At earlier chapter Wheels at Tracks moved power effects are discussed at wheel guided by axis or wheel moving free, at resting track or track moved, at even track or round track, at concentric track or excentric track. Diverse effects are worked out, e.g. is explained why a broken wheel overtakes the car by jumping ahead.
At Rhönrad-Motor is used a free turning wheel within excentrically turning track, so effective masses are accelerated and decelerated. Together with gravity results, mass partly runs ahead of general turning, thus driving track ahead and momentum is given, usable outside of system.
At previous chapter Moon-Motor and Tide-Power-Station this concept was transfered onto rotor systems with exclusive usage of inertia. By example of tides, affected by moon, essential effects were explained. On the one hand, movable masses (like water of sea) are important, on the other hand a special central gear, by which forces can affect at lever arms. Relativly braking of movements within this system is to use as drive within a second system, like chapter Perpetuum Mobile Third Kind briefly descirbes these principles.
Now at this chapter here, essential elements of doublestar systems (like earth-moon) resp. mechancal models of that system, once more are descirbed precisely. Some more variations of constructions are presented as examples.
Objectives of this chapter however also are, consciously installed un-balancy to use most direct manner. All mechanicans are busy to eliminate unbalancy and its disastrous follows for machines. Here is presented ´lever-arm´ by which these enormous forces are to ´cultivate´ and usable momentum is achieved.
Elements of Doublestar-Systems
At EV DSM 01 elements of doublestar-motor schematically are shown. There is a rotor (RO, green, analog to earth), which concentrically turns around its rotor axis (RA). All turning movements here are asumed counter clock-wise. All masses of this rotor turn with same angles speed, however different speed within space, according to their radius towards rotor axis. Also watermasses of ses (M1 and M2, blue) move that kind, e.g. on both sides of earth same speed (like marked by green arrows).
Doublestar systems also walk within space, thereby turning in addition around a common turning point (center of both masses). Here, that total system is marked by circled surface of rotor arm. This rotor arm has a drilling excentrical, within which rotor is beared turnably (so excenter axis (EA) is located at same place like rotor axis (RA)). ´Thick´ side (here right side) of rotor arm (RT, German Rotorträgers, grey, analog moon) represents mass of moon. Rotor arm (RT) turns around common axis, which here is called system axis (SA).
So turning movement around rotor axis now are added by turning movement of all masses around system axis. Masses around system axis also turn by constant angles speed. Based on differing radius to system axis, now however parts of masses move by differing speed within space.
Here, turning movement around system axis is marked by grey arrows at both masses (M1 and M2). At ´moon-side´ masses will show lower speed than masses at opposite side. Simplifying here is assumed, both angles-speeds are same amount (but that´s not neccessary).
By turnings, parts of mass come to positions with changing radius to system axis, i.e. are decelerated and accelerated again. All masses resist versus any change of speed within space. Mass outside (left) won´t be accelerated, mass inside (right) wants to fly further on by same speed.
If masses at rotor are movable, like e.g. water of sea, mass will run ahead of rotor´s turning at moon-side (like high tide with its forward running wave). At opposite side, mass will stay back (like smaller high tide, cause waters of wave are rolling backwards).
Shifting turning Momentum
At doublestar systems, inertia of masses versus changing of speed does result, outer mass (at opposite side of trabant, here left) within space will function as ´fix´ point, around which inner mass (showing towards trabant, here right) will swing. Thereby, inner mass also will press back rotor axis and same time system axis (back into turning sense, so here upwards).
Naturally, that point (left) not really is fix in space. Rotor mass (M1) there will still go on turning around its own rotor axis. This component of total turning is unchanged. Other component of turning now however will no longer turn completely around system axis. By this outer ´fix´ point, realy turning point of system axis is shifted a little bit towards rotor axis.
Resulting of this is well know effect at doublestar systems: own rotation of star is accelerated on account of rotation like translation of total system. So there is no energy surplus, turning momentum resp. energy of movement ahead of total system (which moves slower), only is transfered to that star (turning faster around its own axis).
If at this star are available movable parts of masses (like water of sea), this might enforce rotation of star, cause high tide might hit onto ´sloped surface´ of coasts. However, also thereby no energy surplus is available, cause within space there is no really ´fix´ point, where forces could affect by lever arm.
Central Gear
However, just this fix point well is to install within a mechanical model of doublestar system, by sensefull gear. Thereto, rotor at its center, concentric to rotor axis, shows a drilling. Inner side of this drilling is made as gear rim (ZK, German Zahnkranz). Around system axis, a shaft is installed, which is made as gear wheel (ZK, German Zahnrad). Both elements are connected by teeths, so a supporting point (AP, German Auflagepunkt) is given.
By this measurement is hindered, inner mass (M2) can shift rotor axis like system axis backwards (here upwards), so acceleration of star´s rotation no longer can result deceleration of system in total. Really turning point of system´s turning thus remains at system axis. Inertia of inner mass (M2) now affects at lever arm around system axis, pressing supporting point (AP) backwards (here towards upside) and pressing rotor axis ahead (here downwards) and affecting aceleration towards outer mass (M1).
Naturally, also by this measurement and work at lever arm, no surplus of energy is achieved. Laws of lever arms are valid absolutely. Nevertheless, additional effect of forces might come up, as masses affect onto ´sloped surface´ mentioned above. Then, centrifugal forces can affect thrust component while long phases of movements, thrust onto rotor and via gear also onto total system. This component of forces continuously would result self-acceleration resp. that surplus of forces via supporting point (AP) is to draw off system by ´brakeing´.
This brakeing may not result stopping of running system, but is only a relative delay of turning movement (corresponding to thrust component above, naturally minus friction). This brakeing can be done by a secundary system, while e.g. there a magnet is pulled through coils, so wanted usage is achieved in shape of electric flux.
Operating Mode
If this mechanical model of doublestar system is started, at first rotor arm (RT) must come up turning (by drive at hollow shaft around system axis, see below), so rotation of total system (analog earth plus moon) is simulated. Shaft around system axis may turn free at this first starting phase. Drive at rotor arm (RT) must also be done at running modus, e.g. for compensation of friction losses. Above this, total system is controlled by input of more or less power.
After rotor arm (RT) is started turning, now rotation of rotor around its own rotor axis (analog to earth) is to simulate. So shaft around system axis must be turned up (faster than rotor arm (RT) is turning). By teeths of gear, rotor is turned (in addition, faster) around rotor axis. Relation of gear wheel and gear rim here is simply two to one, however other relations can be chosen (e.g. see below).
So now effective masses will come to move at spiral tracks with variing radius to system axis, so acceleration and deceleration of speed within space exists. If resulting centrifugal forces could affect versus sloped surface, thrust-component will exist. This force will produce steady self-acceleration of system or while system is running constant, this component of forces could be drawn off system by relative brakeing at system shaft.
Sloped surface
By this gear a supporting point for lever arms is given. However, only effect of centrifugal forces onto sloped surface will result surplus of power usable.
This seems completely impossible, but centrifugal forces are always ´surplus´. At wheel with normal spokes e.g., this force is ´destroyed´. At any normal moved wheel, centrifugal forces effect tension within materia. Centrifugal forces always affect radial to turning point, adding at normal wheel to null. Centrifugal forces are without costs, cause keeping rotor rotating and keeping total system turning demands input of power only for compensation of friction losses. Normally however, these enormous forces, given for free, are not usable, however are usable at sloped surface.
Again is seems completely impossible to keep any mass steady onto a sloped surface. Nevertheless, everyone can demonstrate by simple experiment: take a (most large) bowl (as sloped surface), put a ball (as moveable, effective mass) into that bowl. Hold bowl with arms before body and turn around one´s body´s axis. Ball will take outmost possible position all times, thus turning around turning axis.
Now one must simulate excentrity of spiral track, moving bowl radially towards turning axis and back outwards. Whenever bowl is moved inwards, ball within bowl will roll ahead. Whenever bowl is moved back outside, ball will roll back outwards. When ball is quite outside, one has to move bowl inwards again. Thus ball is positioned ahead of its outmost possible track most time. Thus ball is moving at sloped surface, most time running ahead of general turning. At this example, simulation of spiral track demands input of muscle power, while system mentioned above produces spiral track automatically.
By pressure onto sloped surface, ball produces thrust component. Naturally argument will come up immediately, ball will be decelerated correspondingly, thus has to be accelerated at the following. This is not true, as ball will roll ahead-inside vehement. That´s logic, cause mass at shorter radisu wants to turn higher angels-speed correspondingly, corresponding to energy constance.
But that´s not true at all, cause mass (especially in shape of hollow sphere) can not be looked at to be like one mass-point at bowl´s wall (cause center of ball is high above surface, here more inside). In addition, all mass points of (hollow) spheres (resp. ring-shaped wheel) move with differing speed and into different directions while rolling.
So there will come up ´stumple-effect´ (essential details see chapter ´Wheels at Tracks moved´) with acceleration of movements. Ball´s rotation is accelerated, running on slower track vehemently ahead of general turning (described in details e.g. also at chapter ´Röhnrad´).
Energy-Constance
Even effective mass would be decelerated at inward-phase, mass would transfere energy to rotor, by which at the following, mass is re-accelerated correspondingly. All times however, pressure of mass will weight onto sloped surface, for example, if instead of previous ball a sickle-shaped element is used (see below). Re-acceleration at this sickle is done at its backside end, while center of its mass still is positioned ahead of radial direction (thus thurst component is still given).
By view of energy-constance, this still might seem completely impossible. Indeed, there is no energy earned, but only power effects intermediately are shifted. Backward-showing component (as consequence of thust componente with effect ahead) is transfered to secundary system, by gear mentioned above. Braking down surplus of movements, there e.g. is used for producing electric flux. Law of energy-constance is correct and valid - however not within partly system resp. system defined too narrow, but within complete system (see chapter ´Perpetuum Mobile Third Kind´ with primary and secundary part of system).
Variation Moon-Motor and Tide-Energy-Station
These are not common conciderations, not at all however these are impossible ideas, cause valid law of lever arms only is used by senseful arrangements and cause power and counter-power only are divided into two systems. This concept is not contrary to generally valid constance of all energies. However there is question, how to design sloped surface and shape of effective mass sensefully.
At Moon-Motor of previous chapter was shown, how to deduce optimal shape of sloped surface. There is used effective mass circled bended, which is allowed to move ahead-inwards and back-outwards within a correspondingly shape bearing. Mass thus can run through inner part of track by average speed (moving ahead within slower rotor), keeping this average speed also at outer part of track (while moving back with faster rotor). All times however, centrifugal forces of mass affect versus sloped surface (like previous ball within bowl).
At Tide-Energy-Station of previous chapter, movability of water as effective mass is used. This medium is advanteous, however demands large volumes of constructions. There especially is obvious, how water flows through inner short track by accelerated speed, thus not at all is decelerated (at that part of movement where rotor is decelerated).
In addition, water alongside outer wall is accelerated decisively by suction-effect (based on directed flux moleculare movement becomes essential component of speed, thus really energy-surplus - again, only immediately by constant amout of movement´s energies in total). Also there, water all times affects onto sloped surfaces of turbine-vanes.
Variation Sunwheel
There are many crop circle pictures with sickle-shaped elements, which immediately give impression of dynamic. At chapter Sunwheel-Motor power effects at rotor systems like these are shown, also a Sunwheel with Crank-Disc-Gear is designed.
At EV DSM 02 once more are shown effective masses (blue) in shape of sickles, movable within sickle-shaped bearings of rotor (green). At the center however, now is drawn gear like Moon-Motor. This gear is much simpler to construct, but will function more effective.
Also at this picture, mass right side is at narrow track, while swinging outwards left side, moving backwards within its bearing. If this element (as mentioned above) now would be to re-accelerate, this would be done by pressure of rotor onto backside end of that sickle. However, obviouse to see, center of mass all times stays at position ahead, thus centrifugal forces all times will effect thrust onto rotor.
As different as crop circle pictures show sickle-shaped elements, as different these doublestar-sunwheels are to construct. Effective mass e.g. could be shaped as only one but large sickle, thus in shape of halfmoon, like this animation shows as an example.
Within rotor (dark-green) excentrically is a drilling serving as bearing (light-green) for effective mass (blue). Front part of this bearing represents sloped surface. Within rotor arm (grey), again is an excentric drilling as bearing for rotor.
At this animation, every picture shows rotor arm shifted by 15 degrees, rotor within again is shifted by 15 degrees. So again there is relation one-to-one, so starting position is given after 24 pictures. If one looks at distance of effective mass (blue) to central shaft (black), movements inwards (one turn of mass) and outwards (next turn of mass) is to see.
One also might see, mass falling down right side and following is slinged onto inner track. Mass circles around system axis at rather narrow track, afterwards falling outwards rather free. Relative swinging of mass within bearing is hard to see, there is only impression of un-even swinging (even all movements are totally symmetric).
Variation Halfmoon
At EV DSM 03 this design is shown once more. Upside at A, effctive mass is at its outmost position (far left of system axis). Turning of rotor arm (RT) here is not shown, so ´thick´ side also at B is directed to right side.
There however, effective mass is at its shortest radius to system axis. If mass will move by constant speed also throuh that narrow part of track, it will run ahead general turning movements (here by these relations some 23 degrees), so here mass is positioned already some upside right side.
At several chapters of this website already is discusses, why long-stretched sickle shape is advantageous within movement´s processes. Like at free turning wheel also at these sickles, mass may not be looked at to be concentrated at one mass-point (as theoreticans like for easy concideration and calculation, but at this stuff would produce wrong results). Parts of masses (especially at spiral tracks) move by different speeds into different directions. So sickle elements like this must be looked at to exist at least of two mass-centers, or e.g. can be looked at to be divided into three parts.
Then e.g. at B, front part of effective mass is already at its outward-phase and can fall outwards relativly free, together with moving direction of bearing there. Middle part of sickle is at section of slowest movement of bearing and glides ahead within bearing. Backward end of effective mass finally will come into section of strongest deceleration, thus practically wants to fly ahead its bearing, thus pushing masses infront through its bearing ahead, thus pressing rotor around system axis.
As a whole thus will result, effective mass is running through this narrow part of track without reduction of its absolute speed. Nevertheless, centrifugal forces of middle and backside part pushes onto sloped surface, while front part of effective mass presses much less onto outside-moving wall of bearing.
At this picture at C now longitudinal cross-sectional view through system axis is shown. Within rotor arm (RT) here are drawn two moduls (rotor (RO) plus effective mass (WM, German Wirksame Masse)). Based on compact construction there well could be installed several moduls, naturally shifted correspondingly. Each rotor here e.g. is drawn by two discs (for symmetric bearing of effective mass), each inside is build as gear rim, and teeths are in connection with system shaft, there build as gear wheel.
At running modus, at system shaft output of power (AB, German Abtrieb) by usable turning momentum is to take outside system. Opposite, input of power (AN, German Antrieb) at hollow shaft of rotor arm (RT) is done. System shaft like hollow shaft are beared turnably within a housing (here not drawn.
At this variation of doublestar-motor with its halfmoon-shaped masses, each modul must show a sickle at least 180 degrees long. If sickle is even longer or even ring-shaped (however excentric ring) - then design will look like crop circle picture of ´Threefold Halfmoon (e.g. see Fascinating Crop Circle Pictures or Crop Circle Fotos). Some three years long, I did try to analyse that picture and I made diverse corresponding designs of machines. However, solution above of doublestar-halfmoon probably is best solution.
Crop Circle Pictures
Just last months, this motiv (upside foto) was drawn into crop field, now showing halfmoon-sickle of some 270 degrees. First time, here a small sickle is drawn only half - for me hint of ahead-back-turning. At the other hand, this picture once more points out, excentrity should only be some tenth of diameter.
Some readers may smile about naivity to read usefull hints out of this ´phenomena´. Well, I easy can accept, on the other hand I am rather sure, nearby every viewer having close look at three other fotos, immediately will have impression of turning and dynamic - even here are only some plants decoratively ´arranged´.
These pictures mostly came in 1995, discoverers mostly named pictures as ´Fire-Wheel´ or ´Katharina-Wheel´. One wheel shows five, rather thin arms, other wheel shows six, rather compact arms, third wheel has only four arms (in ´vehement turning´), above this there are many other crop circles of similar beauty and impression.
Just as pictures that kind came often, I did think about long time (in vain), how these wheels really could turn, naturally by itself. All crop circles give informations and hints for problems and possible solutions. However, it would be too ´cheap´, if these informations would be clear in text or direct usable constructional drawings (even more cheap however are common reactions concerning problems like phenomena - and some more).
Within short time, just these firewheels (without any excentrity) came together with pictures of halfmoon-sickles (with pointed excentrity). Both characteristics combined makes solution quite easy.
Before discussing Firewheel-Motor, however some remarks about inertia and mass like some further characteristics of movements above will make sense.
Inertia and Mass
By common ´understanding´, inertia is characteristic of mass, a ´(seemingly) power inherent mass´ and mass - strange enough - again is defined by its characteristics of ´weight and / or inertia´. Also common understanding is, same acceleration / deceleration corresponds to same amount of forces.
Both doesn´t fit: acceleration of mass from stationary status demands high forces, acceleration of mass already in motion demands less forces, acceleration into outward- (or falling-) movement demands even less forces, deceleration however demands most large forces.
Mass is not limited to stable seeming part of materia, but corresponds to total area of its ether-´vortex´. To impress movement ahead onto mass stationary in space demands much power. To impress acceleration or redirection onto mass already moving in space is much easier to do. To stop down whole ´vortex-system inclusive -trail´ requires much more power.
Rotor systems like above build intensive ether-vortice-structures - just like one gets impression of extensive dynamic by crop circles above (and not only see some bend over crop stalks). Detailled description and explanation is documented within Ether-Continuum-Theory of this website. Following conciderations however are based only at pure mechanical movements and effects.
Radius and Angles
In EV DSM 05 at A, once more rotor (RO) is shown, turning around its rotor axis (RA). Effective mass (WM) of rotor is marked at twelve positions while one turn. Mass moves by constant speed, e.g. 30 degrees each time-unit, thus also by constant speed within space.
This turning by itself isn´t interesting. Intresting only is, in combination with additional turning around system axis, mass points come onto variing radius in relation to system axis.
At this picture at B, again constant turning (also 30 degrees each time-unit) is marked, now however around system axis (SA). As effective mass is arranged concentric to rotor axis, mass shows different radius (dotted blue circled track) to system axis.
This means, mass before and behind time-section marked by M1 will show maximum (MA) speed within space (marked by long grey arrow). Opposite, mass before and behind time-section marked by M2 shows minumum (MI) speed within space (marked by shorter grey arrow).
In sections between largest and shortest radius towards system axis, mass is decelerated (resp. affects thrust onto system) or is accelerated (so system demands input of power).
Minimum resp. maximum speed differs by +/- 12.5 percent from average speed, by relations drawn here. Interesting at this picture is also, points more inside of rotor (e.g. M3 and M4) are stronger accelerated / decelerated (here e.g. +/- 25 percent of average speed).
Backwards showing arms
Simple soul, now could take advise by crop circle Firewheels, at rotor sensefully arms have to show backwards. This clue is shown schematically in EV DSM 06.
Situation at A at first is identic to previous picture downside (at B), i.e. positions of mass point (M1) are marked while turning once around system axis, each same time-unit (blue small circles). Analogly also positions of a point further inside (here marked by BP) each time-unit is drawn (look at differing distances between points).
Rotor (RO) here is drawn ring-shaped, practically a rather large dimensioned hub. On that rotor-hub are marked ´fixing-points´ (BP, German Befestigungspunkte), at which a rod (HA, German Hebelarm) is fix installed and rod is showing backwards. At end of rod, effective mass (e.g. at M1) is given. So principle of backwards showing arms is represented.
Remarkable now is, ends of rods no longer are identical to previous positions of effective masses (besides starting position M1), so other process of speed´s variation will exist. By this process indeed, maximum / minimum speeds differ only by some ten percent versus average speed.
By this angled direction of arm, acceleration sector (BS, German Beschleunigungssektor, grey arrow upside) like deceleration section (VS, German Verzögerungssektor, grey arrow downside) is shifted towards backside.
All positions of upper half are at an outwards opening spiral track. There outwards, mass is easy to accelerate. All positions of downward half are at an inward bended spiral track, which becomes increasingly narrow. Inertia of masses resist this movement, by backward directed arms at especially good lever arm.
Effective Leverarm
At position (M2) is marked direction of inertia (TK, German Trägheitskraft). Corresponding fixing point is already some ahead within its strongly decelerated section of track. Actual section of track of mass thus is not parallel to actual section of track of fixing point, but there is an angle between. Mass is not decelerated same kind like its fixing point. So there is an effective lever arm.
Direction of inertia of mass M2 shows parallel to line from rotor axis via system axis towards supporting point (AP). So forced deceleration of mass affects right-angles to that line. Resistance versus deceleration thus effects turning of rotor axis around system axis, same time turning supporting point around system axis. At this lever arm, all forces of deceleration like acceleration affect.
At this picture at B are drawn six rods (HA) with effective masses (M3 to M8) at hub-shaped rotor, each rod fix installed by two fixing points (BP). This arrangement no longer shows process in time-units, but same distances between masses (like real arrangment at rotor).
Mass M5 has turned some ahead in comparison with above position M2, its fixing points are within section of minimum speed in space. So mass already here is braked down to its minimum speed, afterwards is pulled inside at its most shortest radius. It´s clear, inertia of that mass thereby effects turning momentum onto rotor like onto system shaft (by lever arm described above).
Mass M6 is positioned in section of its most shortest radius, its fixing points however are already moving faster outside. So mass is accelerated from quite inside outwards (resp. is practically slinged outwards, e.g. like discus thrower achieve best effect).
Mass M7 shows inertia direction left side upwards (here, at this picture). Rotor has to accelerate mass there by pulling force. That force is directed tangential, so nearby in direction of rod. If both forces are drawn within power-diagramm, there is resulting force, longer than previous inertia and also longer than input pulling force. This will mean, there acceleration is done by minimum input of forces (like already at previous position M6 and also at following position).
Fixing point of mass M8 shows maximum speed, thus would have to accelerate mass at its most longest radius - if mass would be arranged radially. As mass here is installed at backward showing rod, mass here is not yet at its outmost point of track. So acceleration of mass here is done easy, cause mass still moves (falls) outwards.
Until position M3 this mass (M8) practically moves by constant speed. Its fixing points (BP) there already come to slowed down section of their track. So already here starts lever-arm-effect of mass (going on to move relatively fast) versus fixing points (all times moving relatively slower). This delay goes on via position M4 until position M5, like already discussed.
This sketch only shows turning movement of mass around rotor axis. As there is additional turning around system axis, masses move at spiral tracks. Rotor axis (RA) all times moves into direction marked by arrow (in relation to system axis). By this movement result demanded pulling forces at acceleration section. By thrust of inertia of masses at their deceleration section, rotor axis is pushed into that direction.
Acceleration and deceleration are without problems, pulling forces and thurst forces are equal by common understanding (not however by points of view concerning movements of ether, and not by these lever arm effects at backward showing rods). However, self-acceleration of these Firewheels is also to explain much easier.
Centrifugal Forces at Leverarm
Original power is inertia. Centrifugal forces only result of redirection of direction of inertia. At turning discs, centrifugal forces are compensated by tension within whole material. At turning wheels with spokes and rim, centrifugal forces are compensated partly by spokes, however also by tension within material of rim. Wheel here is build only by hub and spokes, so centrifugal forces of separated effective masses can affect only via lever arm described above.
Centrifugal forces of masses, which are steady redirected into circled track, are same amount into all directions and compensate to null. Here however, mass at its acceleration section is redirected less (mass moves from short radius to large radius), so centrifugal forces are less than at comparable circled track. Opposite, mass at its deceleration section is redirected essentially stronger than at comparable circled track, correspondingly essential stronger are centrifugal forces. So here exists all times surplus of centrifugal forces at inward moving phase (in drawing above all times masses are positioned downside).
Centrifugal forces all times affect radially to each turning point. Turning point of this spiral track walks between rotor axis and system axis to and fro. The very only point really stationary at this system is point of system axis. So difference of centrifugal forces mentioned above, all times will lastly affect by lever arm around system axis. This turning momentum, at the one hand results turning ahead of rotor axis around system axis, on the other hand via gear rim and gear wheel (supporting point above) onto system shaft.
Firewheeel-Motor
At EV DSM 08 now design of a Firewheel-Motor schematically is shown, upside by cross-sectional view, below by longitudinal cross-secitonal view through system axis.
Within housing (GE, German Gehäuse), rotor arm (RT, German Rotorträger) is beared, turnably around system axis (SA). Drive (AN, German Antrieb) resp. controlling of system is done by hollow shaft of rotor arm (RT).
Excentrically within rotor arm (RT), rotor (RO) is beared turnably, which practically is a large dimensioned hub. Outside at rotor are installed effective masses (WM, German Wirksame Masse), here e.g. in shape of six arms showing in backward direction.
As gear, rotor hub inside again is formed as gear rim (ZK, German Zahnkranz), system shaft correspondingly is formed as gear wheel (ZR, German Zahnrad). Here for example, diameters of gear rim and gear wheel are in relation of three to two.
When starting system, beside hollow shaft of rotor arm (RT), also system shaft is to turn up, so also rotor comes to additional turning around its rotor axis (RA). At running modus, at system shaft is to take surplus of turning momentum as output (AB, German Abtrieb) off system.
At longitudinal view as an example, only one modul is drawn. Within cylinder of rotor arm (RT) well could be arranged several rotors, naturally correspondingly shifted.
This picture marks most simple construction of this motor: housing (GE), rotor arm (RT), rotor as hub with its arms, system shaft - five constructional elements. Very important advantage versus earlier constructions is, effective masses are mounted fix within resp. on roto, so this motor demands less moved parts.
Round turning Unbalancy
This animation exists of 24 pictures. Rotor arm (grey) is turning each 15 degrees, within which, rotor (green) with its arms (blue) again turns by each 15 degrees. Its remarkable, by addition of these both absolutely ´round´ movements, this ´slamed´ process does result.
Indeed, this machine consciously is constructed with unbalancy. Mass of rotor as a whole, in relation to system axis is asymmetric, thus unbalanced (however easy to balance by counter-weights or several moduls). Mass of rotor is symmetrically arranged around rotor, but masses don´t show balanced turning momentums, based at difference of centrifugal forces discussed above.
This momentum here one can see well by looking at one arm (resp. its fixing point at hub): mass can fall outwards relatively free, at the following is slinged inwards around system axis. Whenever one mass is falling outwards, opposite mass is pulled inside.
Unbalancy at only one axis is un-productive all times, there are unbalanced pulling forces, but only into radial directions, thus compensating each other. Here however, unbalancy is walking around rotor axis and this again around system axis. By supporting point between gear rim and gear wheel, unbalanced forces is possible to affect at effective lever arm, thus producing turning momentum onto system.
So here, unbalancy not at all is result of static un-equality of weights, but unbalancy is based on difference of kinetic forces. Effective masses at outward phase are redirected less, thus resists less, i.e. relative small centrifugal forces are pulling rotor axis backwards. Opposite, masses at inward phase are redirected strongly onto shorter radius, mass resists stronger at its backward showning lever arm, pulling rotor axis and system ahead.
Boomerang
Shape of effective masses of this animation like upside example of design of Firewheel-Motor is simular to above five-arm crop circle picture with its relative thin arms. Effective mass however can be shaped differently, e.g. analog to other fotos above.
At EV DSM 09 as an example, an other most effective shape is shown, arms reach far back, practically shaped like boomerang.
Backward directed shape is essential, cause acceleration phase is shifted backward into that section of track, where mass is allowed to fall outside onto larger radius. Opposite at deceleration phase, outer mass moves relatively fast, thus resulting thrust by large lever arms onto fixing points much more inside and ahead.
When boomerang is thrown, it´s put into motion ahead and rotation same time. When boomerang hits onto ´barrier´, both kinds of movements are stopped. It not only looks like, given power thereby is transfered most effective into energy of movement, it´s approved.
Movement´s processes here are quite identical to throwing boomerangs and it´s important, all movement (and thus also movement of fixing points, analog to throwing hand) are done at spiral tracks. Acceleration of different masses is done time-shifted by backward showing arm (totally different to radially arranged masses and their acceleration at circled track). Just like boomerang hitting barrier, both movements (movement ahead, here around system axis, plus turning around rotor axis) are delayed (but here not stopped).
Like at free turning wheel or long stretched sickles above, also at boomerang-shaped mass it´s not allowed to assume all masses theoretically to be concentrated at one single point, but different parts of masses with their differing movements are to watch separately.
All mass points of this shape show inertia, but their directions radiate, i.e. also centrifugal forces of each different redirection (radial to each turning point). For example, centrifugal forces of mass point most outside-back isn´t supported radially at all, but will affect at a lever arm to next, further inside-ahead neighbouring mass point.
So within this boomerang shaped arm results tension within materia, e.g. alongside backward and frontside border of this constructional element. At backside, material is tensioned by pulling forces, adding until until fixing point at rotor hub. There these pulling forces affect radially, like normally every centrifugal force is compensated.
Material at frontside of this element however is tensioned by pressing forces, which walk ahead until frontside fixing of arm at rotor hub. There, this pressure affects (nearby) in tangential direction of hub, thus showing thrust onto rotor. Again it´s important, these pulling and pressing forces don´t affect onto stationary rotor axis (and there would be compensated), but onto each turning point, lastly related to only stationary point of system axis.
Variations of Construction
So indeed, it might make sense to fix this arm at two fixing points, one backside and one in front of hub. At its inner part, this arm mustn´t be solid (e.g. there could be a drilling), so pulling and pushing forces at hub are effecting at different points (and are not partly compensated by tension within material). Arm e.g. could be build only as contour (one backside and one frontside rod, joint at ends) within which effective mass (even by several parts) is places loose.
So effective mass is to build diverse kind. Also central gear can be dimensioned differently.
By relation of diameters of gear rim and gear wheel is determined, which part of power surplus serves for turning of rotor axis or for turning of supporting point around system axis. Normally, turning of rotor axis around system axis is done by input at hollow shaft of rotor arm (RT), at least while system is started. By previous leverarm effect resp. this spreading of surplus however is to achieve, at running modus no input is demanded at all (so system is only controlled by hollow shaft).
For experts it will be easy to design opimum machines by these principles. Depending on application, different variations are to realize.
Final
For some years, I made conciderations and workouts concerning rotor systems, with this chapter I finally will close that subject. I did put lots of claims into web, of which nearby null is approved at the very moment. Today I claim, there can´t be a motor with less than these three parts: rotor arm, rotor, system axis. And I claim, this will do.
I took clues from corp circle pictures and three motives did impress like occupy me especially: Halfmoons, Sunwheels, Firewheels. To all three pictures, I developed corresponding designs, latest ones are best by sure. So I feel no longer urged to search for further solutions (but surely there are much more possibilities for self-running systems).
It´s totally simple and logic: unbalancy produces enormous forces, absolutely destructive for any machine. Unbalancy at one axis is nothing else but unproductive. As soon however, one takes a second axis with round-turning unbalancy, given momentum is to guide within circled track, as productively usable turning momentum. That´s no violation of energy constance at all, but´s only senseful directing given forces (of centrifugal force, to produce by nearby null input, as we like it). There is not more or less energy within space or system, but centrifugal forces no longer are destroyed by tension within material, but are ´consumed´ sensefully.
Now I do hope, above arguments (and much more at earlier chapters) show ´hard´ enough for experts, to go into these problems for days and weeks. So within months it will be possible to build really running motors by these principles (and I would like to report about). I hope, scientists and technicans will do this job for Free-Energy-Motors faster than I can describe and argument my next, just incredible claims.
I claim, whole universe is build up by only one single stuff and whole universe gapless exist of only one single piece of that matter, of undividable ether. I claim, all occurances, whether looking like materia or forces or spirit, are ´just´ each special patterns of movements of ether within itself.
These statements will be documented in extended new version of my Ether-Continuum-Theory, where chapter by chapter I´ll give to discussion here at this website.
Reading this chapter, you probably feel turning within turnings within your mind. As I translated this chapter into English, turnings naturally didn´t stop within my mind. So once more, hope really last time, there was born following chapter of unbalancies circling around, named Ringwheel-Motor. If you like it, go on turning these ideas within your mind.
Evert / 10.10.2002
| Appendix Perpetuum Mobile | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |