At chapter Bessler-Problem solved was stated discontinuous turning of Bessler-Wheel and this version of using gravity is presented there. At previous chapter Impulse-Principle and Centripetalpowerspider, general importance of this principle of movements were discussed and transfered to universal force of invertia. Prerequisites of energy-earning were named and application explained by example of concept of this engine named Centripetalpowerspider.
Here now at this chapter, some hints are offered for constructional possibilities using these effects. Previous engine can be build much more compact - where this concept since years was drawn into crop fields. Impulsive drive of rotor-systems is also to achieve by permanent-magnets. Lastly is water predestined for movement of this kind, so an engine named ´Im-pulsine´, analog to Schauberger´s ´Re-pulsine´, is discussed here.
Swing-Ring-Motor
At previous chapter, at last picture (EV CPS 30) was shown principle arangement of lever-arms of Centripetalpowerspiders. There, all parts and movement´s processes and effects of forces are decribed in details. A part of this drawing, now here at picture EV CPS 41 left side (B and C) is shown once more.
Essential is, this square of rods is stretched, while turning process into two directions: at B masse point (MP) is far away from system axis (SA) and at rod-bearing (HL, German Hebellager) acute angles are between both rods. At C, mass and rotor are rather next to system axis, so at rotor-bearing (RL, German Rotorlager) acute angles are between rods there.
Effective masses are to concentrate nearby area of rod-bearing (HL) resp. next to rotor-bearing (RL). It doesn´t matter, whether mass is fixed at drive-rod (AH) or at rotor (RO) resp. at rotor (RO) or at rotor-arm (RT). Mass at rotor-bearing (RL) turns around system axis by constant radius, so theoretically this mass could also be installed at opposite side of rotor-arm. By simulation programs is to caculate, which relations for which application will show best results.
Depending on relation of lengths of rods and dimension of swivel-area, sqares will show different shape. At this picture right side, lenghts of rods e.g. are 5, 6, 7 and 8 units long, swivel-area is still some 45 degrees (only for demonstration thus large, in reality much smaller swivel-areas will fit, only minimum swivel-areas are neccessary at high turning speeds). Resulting of these lengths of rods are also a rather ´flat´ square (D) resp. an ´acute´ sqare (E).
Lastly at chapter Crop-Circle-Motor was detailed, a ´link-chain´ like this can be arranged within rather narrow space. It´s only neccessary to dimension a bearing thus large, each previous bearing is included. Instead of confusing arrangement of rods, rather compact constructional elements will result.
At picture EV CPS 42, previous squares are drawn once more, however by smaller scale. Drive-bearing e.g. is drawn thus large to include system axis. Distance between both centers is length of drive-arm (AT). Analogly all other rods were drawn in shape of circled elements, so drive-rod (AH), rotor (RO) and rotorarm (RT), which concentric to system axis includes whole system.
Constellation at D does represent flat square, while acute square is represented by constellation at E. Even bearings are ´oversized´, naturally forces effects exist quite analog to rod-arrangement above. If masses are concentrated at these elements corresponding to rules mentioned above, this design will work completely analog to Centripetalpowerspider.
Actually, I wanted just to check, which kind of sqares will result by lengths, chosen purely by chance. Afterwards, I looked at Fotos of Crop-Circle-Pictures and had to turn upside drawing D only by some 180 degrees to get this correspondence.
 |
 |
This still won´t tell anything to many people, other men with knowledges about CAD should start to find out optimum constellations and to construct this ´Swing-Ring-Motor´. Only one more hint: rods at ´Threefold-Halfmoon´ are 1-2-2-2 units long, sickles there mark concentration of effective masses. Rest is engineering work as usual.
However, still essential hint of Georg Künstler is valid: these systems are not able to produce energy continuously but only by phases. For example, a generator at system shaft must take power off, only once or twice or probably four times (at high revolutions and minimum swivel-area) each turning of system. Opposite, just impuls-like feeding of direct-current into accumulator seems advantageous. Demanded technics for this process are well known.
Swing-Disk-Motor resp.
Permanent-Magnet-Motor
This concept may not be mixed up with ´swing-disks´ commonly know at technics. Term of ´Swing-Disk-Motor´ however describes well essentials of this engine, so this term is good for differing this design from others. Also permanent magnets could be used as impuls-tricker, so ´Permanentmagnetmotor´ would also be appropriate terminus.
Above was mentioned, both effective masses should be concentrated at both bearings (HL and RL), no matter fixed at which constructional element. If for example, masses are installed at drive-rod and at rotor-arm, rotor will function only to keep distance between both bearings. Opposite now it´s aim, masses to arrange that kind, most few parts are demanded. Same time, continuous turning drive at output should be available.
At picture EV CPS 51 these elements are shown schematically. Again, there is a rotor-arm (RT), e.g. in shape of (two parallel) disks, which are fix installed at central shaft, turning around system axis (SA). At rotor-arm are installed rotor-bearings (RL), around which rotor (RO) can swivel, concentric to its rotor axis (RA). At the rotor are installed two effective masses, one mass outside-backside (MA, German Masse-außen, green point, in turning sense backward to rotor axis) and one inner mass (MI, grey point). Rotor and masses swivel within a certain area (marked by dotted lines), relativ to rotor-arm (RT). Angles of this movement´s area can be fixed by any know technics (here not drawn).
At rotor left side (A), outer mass (MA) is at its outmost track-position, downside (B) this mass is most inside, left side (C) again outside, upside (D) once more pressed towards inside, left side (A) again back at its starting position. Comparing with green dotted circled bow (from C to A) one can see, this mass moves at track with varying radius around system axis, by nearby constant angles-speed.
By this swivel movements of rotor, same time inner mass (MI) is accelerated and decelerated in turning sense (so turns with differing angles-speeds). Inner mass moves at rather steady radius, to recognize by comparison with grey dotted circle bow (from C to A).
So, masses and movements meet prerequisites mentioned above. In principle, there are two mechanical circuits, their mutual building-up was descibed at chapter Pendulum-Wheel. There, both swinging movements were done at tracks of varying radius. Here now, pendulum movements are done two different ways: at the one hand inwards/outwards, at the other hand ahead/backwards. Above this, movements are easier to coordinate based on steady radial working centrifugal forces.
So, constructing unsufficient model of Pendulum-wheels wasn´t in vain, but good training and mental preparation for me. Like there, also here the rotor mustn´t be disk-shaped, but could simply be build like two-arm pendulum (like marked at rotor (D) upside). At a third arm could be installed a permanent magnet.
This magnet of rotor (RM) is also drawn at rotor (C) right side. Opposite to these magnets, an other magnet is fix installed at the housing (GM, German Gehäuse-Magnet). Likely poles of magnets show towards each other. Naturally rotor-magnets are to install at all rotors same kind, analogly here at the housing should be installed second magnet mirrored to system axis.
While rotor-arm (RT) is turning, rotor-magnet will move alongside housing-magnet. At first meeting of likely poles, naturally will come up resistance, however at end of meeting corresponding pushing forces will exist. So in sum, this meeting of magnets is neutral.
However, wanted effect at beginning of meeting is, rotor is decelerated in turning around system axis, so inwards-swivel movement of outer mass (MA) is started. Following, pushing forces between likely poles should keep up this inward-movement (so housing magnet (GM) shouldn´t be concentric shaped but bended some inwards). By these magnets, thus rotor´s turning relative to rotor-arm (RT) is started impuls-like. So, also by this concept some ´brakeing´ exists, however no energy is drawn off system by this act (while at previous designs by this act essential part of energy is earned).
Here however aim is to achieve continuous turning momentum at central shaft (at least when diverse rotors are installed, phase-shifted at diverse axial levels, i.e. some rotors between each two rotor-arms).
Decisive however also by this concept is coordination of masses, which should show likely behavior concerning inertia. For example, inner mass (MI) must be much heavier than outer mass (MA). Essential criteria also are angles between both masses, which must be smaller than right-angles drawn here. For example, swivel-area of inner mass (MI) must end at radial direction to system axis (thus opposite to drawing here). Above this, swivel-area probably should be much smaller than marked here for demonstration.
Power-effects of this system are as follows: deceleration at outer border of rotor won´t hinder further turnings of masses, cause masses can go on falling ahead between rotor-magnet and system axis. Outer mass (MA) is pressed onto track of shorter radius, so turning momentum becomes free. Like at designs above, this will result acceleration of inner mass (MI), via disk resp. rods of rotor.
If now however, inner mass (MI) is dimensioned thus heavy, free turning momentum of outer mass (MA) can´t be transfered into acceleration of inner mass (MI) completely, then decelerated outer mass (MA) same time will push ahead rotor-arm (RT) via rotor-bearing (RL). So turning momentum becoming free is devided into demanded acceleration of inner mass (MI), remaining part however will effect directly turning momentum at central shaft.
By this process however, outer mass (MA) is decelerated to speed corresponding to most inner track point, thus outer mass (MA) must be re-accelerated onto its original angles-speed at its outmost track point. This process won´t reduce angles-speed of rotor-axis (RA) nore rotor-arm (RT). Centrifugal forces will effect stretching of distance between system-axis and outer mass (MA) with positive turning momentum (compare descriptions at previous chapters).
´Resting Pole´ within space hereby is (heavy) inner mass (MI), around which outer mass (by its centrifugal forces) and outer parts of rotor are slinged ahead in turning sense. Inner mass (MI) thereby is decelerated, back to its original angles-speed, thus giving back meanwhile stored turning momentum to outer mass (MA) resp. outer parts of rotor.
This simple animation does show movement´s processes described above. However, relative movements of both masses are but hard to recognize resp. are only to detecte by concentrated observing one rotor. In reality, swivel-areas are much smaller, i.e. towards outside this system will look like steady turning.
So by this concept, energy is not drawn off system by deceleration directely, but only that part of energy-surplus, resulting of sling-effect. An advantage of this system is its constantly usable energy, which is available as purely mechanical turning movement by steady speed. Based at most simple design (there are only houseing, shaft and rotor-arms, rotors and some magnets), even high turning speeds are possible. So this motor is not only to use for driving an electric generator, but is to use for many applications. By sensefull controlling (e.g. variable magnetic flux) also varying speeds are to drive or different workloads are to achieve.
Many explorers and handcrafts are engaged with permanentmagnets, so soon will construct models corresponding to this Swing-Disk-Motor - which probably won´t work automatically. Only by exacte optimazing of system like mentioned above, this engine will work - finally running in many variations and used for applications of diverse kind, by guarantee.
Swing-Disk-Generator
An interesting variation of previous machine can demonstate principle of movements once more rather clear. This engine is called generator cause directe at rotor, electric flux is produced. Analog to previous picture, schematically is shown basic design and process by picture EV CPS 53.
Around system axis (SA), again rotor-arm (RT) turns, inclusive its rotor bearings (RL). At each bearing, rotor (RO) is mounted, swivable around rotor axis (RA). At this rotor, again an outer mass (MA) and an inner mass (MI) are installed. Rotor mustn´t be circle-shaped (so circle here is marked dotted), sufficient would be rods between masses and rotor axis.
Masses here show acute angles between. Outer mass shows maximum right-angled to rotor-axis, inner mass shows maximum radial to system axis. Dotted lines mark wanted swivel-area.
At outmost position of masses (at A) centrifugal forces work at lever arms, so want to turn masses outside. Rotor is to keep at this position, only when this turning is blocked. For this reason, e.g. at rotor is drawn an other rod showing outside, which is supported at a block (RB) of rotor-arm (RT).
This blockade-function, phasewise could also be done by a block (GB), where this ´hurdle´ is mounted fix at housing, like shown downside at B. When outer rod of rotor crashes onto this block, relative turning of rotor does result.
Inner mass is accelerated resp. will resist (thus wants to keep back rotor-bearing (RL)). By this, outer mass would be decelerated (and will also resist resp. wants to press ahead rotor-bearing (RL)). If masses and lengths of rods are coordinated, effects of crash are neutral.
As consequence of this crash however, outer mass is pressed inwards (onto rotor bearing (RL) will effect corresponding counter-pressure, however into radial direction, thus neutral). Like at previous systems, turning momentum will come free and is transfered into acceleration of inner mass.
As soon as outer rod of rotor is no longer hold back by block of housing (GB), rotor will swing back to its original position (like shown at C). As discussed above, only exchange of kinetic energies between masses will occure, so turning of rotor-arm (RT) is not affected (if masses, lengths and angles are coordinated).
This construction in principle fits to ´Double-Sling-Effect´ discussed at this website multiply. Radius of turning mass is reduced, there by barrier between system axis and mass, here by barrier outside of mass. At both cased however, balance of turning-momentums isn´t correct - if workload done by barrier isn´t included in calculations. Work done by barrier is transfered into kinetic energy of mass - or can be draw off system.
By abrupted impact, all times energy got lost. So this hard mechanics should be replaced by brakeing more ´soft´. For this purpose, at outer rod of rotor again a magnet (RM) could be installed, which phasenwise (like upside at D) will move alongside or within a coil (GS, German Gehäuse-Spule), fix mounted at housing (thereby producing electric flux).
This picture shows only schematic design, real engines naturally are to construct much more compact. There could be used many rotors and seversal coils. If pairs of rotors work phase-shifted, forces at rotor-arm (RT) are compensated, so system will run soft - and produce electric flux practically steady.
Energy-surplus is produced at ´power stroke´ by pushing-back masses versus centrifugal forces, while at ´recovery stroke´ centrifugal forces will reproduce starting situation. By this basic principle, lots of energy-generators by numberless variations are to build.
Impulsine
At section ´Real Machines´, at first was discussed Don Martin Generator and there was worked out importance and effects of phase-wise redirection of masses. In concepts above, this impuls was used in combination with ´brakeing-out´ energy at disadvantageous angles, by pulling inwards of masses. By previous magnets, again that pushing-inwards of masses is used in combination with sling-effect of outward-falling masses. Suitable for all these processes, water as effective masses should be.
Like above, insights of analyses of Don-Martin-Generator were applied to Edge-Ring-Turbines, so here these additional points of view could be applied to an ´Impulsine´, analog to Schauberger´s visions.
At picture EV CPS 61 schematically is shown cross-sectional view of that engine. A round cylinder is turning around system axis (SA). Side-walls of cylinder are shaped that kind, heart-shaped chambers (HK) exist, more exactely: like half of heart-shape (as most simple structure, wall could have only some waved surface, see Edge-Ring-Turbine above).
Some distance inside of wall, elements are installed with profiles like wings. This rotor (RO) could also be shaped like sails or simply like circled bows. An any case, this element must be swivable some inwards and outwards. Axis of rotor is mounted at bearings of cylinder.
Here is drawn one rotor at diverse positions, which this one rotor will take while turning once around system axis. If several rotors are installed within this cylinder, all rotors will have to move sychronously, so will show analog positions all time.
Cylinder partly is filled up with water. As system is started, wall and rotors will pull water with its turning movement. After some time, whole system inclusive water will turn same speed. Now, turning speed of cylinder should be reduced a little bit, so water within cylinder will run ahead. At least now, rotors should start to swing some inwards and outwards (controlled by any mechanics, here not drawn). Input of driving energy is no longer demanded resp. now energy-output is available at system shaft, cause self-accelerating effects come up.
Rotor left side at A is drawn by its normal position (showing into direction of dotted concentric circle). If rotor is swiveled some inside (B), water flux (as water moves faster than wall and rotor) will effect pressure at inner wall of this ´wing´, so thrust will exist onto rotor (via bearings also onto cylinder, accelerating whole system). Water however won´t be decelerated correspondingly, but water-vortex at center of cylinder is accelerated.
In addition, by larger angles versus flux, lift will exist at this wing (with partly component again in turning sense). Alongside rotor outer surface an area of suction will come up, into which water will fall with accelerated speed (cause molecular movements are directed by suction, see Fluid-Technology here). Within this area, thus centrifugal forces are compensated partly, water of neighbouring heart chambers will drop down resp. will flow ahead with accelerated speed (cause suction at upper surface of wing has effect far ahead, so here versus turning sense backwards into following heart chambers).
If at the following, rotor will swivel back to normal position (C), central vortex will turn some slower, water at a whole will move outwards and outside-upwards. By this process however, previous acceleration won´t be reduced, water´s speed outside will only go back to corresponding angles-speed.
Rotor even can go on swinging outwards (D), so will come close to sidewall. Between rotor outer surface and cylinder´s wall, thus a jet will be build, within which water is acceleratd additionally (as well know by fluid technology).
These heart chambers are ideal shape, within which side-fluxes can exist with different speeds. If alongside chamber flux of higher speed exists, within chamber will come up suction (analog to well known water-jet-pump), thus at cylinder wall will exist thrust ahead. On the other hand, by side-flux within chamber, main-flux is protected versus friction at wall, thus can flow with steady speed. Opposite, slowed down main-flux will be re-accelerated by still faster turning side-fluxes in these chambers.
Effects of this heart-shaped wall are described e.g. at Edge-Ring-Turbine above. More detailed informations about flux are contents of Fluid-Technology at this website. In total, water flows ahead within this cylinder and will at least keep this relative speed constant. Energy of brakeing-inwards water by rotors swivel is free available - analog to previous systems.
In principle, this Impulsine could also work with fins, fix mounted within housing. Instead of wings above, e.g. eight fins could be installed, each four in positions marked upside. Movements process discussed above while one turning of system, now would occure same time at different sides. For example, at two opposite sides, water outside would be high and low between.
Ether-Vortices
This Impulsine technically won´t be usable at many applications, like previous designs are. Opposite to mechanical masses at lever arms above, watermasses however flow within continuous movements processes. This leads to next conciderations, lastly all movements are based at movements of that matter, of which all materia exists: ether.
Mechanincal rotor-systems or units with rotating water, thus are only forerunners of systems, within which ether-movements by itself will be used for energy-earning. As mentioned above, this double kind of acceleration, inwards/outwards and forewards/backwards, are characteristics of movements within atoms like free ether by itself.
By these workouts, my investigations about mechanical rotor systems are completed. Now technicans and engineers will have to make concrete products of these theoretic ideas about possible solutions for free energy. I am looking forward to concentrate at subject of ether and I will try to contribute to better understanding of this outstanding matter. At following chapter, I will talk about some Consequences in brief, as now pure mechanical Perpetuum Mobile will become reality.
Evert / 02.05.2002
| Consequences - Real Machines | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |