This crop circle picture, called ´sunwheel´, was drawn near Barbury Castle, Wiltshire, in 1997. This motive was shown in several versions and all give impression of some movement. This system e.g. can be looked at to turn, but even more ´lively´ impression would be by assuming additional pulsating movement. Based on impression of this and similar crop circle pictures, corresponding movement´s processes are presented by this chapter.
At earlier concepts, for example at Impuls-Principle and Centripetalpowerspider, only unsteady turning of output shaft was achieved. By present concept of Sunwheel-Motor however, output driving shaft and input shaft will both turn steady, thus well usable turning movements are achieved.
Essential point of solution is, masses at spiral inward turning track does need more power for centripetal redirection than masses at spiral outward opening tracks. Correspondingly different are effective resp. necessary centrifugal resp. centripetal forces. If forces of outward movement and of inward movement of masses effect at same constructional element, difference of these forces is free for usage outside of system. This concept can be realized by excentric axis, for example by ´crank-shaft´.
Like Viktor Schauberger searched for, this motor is a pure mechanically working ´Implosion-Engine´, where usable energy is produced while masses moving inwards (like centripetal ´suction´), while masses moving outwards (by centrifugal pressure) by centrifugal forces automatically will reproduces starting situation of system.
Objectives of this chapter thus is presentation of a motor, working by these basic principles, above this however to workout clearly basic principles of this kind of Perpetuum Mobile.
Excentric axis
At first, this principle of movement is shown by picture EV CPS 71 rather schematically. A rotor arm (RT, German Rotorträger) turns around system axis (SA). At this rotor arm are installed rotor bearings (RL, German Rotorlager), within which rod-shaped rotors (RO) are mounted swivable. At each rotor is installed effective mass (MP).
At end of rotor-rod, an other joint (PL, German Pleuellager) is installed, whithin which a connecting rod (PS, German Pleuelstange) is mounted swivable. This connecting rod at the other end is mounted turnably around an excentric axis (EA), which is arranged excentrically to system axis.
At first, this excentric axis is assumed to stand still within space (while at really running system this excentric axis will turn around system axis, e.g. like a crank-shaft, as descirbed later). Rotor arm (RT) does turn around system axis (here all times assumed counter clock-wise).
While turning of system, distance between excentric axis and rotor bearing (RL) does vary all times. By rod-system of rotor (RO), joint (PL) and connecting rod (PS), effective masses (MP) will move at spiral tracks. At this picture, mass left side is at outward position, below mass is guided inside, right side mass is at inner position, upside mass can ´fall´ outwards again. Green dotted circles mark area between outmost in innermost position of effective masses.
It´s clear to see, mass form outside left until right side down is pulled strongly inwards by connecting rod (PS). Correspondingly strong pulling forces will effect at excentric axis, within this area practically showing right-angled to line between system axis and excentric axis. Opposite, within area upside of system axis and excentric axis, mass can fall outside rather fast resp. connecting rod (PS) will effect much less pulling forces versus effective mass.
Thus by this concept, excentric axis is weighted differently, at this example would be pulled downwards in total. If line between system axis and excentric axis is looked at to be a lever arm (like at a crank-shaft), most high difference of forces will effect right-angled to this arm, thus show rather good turning momentum.
Sickle shaped
Crop circle picture above does show ring-shaped and sickle-shaped elements, both ´seemingly´ turning. If this picture is transformed to principle above, instead of straight rotor rods resp. masses, here rotor and masses would be sickle shaped. There isn´t marked any excentric axis at this picture, however similar pictures does show many excentric elements.
At picture EV CPS 72 concept above is arranged analog to this crop circle picture. Sickle shaped elements are looked at to represent rotor (RO) resp. effective masses (MP). They are mounted within rotor arm (RT), however not by a rotor axis, but within a bearing (RL), also sickle-shaped.
Rotor arm (RT) is turning around system axis (SA), while connecting rod (PS) again is turnable around excentric axis (EA). At outer end of connecting rod again this joint (PL) is installed, where rotor (RO) is mounted swivable. This joint and connecting rod is drawn only left side at rotor A, naturally these elements are arranged at all other rotors analogly.
Left rotor A is positioned rather outside, rotor B is pulled inside within its bearing-shell, rotor C nearby is at its innermost position. By marks (green points and green dotted circle) one can see, center of masses will move rather concentric around system axis (but a little bit inside / outside and corresondingly ahead / back).
However, by these sickle-shaped elements, mass must not be looked at to be theoretically concentrated within one single point. As mentioned at earlier chapters, at these (pendulum) sickle-shaped elements one has to look at two different masses at least, cause moving in different directions by different speeds. Here for example, one can differ parts of mass within dotted circle (concentric to system axis) and parts of mass outside of this circle.
Left side (A) inner part is rather small, but after mass is pulled inside, inner part right side (D) is rather large. Opposite, parts of mass outside of dotted circle are rather backside (left side) resp. are accelerated ahead (right side), as one can see in comparison with each following rotor bearing.
Like at description of Impuls-Principle above, here also two mass parts are given, one part preferably moving in radial direction (inwards - outwards), the other part moving preferably concentric (ahead and back in turning sense). Sychrone movement of both masses that kind, at this chapter was described to be requisite for constant kinetic energy of system in total.
It´s generally known, kinetic energy of a rotor system is constant, even masses are moved inside and outside again. If rotor masses are guided inwards, mass must be allowed to move by higher angles speed - or turning momentum will be transfered from rotor to rotor arm. Opposite, if rotor masses are guided outwards, mass must be allowed to move at lower angles speed - or turning momentum must be transfered (back) from rotor arm to rotor.
Sickle-shape of effective mass of rotor and sickle-shaped bearings within rotor arm will easily make possible to keep turning momentum and turning speed of system constant in total. At the one hand, these sickle-shaped shells of bearings allow movements at reasonal tracks, at the other hand demanded transfere of turning momentums can be done within one mass by itself. So it is to notice, even by relative movements of rotor masses within rotor arm, turning speed of system is to keep up constant with rather low input of energy (only for losses of friction).
Turning within turning
Sickle-shape does show another positive effect, cause forces of redirection of parts of masses won´t effect only at one single rotor axis in total, but each part will have direct effect onto rotor arm, by given angles, based at its direct support at bearing surfaces.
Effective mass is not decelerated by connecting rod (PS). Rotor masses however will swing around joint (PL), ahead and inwards (even rotor is turning around its rotor axis, which however doesn´t exist as real constructional element). Connecting rod (PS) only effects redirection of movement of mass (while kinetic energy of masses at a whole won´t be affected).
That kind of bearing of effective masses does show another positive effect, cause masses are brought into turning movement, additional to their general turning around system axis. This additional turning is around center of circled shell of rotor bearing, sometimes same sense as system turning, sometimes counter system turning sense.
At inward-phase (above rotor positions from A to D), mass is turning same sense like system, thus turning inwards. This will mean, at the beginning of following outward-phase (from rotor position D back to A) less centrifugal forces will exist. Opposite, mass at this outward-phase does move counter turning sense of system. So at beginning of following inward-phase, much stronger forces are necessary for redirection of this relative turnings. Above was noticed, weights at excentric axis are unballanced. By this additional effect, one sided pressure at excentric axis (resp. crank-shaft) is even stronger.
At this small animation one can see, how sickle-shaped rotor masses swing inside - outside within their sickle-shaped bearings (left side up, mass is quite outside resp. back. Right side down, mass is quite inside resp. ahead). Distance between inner pics of rotor and excentric axis (marked by grey circle) is constant (like length of connecting rod PS), radius of all masses towards system axis however are variing all times.
While one turn around system axis, mass does one pulsating movement inwards and outwards back again. All masses thus move at inward bended spiral tracks, which afterwards does open towards outside. Absolute speed of all masses in total is constant, so also sum of kinetic energy of all masses is unchanged. For keeping up these movements, theoretically no energy input is necessary (besides for small losses by friction).
Turning momentum at crank-shaft
However, unbalancy of forces exists at excentric axis. Pulling-inward of mass is strong redirection of inertia (much stronger than by redirection into circled track). Opposite, at outward-phase inertia is much less redirected, thus there will exist much less centrifugal forces (much less than by redirection into circled track). Additional to these different centrifugal forces are existing inertial forces of relative turning same / counter system turning sense, as mentioned above.
All these forces are affecting onto excentic axis, which here would strongly be pressed downward. Difference of these effective forces is usable, if excentric axis is not standing still within space (as assumed up to now). For usage of these forces difference, thus excentic axis should be turnable around system axis (like at real running system and as is assumed at the following), for example in shape of a crank-shaft.
At picture EV CPS 74 schematically is shown one modul of this motor, upside by cross- sectional view, below by longitudinal sectional view. Rotor arm (RT) shows a concentric drilling for rotor bearing (RL), here e.g. three more rotor bearings are marked by dotted circled bows. Within this bearing, rotor (RO) is mounted with its sickle-shape in principle, inclusive effective mass (MP) fix connected with the rotor.
Ahead within the rotor, that joint (PL) is arranged, around which connecting rod (PS) is mounted swivable. Central end of connecting rod is guided by a crank-shaft, thus turnably mounted around excentric axis (EA), which is arranged excentrically to system axis (SA). Rotor arm (RT) is turning concentric around system axis.
Each connecting rod (PS) turns resp. swivels unsteady, so each rotor demands a separated connecting rod resp. each conneting rod is to install at different level of system axis. However, many of such moduls can be installed, one besides the other, e.g. analog to construction of crank-shaft of combustion engines (with 2 to 16 ´cylinders´).
This drawing does show schematically only one possible solution for this movement´s processes. This principle can technically be realized diverse kind. For example, for each rotor one separated crank-shaft could be installed at rotor arm, by a central gear wheel connected to a common output shaft. Then, also several rotors are to install at one axial level. If for example each three rotors would work shifted, three rotors could be at inward-phase and three rotors could be at outward-phase, thus showing situation like marked at Sunwheel crop circle.
One more time is to point out, crank-shaft inclusive connecting rod is simple to construct at only one axial level. Here for example, only that joint (PL) should be dimensioned thus large to include excentric axis. Also rotor could be dimensioned like a complete ring (with excentric drilling) around whole connecting rod. In principle, shapes will result like discussed intensively in concern with crop circle picture ´Threefold Halfmoon´. Diverse moduls thus can be arranged at central crank-shaft rather compact.
Depending on objectives of engine, this principle of movements is to realize by diverse technics. Following description of operating mode however is based on version described above, thus with only one normal crank-shaft.
Operating mode
Pulsating movements were also achieved with some earlier concepts, also by pure mechanical elements. However, output shaft there did mostly turn unsteady, thus no continuous turning momentum was available. Here however by this concept, only connecting rod (PS) does move unsteady, while crank-shaft and rotor arm are turning by steady speeds. If several moduls are used, at crank-shaft resp. output thus constant turning momentum is available.
Animation above does show movement´s process by excentric axis standing still within space. At running system however, excentric axis resp. crank-shaft will also turn around system axis. Thus all relative movements shown by animation above, in reality will occure while whole system is turning.
Starting this system, at first rotor arm (RT) must be accelerated to normal turning speed, e.g. by an electric motor. Within this starting phase (like eventually within later acceleration phases), output shaft should be allowed to turn free. Within this starting phase (or accelerating phase), effective masses must come up to certain absolute speed, thus inertia of motion exists, thus redirection of inertia into circled resp. spiral tracks will result corresponding centrifugal forces.
Situation at the beginning corresponds with animation above. By differences of effecting forces will result unbalanced pressure onto excentric axis. That crank-shaft would be to hold fix, if excentric axis should stand still. If however crank-shaft is free to turn, it will come up to turn same sense like systems turning, lastly up to speed of system as a whole (thus no longer relative movements of effective masses within rotor arm will exist).
As soon however as energy is demanded at output, crank-shaft will turn slower than rotor arm, so rotors will be forced to pulsating movements. If for example, crank-shaft will turn half speed of system, effective masses are pulled inside while one turning of rotor arm, will fall back outside within following full turn of rotor arm.
The slower the output shaft turns in relation to system´s turning, the faster rotors will pulsate, thus the stronger turning momentum at output will be available. However, there must be time enough for masses moving outside based only at centrifugal forces. On the other hand, as soon as no (longer) energy is demanded at output, crank-shaft automatically will acclerated up to speed of system.
Amount of ´working strokes´ each time unit, naturally depends also of absolute turning speed of system. Analog to starting phase, also within running mode this turning speed could be accelerated by energy input (e.g. by electric motor mentioned above). So this system can produce different amount of energy output, controllable by system turning speed (resp. input shaft) and relative speed of crank-shaft (resp. output shaft).
Ideal motor
So this motor works similar to any combustion motor, however Sunwheel-Motor is to construct much more compact and is to drive by much higher speed. As centrifugal force increases with speed by square, effective masses must not be very heavy. So this motor not only will work for stationary energy supply, but e.g. also for drive of vehicles with differing demand of energy.
Within this motor, already function of automatic gear is integrated (the slower output shaft turns in relation to system´s turning, the stronger turning momentum is available). Only when accelerating system turning speed it will make sense to take some ´turbo-gap´ (for some short time switch off resp. uncouple output demands). On the other hand, as centrifugal forces are very strong, gravity forces are without importance. So this motor can work with vertical or horicontal axis resp. system axis may show into any direction even at running mode.
Important difference of this motor versus any kind of other motors or generators however is, within Sunwheel-Motor won´t explode anything (like by terrible technics of burning and exploding, as Victor Schauberger already told). Opposite, Sunwheel-Motor produces usable energy by ´implosion´ of masses. Workload is done by stroke of pulling-inwards of masses. This act of pulling masses inwards is done by deceleration of crank-shaft resp. keeping down its relative slow turning speed (which without output-demands will automatically accelerate up to system turning speed).
Crank-shaft is hold back, e.g. by driving an electric generator. So rotor masses are pulled inwards indirectly by magnet, as magnet forces electric flux within coil. This motor e.g. directly could drive a water pump. So weight or inertia of water will indirectly do workload of pulling inward rotor masses. This motor e.g. could directly drive wheels of vehicles. So resistance of air or any friction losses, indirectly pulls inward rotor mass within Sunwheel-Motor.
So once more, at first this system must be turned up and is to keep up turning speed with small demands of energy input. By turning system, inertia forces are to produce and to keep existing very cheap. Phasewise, direction of inertia is redirected, which act normally will demand energy input. Here however, it´s only necessary to decelerate turning of crank-shaft (in relation to system turning speed) resp. to hinder steadily acceleration of crank-shaft´s turning (which otherwise automatically will occure).
Resitance versus resistance
Power of deceleration is done by act, e.g. to force electric flux within any electric circuit or to press upwards water versus gravity or to push aside air (within electric genertor, by waterpump or vehicle-drive above). So demanded centripetal power for redirection of a first materia (effective rotor mass) indirectly is done by resitance against change of status within a second materia (so for example above masses of electrons, water or air).
If now, forced change of status of second materia is wanted effect (by procuding electric flux, moving fluids or vehicles), then usable energy is earned that kind, normally demanded energy-input is saved. So at this ´Perpetuum Mobile´ nothing will move without cause, only one shape of energy is transfered into an other shape, like at any energetic processes.
Changing direction of inertia within first materia (of rotor masses) is forced by mechanics of crank-shaft (by its relative slow turning and resulting of this, by pulsation of rotor masses). Power demanded for pulling inward masses is taken into system of Sunwheel-Motor by gear (of crank-sahft resp. connected shafts to ´output-unit´).
So it´s necessary to change idea of energy flow in comparison with common units of generator and consumer of energy. Here, demand of consumer-unit is input for Sunwheel-Motor, power for pulsation of rotor masses practically backwards is brought into driving-unit. Resistance (of any kind) within consumer-unit is transfered backwards (by mechanical elements) as resistance versus centrifugal forces of rotor masses.
Theoretically, consumer-resistance must be same amount like inertia-resistance of rotor masses. Naturally, some energy is to take off for starting system (resp. occational acceleration to faster turning speed) and for friction losses. Analog to combustion engines, an autonomous system is to construct by service units like electric generator / motor and accumulator.
Decisively higher part of energy however, this system ´imports´ of resistance within consumer-units. Only by logical reverse-conclusion, this system (with its first materia) produces sensefull workload (at second materia) of consumer-unit.
Perpetuum Mobile
There is something special within Sunwheel-motor: this system is not ´damaged´ by redirection of inertia forces within ´work-phase´, as same inertia forces will guide masses back outside within ´recovery-phase´, so starting situation is reproduced automatically. By this meaning, this system is ´continuously turning´ Perpetuum Mobile, making usable ´Free Energy´.
Strangly however, this ´motor´ won´t drive consumer-unit, but consumer drives work-stroke of pulling inward rotor masses. Only cause this is done by relative delay within turning movements in general, also within consumer-unit exists turning movement versus consumer resistance - and that´s energetic effect within this assembly of Sunwheel-Motor and connected consumer-units.
I can´t describe better this ´clever organisation of movement´s processes´. But lastly now it would be fine, experts would tell me errors within statements and conclusions above - or honestly would try to realize these ideas for solutions. Crop circle picture of sunwheel would be fine as logo for this new technology of clean energy supply.
Evert / 27.06.2002
---
It´s not quite correct: one night later I was able to describe very concentrated Perpetuum-Mobile of Third Kind, principles of energy earning in general meaning.
| Appendix Perpetuum Mobile | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |