With many of my analyses concerning Bessler-Wheel I pointed out possibility, a real mechanical Perpetuum Mobile did already exist in history. Obvisiously (e.g. measured by numberless emails) I was successful to focus interest of many colleagues to this subject (at least at German part of web). Based on my conciderations to characteristics of ether (and confirmed e.g. by experiences of remote-viewing) it´s important, many people put ideas into ´morphic field´ to activate special subjects. So it was only the question how long it will take, until an ´artist´ could read-out right answers of that huge storage of condensed informations.
At my conciderations, especially I pointed out function of pendulum mechanism outside of Bessler-Wheel. I did know, essential function for controlling that system were done by pendulums or pendulum swinging. I did design diverse concepts for this purpose, some of might probably work. Even it sounds strange: I am convinced, there are lots of solutions for self-accelerating wheels. Above this I do claim: within one year there will exist lots of Perpetuum Mobile.
This confidence is based at fact, a colleague inventor succeeded in demonstrating an absolutly convincing variation of solution. He found that solution by own experiments, at my website he only found diverse assertions for his ´unbelievable´ results. His tremendous achievement was to realize, there are not any parts within Bessler-Wheel swinging, but Bessler-Wheel itself is swinging while turning.
After he presented his concept and patent now at internet and as he will focus at practical realisation of his machine, I am allowed to describe theoretical conciderations about causes of selfacceleration of this concept. Additional workouts to general theory, solutions in general and some applications are descirbed at following chapters.
Basic concept
Picture EV BKS 01 schematically shows basic design. A shaft turns around system axis (SA) and (fixe attachted with) also the large wheel. This wheel inside is build as gear-rim (ZK, German Innen-Zahnkranz). Within this gear-rim a rotor (RO) is rolling alongside, so this rotor is build as gear-wheel. A rotor arm (RT, German Rotorträger) is free turnable around system axis (i.e. around central shaft). At the rotor arm is installed a bearing, at which the rotor is mounted, turnable around its central axis (RA).
Effective mass (MP) is installed exzentrically at the rotor. The rotor has a smaller diameter than the large wheel, here e.g. diameter of gear-wheel is one third of diameter of gear-rim. At this picture, starting position is shown at A, where rotor is positioned quite downside and its mass also does show downwards.
At this picture at B, now the large wheel is turned counter clock-wise by 120 degrees. As teeth of gear-wheel are in connection with gear-rim, also rotor did turn correspondingly around system axis. At that position, mass of rotor would show right side up.
As now however, rotor is turnable around its axis and rotor arm can free turn around system axis, rotor can turn that kind, its mass showing downwards all times (here e.g. rotor could turn clock-wise by 120 degrees). Based on this turning however, rotor arm will run ahead by 40 degrees within gear-rim. This movement is shown at this picture at C. Both movements here are separated fictivly, naturally both movements of B and C in reality will occure same time.
At D, large wheel did turn further 120 degrees (marked by black line of radius). As effective mass still wants to show downwards, rotor again will run ahead one third.
At this picture at E, large wheel now made one full turn around system axis, so rotor now will be positioned right side up. While large wheel did one turn, rotor additionally did turn once around its own axis. According to relation of diameters, the rotor arm will run ahead and thus will do more than one turning, here e.g. did turn 480 degrees.
At this picture at F are shown diverse positions of one rotor and its effective mass does show downwards at any position, based on gravity. This picture same time could show six different rotors (RO), arranged at concentric rotor arm (RT, dotted blue circle), all rotors moving sychronously, based at connection between gear-wheels and gear-rim (ZK) of large wheel. Dotted arrows do mark relation of turning of gear-rim and rotor arm, here relation of 90 and 120 degrees.
Unsteady turning of wheel
At picture EV BKS 02 at A schematically is shown process of movements, resulting of unsteady turning of gear-rim (ZK), opposite to steady turning by 120 degrees each time-unit at picture above. Starting position is assumed upside part marked (D) of large wheel, same time rotor (RO) there is at its upmost position (D).
If gear-rim is turned by 90 degrees, his part previously at upmost position (D) now is showing to left side (black E). Same time, rotor axis (resp. rotor arm, RT) will have turned by 120 degrees to position downside left (red E). Exzentric mass of rotor still shows downwards. Corresponding to these movements, rotor inclusive its mass and rotor arm as well did build up inertia.
If now within next time unit, gear-rim is decelerated, e.g. part marked would turn only 60 degrees, this part of large wheel would come to position downside left (black F). Rotor and rotor arm can turn free around rotor axis resp. system axis. Based on inertia above, these units want to keep on movements steady. So rotor resp. rotor arm will come to position downside right (red F).
Rotor thereby is rolling alongside gear-rim, thus on a track becoming slower (please compare e.g. conciderations at chapter Wheels at tracks moved), i.e. its mass now will show to left side. Deceleration of gear-rim so did result some raising-up of effective mass.
If at following time-unit (after black F), gear-rim is free to move, part marked will turn further 60 degrees by its own inertia. As inertia of rotor arm practically is not reduced, rotor arm within this time-unit will turn its steady 120 degrees around system axis. So rotor arm did come back to its starting position upside (red G). This turning of rotor arm, based on connecting gear-teeths, will result turning of gear-rim by 90 degress (its original speed). So within this time-unit, rotor arm did pull gear-rim ahead.
Above this however, effective mass of rotor would like to show downwards all time, i.e. gear-rim is turned ahead by further 30 degrees. So since beeing free (black F), gear-rim does turn by 120 degrees in total, coming to position right side (black G). Delay of second time-unit thus is equalized within third time-unit. While gear-rim did these turnings of 270 degrees in total, rotor arm did turn four-third of, so one full turning around system axis.
At picture above at A, starting position of rotor is only representativ for any position. Also rate of deceleration of gear-rim is only an example. At this picture at B, as an example, are shown six rotors, all moving sychronously. At this picture at C, an example of much less sideward swinging of masses is shown, i.e. based on less intermediate delay of gear-rim.
Generally, any number of rotors resp. relative diameter of rotors can be defined, even one rotor with relative large diameter is possible. Also relative deceleration of gear-rim is variable, even depending on workload of system.
By this little animation, for example three rotors are shown. Each mass (green line) swings sidewards by 45 degrees, three times while one full turn around system axist. This is done, cause large wheel (resp. gear-rim) each 90 degrees is decelerated and accelerated again (please look at black marks. Obvisiously it´s hard to recognize these differing speeds of turning wheels by naked eyes).
Mass and constance of energy
If these processes of movements shall come true, relation of masses moved naturally is of decisive relevance. Re-acceleration of gear-rim e.g. is only possible, if that large wheel is constructed rather light. Opposite, mass of rotor arm should be rather heavy, so its inertia will guarantee steady turning speed, so can pull back light gear-rim to its original turning speed. Also mass point of rotors should be rather excentric and must show sufficient weight, cause only these masses are effective for this system.
By deceleration of gear-rim, no kinetic energy gets lost for system in total. Level of energies in sum is constant (naturally besides losses of friction). Besides this however, workload for deceleration can be used outside of system, as free surplus of energy. This sounds crazy, nevertheless it´s fact. Exacte explanation of this problem is desribed in details at next chapter.
Allready here however can be stated: constant turning of system (like at picture EV BKS 02 at B) is neutral concerning forces (naturally besides friction-losses). When masses swing out (at C), masses right side (upwards moving) are pushed onto a track more inside and shorter, so masses are decelerated. Opposite, masses left side (moving downwards) are guided onto a track more outside and longer, masses are accelerated. Both processes in total are neutral concerning forces. However, all masses are lifted to higher lever, so potential energy of higher level is build up. When all masses swing back downwards after gear-rim got free to move, all these processes are done quite analogly, but reverse. So after one cycle, original status of energies is present and unchanged.
Relative delay of gear-rim however is an act of deceleration, for which power must be invested - or this system intermediately is loaded with work, e.g. gear-rim outside of system has to do a short-time job.
Swinging while turning
It´s brilliant merit of Georg Künstler - that´s name of ´artist´ above (German ´Künstler´ means artist) - to recognize, Bessler-Wheel by itself didn´t turn steady, but while turning was moving ahead and back, thus running faster and slower. It´s astonishing, contemporary observers of historic Bessler-Wheel didn´t registrate this kind of movements. However, as animation above shows, by naked eyes it´s hard to see differences of speed at turning wheel.
It was clear for me (e.g. at chapter Bessler-Pendulum), that masses outside of upper cross lever arm of that strange pendulum construction could only function for cushion swinging movements (delay reversal of pendulum swinging). However I didn´t imagine, Bessler would have controlled that large (and probably heavy) wheel with that weakly little crank at system axis.
It was also clear, system´s workload did differ e.g. by that ´stamp-mill´ left side of this picture (four stamps are lifted and fall down one after the other, e.g. for crushing crops). It´s also well known, quite other systems of Free Energy do produce surplus of energy, only when loaded with work. So also Bessler´s wheels could need some basic workload for continious turning (like reported, one could hear knocking stamp-mill trough sealed doors while this machine was running for months).
Also this picture of an other Bessler-Wheel already shows external pendulums, however without these upside cross lever arms. Instead of these, efficiency of that wheel is demonstrated by turning an Archimedes-Screw (water within that bassin is pumped up and flows back into that bassin). It´s obvisious, Bessler here used ´strange´ transmission (even he was clockmaker and familar with wheels and gears). A belt driven by two ´forks´ at system axis turn that pipe via ´four-edged gear-wheel´. Normal conclusion of this design: this Bessler-Wheel did show turning momentum only while certain phases.
We all are bound to idea, wheels have to turn steady, only constant speed is ´good´ kind of movement, like every ´proper´ motor or generator etc. turns. It´s outstanding achievement of Georg Künstler to remove that ´blockade´ concerning Bessler-Wheel and to recognize, also ´bad´ kind of differing turning speeds are usefull, even at main shaft of a system.
So now, historic Bessler-Wheel can be rebuild by everybody, at least this version. Like Bessler obvisiously did construct diverse wheels with diffent technics, lastly will exist lots of solutions for steady turning wheels. Nevertheless, by demonstration of that simple mechanics with ´unbelievable´ results, blockade is broken and quite new applications are offered and will come true.
Workload input or output
Unsteady movement and turnings, since years were subject for many explorers and inventors. For example, at the very beginning of his experiments, Felix Würth realized clear surplus of energy by most simple rotating systems (sorry, my texts and drawings at Download Würth are available only in German). Since months he confirmed my claims about Sling-Effect to be absolutely true, it´s only neccessary to let mass fall outside (and turning speed won´t be reduced, as commonly assumed) and by ´braking-inwards´ surplus of energy is to earn. It won´t take long times until Felix Würth will present complete generators - like some other companies more.
Since years, no professional physican is interested in this matter of facts, nore did check honestly these claims. There is an other fact, presented by physican Dr. Imris Pavel (see chapter Double-Sling and others) with abnormous effects - and nobody did check simple experiment. My conclusion concerning this kind of movement was: a barrier, by pure ´passive´ resistance contributes energy into a turning system, so level of energy in total is increased. With Excenter-Nopp-Gear I proposed similar movements, however included into continuous process (and only few people got it).
Instead of hard crash (sudden impuls), I made different proposals for ´soft´ guiding and braking masses towards inside, alongside excentric walls, e.g. by Crop-Circle-Motor. Only one group did try to construct prototyps of this - as I believe, ideal - machine. However, based on small angles of parts this first model did block, so probably one should use ball-bearings between critical parts. By this design and many other concepts, input of energy isn´t done passively by any fix barrier, but mass is guided inwards by system pushing resp. moving ahead any kind of ´barrier´.
So this idea of breaking-inwards and same time taking-off usable energy, by lots of designs and different concepts already was essential element. Now however, by Georg Künstler and his understanding of Bessler-Wheel, this principle is clearly demonstrated and effects obvisious for everyone: only by intermediate deceleration of gear-rim, effective masses come to higher level of potential energy (which at the following is used - without any losses - to re-accelerate system to original existing status).
At historic Bessler-Wheel, brake-energy was used for lifting different stuff. At system of Künstler-Energie GmbH (see External Links), act of braking does drive an electric generator, not continuously but by regular phases. Instead of using small lever arms at systems with excentric walls, this system demonstrates (like e.g. Felix Würth), systems well allow to take energy off by sharp braking at effective long lever arms. The only ´un-beauty´ to take: discontinuous turning, even at system shaft.
Problem solved - gates are opened
Georg Künstler did a gigantic job by discovering Bessler´s secret by absolutly conclusive solution. At least this version of historic Bessler-Wheel now can be re-constructed. Same time it´s obvisously demonstrated, Perpetuum Mobile do function, even by simple mechanics. As this blockade is removed, naturally there will soon be lots of possiblities for earning Free Energy. Within short time, many suitable concepts will be developed and diverse ´Energy-Generators´ will be available.
My tiny contribution at this story will be some kind of ´mental supplier´, but limited to some few workouts. So next chapter Impuls-Principle and CentripetalpowerspiderI will describe this principle more abstract and deduce first concept (Centri-petal- as valuable answer to flop of my Centri-fugal-powerspiders). At following chapters, some more applications will be mentioned.
Evert / 19.04.2002
| Consequences - Real Machines | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |