 degrees (to left, compared with above constellation), thus corresponding strong inertia (T2) here shows upwards.
At C analog arrangement is shown by middle ring (MR) and outer ring (AR), again shifted some 90 degrees, so strong inertia (T3) now shows to left side. If these three arrangements are included one within the other, effective inertia forces show around system shaft, into turning sense of system.
Basic Construction
At EV RRM 05 these four elements by constellation above are integrated: system shaft (SW), inner eing (IR), middle ring (MR) and outer ring (AR). Inertia forces (T1 to T3) above with corresponding directions are marked by arrows.
All elements are turning counter clock-wise, from inside to outside by slower speeds, corresponding to each transmission relation. Also three inertia forces, each effecting mass to want to swing ahead, affect into turning sense of system.
As soon system shaft is started turning, effect described will come up at inner ring - however, rest of arrangement would ´fly off´, i.e. middle and outer ring would move to most outside positions, to possible longest radius in direction of system shaft. Thus constructional elments must be kept together within that arrangement, right angled to each other.
That´s not marked at crop circle picture of ´Three Rings´, nevertheless at other pictures, resp. I took outer element of ´Halfmoon´-pictures for this purpose. Around middle system of system shaft and three rings, thereto an excentric ring is arranged, called rotor arm (RT, German Rotorträger, like commonly here used term for this functional element).
Within round drilling of rotor arm (RT), outer ring can turn. This drilling is excentric to system axis. Outer circumference of rotor arm (RT) is concentric to system axis, i.e. rotor arm (RT) is turnably around system axis.
By this picture upside, schematically is shown cross-sectional view of Ringwheel-Motor, below longitudinal cross-sectional view through system axis. Drive (AN, German Antrieb) is done by system shaft, output (AB, German Abtrieb) of surplus power is done at hollow shaft of rotor arm (RT). Both shafts naturally are beared turnably within housing (GE, German Gehäuse). Naturally several modules like this, correspondingly shifted, could be arranged within motor.
Going round Unbalancy
All effective masses are arranged concentric in shape of rings, so there is no unbalancy by excentric masses at rotor. Unbalancy however comes up, cause turning point is excentric to whole ring masses. These wheels are not guided by any central axis, only at system axis is installed system shaft.
Cause all masses turn within turning movement, all masses move at spiral tracks. All rings, based on each strongest inertia force, want to swing around each supporting point, into direction of maximum kinetic energy, into direction ahead. So rings pull around its turning point next smaller ring into turning sense of system (by teeths connection, each some 90 degrees shifted backwards resp. by friction there).
Lastly outer ring transferes this turning momentums onto rotor arm (RT). There accumulate all effective inertia forces to thrust momentum (T4) as a whole, affecting at sloped surface (at this picture left upside), thus at large radius to system axis, thus at good lever arm.
There finally redirection of all masses affects (while without embedding rings within rotor arm (RT), centrifugal forces of all masses would affect at most large radius, radially to system axis). True working effect of this design thus again is, delayed (here shifted backwards) redirection of masses into circled tracks (like also descirbed at some other chapters here).
Constructional Variations
In principle, rings could be places loose within this arrangement. Outer ring is guided by rotor arm (RT). Middle and inner ring however could move free, so at stopped status rings could glide to other positions. Also at starting phase or at acceleration within running modus, is no guarantee rings keep its positions. In running modus however, rings will come to wanted positions automatically. Nevertheless, to guarantee demanded constellation, ´distance-keeping´ constructional elements should be installed.
These could be elements, completely filling up sickle-shaped space between rings. This function could also be served by elements some smaller, like here (only once, as an example) is drawn by distance-element (DE), e.g. each guided within slots going round. Elements mustn´t keep maximum distance, so e.g. an elastic element could be included. Anyway, technicans will know best constructional element for function demanded.
Also different kind of surfaces are to use corresponding to technical requirements. Outer ring must be beared glideable within rotor arm (RT), thus must show round good gliding surface outside. Pressure of outer ring onto its bearing within rotor arm (RT) however could also be transfered by ball-bearing or roller-bearings etc., like e.g. is marked at EV RRM 07. Roller (R1) downside keeps outer ring excentrical to system axis. Roller (R2) right upside takes centrifugal forces radially to system axis. Roller (R3) left upside takes effective inertia forces resp. pushes inside masses.
Other surfaces could be round, so forces are transfered by friction, probably by rubber-surfaces. These surfaces on the other hand could be build as gear rims and gear wheels, probably also combined with round rolling surfaces.
Strange enough, relation of transmission doesn´t matter at this system. Also, there could be installed only two or even four rings. So mass and diameters of rings are rather free to dimension.
However important is, maximum pulling effect will exist, when axis show angles to each other some less than 90 degrees (like flying wheel above shows affecting inertia already before horicontal direction, thus into direction some upward-ahead).
So there are many constructional variations possible and constructional. It´s only decisive, unbalancy going around is achieved, no matter by which technical variation. Based on simple lever arm effects, experts easily will find optimum relations by these principles.
Message
For some readers, probably would be interesting task to check this crop circle picture resp. to ´guess´ message (before I describe my impression).
For years, I was occupied by some crop circle pictures, but finally last weeks I really got true conclusions (e.g. especially at previous both chapters). Long times, I wanted to read out complete constructional drawings, however often missing decisive details. Crop circles seems to use certain ´languages´ with special symbols (and by literture is reported about astonishing ´correspondences´, books easy to find within web).
Lastly I made essential progress by combination of messages of different corp circles, which however mostly came same time. So I am happy, now I had success in producing fitting concept - at least for me - to pictures with three rings.
Just as I had finished drawings of this chapter, a colleague send me hints to some new circles, one of showing this impressive picture of last August (small points within are visitors). As I understand, message is: ´Guys, got it finally?! You must turn rings excentrically around shaft and rings will run ahead turning by itselt. At long last, start turning right way.´
To some readers, stupid speculation this might seem, other readers might have found similar interpretation. At any case there is question: who makes crop circles? Answer is clear: hoaxer. There are estimates about 20 to 80 percent to be hoax, differing by years. There remains question: who made circles undoubtly true, by firm evidence? Who isn´t interested in this subject and my answer at all, please pass oven next two sections - but please do read ´Unbalancy Exercise´.
Materia and Spirit
There is only one single real existing matter, ether, undividable, gapless. This ether moves swinging within itself. Not at all, all kinds of movements are possible, cause every movement must be resonant to others.
Extremely limited are movements of relative large scale. That´s why there are only these few chemical elements (most of can only ´survive´ by keeping close together with others, building molecules), there is electromagnetic radiation, also charges or gravity. Anyway, what´s countable, weightable or measurable as physical or chemical occurances, that´s most small part, cause coarse part of all movement´s possibilities.
For suptle movement´s structures however, unlimited possibilities exist, by unlimited overlays (thus uncomparably more complex than e.g. sinus swinging) unlimited ´spiritual units´ can come up. However, at no time any part really is isolated to next (like there are no really bordered material elements existant).
Spiritual ´units´ are at all places and times same time (cause their ´frequence´ within whole universe is existant unfaded), nevertheless these units can locally appeare concentrated (within corresponding ´resonance-box´). Above this, some ´spirit´ for some time (one life long) sometimes will incarnate into material body (e.g. looking like man, but materia alone never ever is identic to that human being as a whole).
So we are ´this-siders´, but most prefere to be ´over-there´, cause free from material limitations. Voluntarily, spiritual individuals go into material borders only for checking out coarse stuff once more, especially to approve soul (connection between spirit and materia) by coarse occurances like between people. Some decide to do a special job.
This-side existance naturally only makes sense, if total knowledge about what´s what of over-there existance one can´t take with, if together with material limitations also spiritual abilities radically are reduced (are faded out while this-side´s life). So only some remember vaguely their true existance - as suptle part of ether´s movements. Prevailingly this-siders are occupied with handling coarse material parts. For this-siders won´t waste lifetime in total, colleagues over-there some times - by strange coincidence - give some hints, remembring at originally objecitives or planed job. Some times, hints e.g. are done by crop circle pictures, especially if many this-siders are involved.
As really everything exists of that only one matter, there is no break of mediums, it´s all in one. Naturally it´s most easy for ´spirit´ to manipulate its own medium (as naturally as we ´manipulate materia). In prinziple, there is only to build up corresponding resonance-box (some may call it astral-body or aura). This-siders then may get impression of materia changed (like bended stalks of crop) or of something materia-like (like Ufos e.g.) or like an ´idea´ did fall into resonance-box named brain (and this-sider has to re-flect hard by its stupide reduced ability).
Believing and Knowing
Naturally everyone is free to believe or to know or to believe to know as he likes it. Nevertheless it makes difference to believe what´s primary: spirit or materia (if one can´t believe, there is only that One all existing of).
For materialists logically exists only materia - perhaps surrounded by any ´mysteric´ mist. It only counts what´s countable or weightable or measurable and this functions all times well, result is named. Nevertheless - essence behind this (empty) word, no scientist can figure out by its instruments (at best by ´nebulous´ mystic might trans-figure).
For materialists logically whether universe nore live can have inherent sense, probalbly besides biologic developement. So one must look for beeing best and mighty by accumulating material values (cause, consequently, there are no other values), so logically by unscrupulous exploiding others. What´s later or even what´s about environment, naturally doesn´t matter at all. Obvisiously this logic of egoism at the moment globally booms.
If opposite, spiritual existence is looked at to be primary, this-side live makes sense only by mental and spiritual developement. That´s not to achieve by each alone, but only by cooperating with co-humans like co-envirenment. Then respect and goodwill serves welfare of whole community, spiritual existances this-side and other-side. Ethic attitude of altruism is logic consequence - logically based at right understanding of self-interest.
Again, everybody is free to believe, which kind of developement makes more sense in his understanding. At any case however results, by handlings or even by thoughts we all determine mental and spiritual environment - and pure materialists may think about, whether material stuff around him or persons around him are of essential value. It should be easy to conclude where focus of interests to put, which kind of mystic mist is worth to clear up.
Next I´ll put my focus to attempt, to clear up why and how all undividably is connected by mutual medium of ether, to explain by rational conciderations, probably plausible for both sides of world view. I trust in friends of other-side sending hints and ideas.
Now this chapter became strange mix-up of conciderations about simple technology and speculations about philosophy. Nevertheless, that´s the point, cause never ever one side can exist without other. Concentrating closely only to one side, never may show good results. Now however, some final remarks to mechanical stuff discussed above.
Unbalancy Exercise
Here problems are some simple mechanical processes, nevertheless objectives naturally are to produce clean energy for better environement, Free Energy really free available for all.
Scientists and technicans simply have to solve this exercise of unbalancy:
1. Inertia and centrifugal forces at rotating systems are to produce withount problems, where resulting forces are much stronger than power demanded for keeping up turnings (only for compensation of friction).
2. Normally centrifugal forces affect radially and compensate at concentric axis, thus one must use excentric masses or masses are to guide at not concentric tracks, so asymmetry of power effects comes up.
3. Process of movements may not only concentrically turn around one axis, but same time must turn around several axis, so effective differences of inertia and / or centrifugal forces are directed tangentially to system shaft.
I hope, this picture and conciderations above, but also these of previous chapters, offers sufficient clues. Rest of workload has to be done by concerned experts.
Only that case, any expert still can´t ´believe´: make experiment of broken lorry-wheel in labratory exactely. Pay attension to fact, wheel falling at road will affect thrust onto road. Bend (clumbsy) road to circle and let fly wheel within. Thust on ´road´ could be braked out, without decelerating rotation of wheel (opposite, wheel flys faster in relation to road). Technicans will find out, instead of large-scale road building, much finer solutions - by principles above.
Only that case, any expert asks for energy-constance: closed system is not that wheel, but wheel plus road. Road moves relative to wheel hitting onto road, thus road hitting wheel. At tennis it´s probably called ´top-spin´ hit. Energy bilance is equal only when contribution of road is included.
This counter-force is wasted (hit onto fix road is turning momentum at axis of earth) or this ´road´ is to install at shorter radius around shaft easier to turn. Then one can brake out that surplus turning momentum, e.g. pulling magnet through coils of second system in order to produce useful electric flux. This contribution of ´barrier´ to see as usable energy, that´s what I re-claimed by diverse chapters of this website.
Each bad designed or wrong loaded washing-machine wanders through washing house (resp. is to keep on its place). Design washing-machines thus ´wrong´ and load it thus ´bad´, machine is walking at circle (so this turning momentum is to brake out of system).
Each combustion motor with crank shaft shakes terribly. Only by expensive additional weights or shafts etc. motor is to ´immobilize´. Design crank shaft that ´wrong´ and hang on additional masses that ´un-fortunately´, construct will show unbalancy momentum into circled directions. More than five parts moved won´t be demanded, more power-input than for compensation of friction will not be neccessary, inherent urge for rotation however is to diminish only by strong energy - earnings.
By these final remarks I finally will end my contributions to rotor systems. I hope others pick up ideas und build ´unbalanced´ motors.
Evert / 17.10.2002
| Appendix Perpetuum Mobile | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |