Since some years are known some machines with this principle of construction: motor drives flywheel, flywheel drives generator - and generator produces more electric energy than motor needs. By units like these, storage batteries are charged and these batteries serve electric supply for motor and additional consumers - and voltage of batteries keep constant.
These machines did run for days and weeks, some are told to produce energy continuously. Examples are generators of Don Martin (picture left side), Wilson, Kipper, Bedini and others (probably also Tilley). Ten years old girl reproduced a Bedini-conception in 2000, running five days - motive for many researchers for similar experiments.
If these substantial reports are really true, naturally question is: why got these units not ready for mass production, why are these machines not to buy anywhere?
There are lots of proposals for solutions of using Free Energy. Normally these attempts fail because prototypes are not constructed well enough (at least by hobby-researchers or hobby-handcrafts). Here however situation might be vice versa: experiments were done by relative simple resources and did run. As soon however machines were constructed technically perfect, units didn´t run. Best example might be reconstruction of Don-Martin-Generator (see chapter Don Martin and Edge-Ring-Generator).
All experiments did show effects, however one does not know decisive reason of. Surplus could be based on special design of electric constructional elements and circuits, e.g. also on charging batteries by pulsating current (see below). Surplus however could also be based on special design of mechanic equipment. This mechanical aspect is discussed here primarily.
Phenomenal Flywheel
It´s clear: driving normal electric motor direct by normal electric generator, surplus of energy will never come up. Thus surplus of energy of previous systems must be based on flywheel installed between. However: which facts could be abnormal at normal flywheel?
These ´phenomena´ exist: acceleration of wheel already turning demands less energy than same acceleration of wheel previously not turning. Wheels with spikes bended backward are to turn easier (and are to decelerate harder) than wheels with straight spokes or spokes showing ahead in turning direction. If wheels are thrown upward, turning wheels fly faster and higher (and also fall down faster again). I described these facts at several chapters of rotor technics. These facts are well known however scarcely noticed and used.
At chapter Wheels at Tracks moved I described further phenomenon by picture which here is shown by parts as picture EV MSG 02.
Effective masses in shape of turnable wheel is installed at a car. Forces of inertia act different when car with not-turning wheel (C) and car with turning wheel (D) are accelerated or decelerated.
Same effect occurs by abrupt stopping, e.g. if shaft of wheel hit onto a barrier (H, German Hindernis). At not-turning wheel (E) all mechanical energies are ´lost´ (by tension within materials, especially of barrier). At turning wheel (F), naturally car is stopped - however turning of wheel is accelerated (i.e. input of forces by barrier has to remain within system, at least partly by effect of faster turning wheel. Details see previous mentioned chapter).
At chapter Perpetuum Mobile of Third Kind is stated abstract theorem, ´braking-out´ of energy from mechanical rotor-system not at all must result corresponding less energy within system. Previous barrier resp. act of braking contributes energy into total system, which can not disappear - if motion´s process is organized skillful, so this energy-input results not only tension of materials, i.e. is not transferred into heat in total. By skillful handling of flywheel obviously this effect is used at systems discussed here (however not optimum shape up to now).
Principles of Construction
At picture EV MSG 03 at A basic construction is shown schematic. Flywheel (S, German Schwungrad) is driven by motor (M) via V-belt (R, German (Keil-) Riemen). Turning here is assumed clock-wise. Flywheel drives generator (G) via this belt-gear.
Transmission between flywheel and generator preferably would be 1:1, like schematic shown at B. Preferable would also be most simple design of generator, which induces current only twice each revolution, so only each 180 degrees generator demands some more power. Only within these relative short phases, flywheel has really to drive generator, i.e. belt downside is tensioned strongly.
At these phases, generator decelerates turning speed of flywheel. If now bearings of flywheel are fixed within housing not absolutely solid, flywheel is drawn little bit to left side by strongly tensioned belt. This situation schematic is shown at C. Flywheel ´rolls´ at tensioned belt (downside part) some towards right side, so belt upside is slacked little bit.
At flywheels, effective masses naturally should not be concentrated near axis. At previous effects, only masses cross to decelerating force are effective. So it must not be used complete flywheel, but only a beam with two masses (SM, German Schwungmasse) outside at each end, like schematic shown at D. This ´fly-beam´ is connected with generator via belt and transmission-wheels of same size (like upside).
Pulling Force without Slowing down
Now at E is shown phase of higher tension, within which generator ´brakes down´ flywheel. Motion of flywheel towards left side is hold-back downside-left, where belt is in connection with its transmission wheel. Effective mass downside at beam still wants to move towards left, based on inertia. So there comes up a leverarm (dotted line) around fulcrum (DP, German Drehpunkt), which pushes system axis (SA) of flywheel to right side (marked by arrow).
Also effective mass upside at beam thus is thrown towards right side (marked by arrow some longer). This mass will not resist versus this motion, because mass can fly some more straight line towards right side, thus into direction of its inertia (resp. at least mass now moves at circled track of some longer radius). Mass downside is not really delayed by this process, this mass only slings around new turning-point, i.e. comes comes into circled track left-side-upward some earlier (thus moving at curve bended some stronger).
So if at experimental constructions of these systems, bearing of flywheel allows some room-to-move, phasewise tension of belt results swinging of flywheel into direction towards generator. If suspension is ´elastic´ that kind, bearing will swing back into starting position within phases of less tensioned belt. Short deceleration will not result corresponding deceleration of turning speed of flywheel. So motor can keep flywheel at constant rotation (in average) by relative less workload.
Optimum Design
Picture EV MSG 04 schematic sketches essential characteristics for construction of these machines, in order to use ´phenomena´ effects of these special ´fly-beams´.
Effective masses must be installed at most large radius and only two masses opposite are to use (at its best by S-shaped arms bended backward). Correspondingly, generator must be designed so simple to demand high forces only twice each revolution within short phases (sectors marked dark-red at G). Flywheel and generator must turn synchronously, connected via belt-gear (or straight guided chain) by transmission relation of 1:1. Effective mass should be positioned right-angles to generator at phases of high tension resp. forces demanded.
Radius of gear-wheels should be much shorter than radius of effective masses, so previous leverarm can affect around fulcrum at most long distance. Distance between axis of flywheel and generator should be most short, so forces are transferred most direct by downside part of belt (and swinging of belt can not build up counter-swinging effects). Phasewise slacken of upper part of belt is to balance by soft pressure of some tensioning-rollers (RS, German Riemen-Spanner).
Decisive now is, axis of flywheel can move some distance into direction of generator within phases of strong forces. As an example, shaft of flywheel could be guided within sledge (SL, German Schlitten-Lager) and room-to-move is limited by springs. As an alternative solution, shaft of flywheel could be suspended at pendulum arm, where pendulum must hang little bit towards generator and must be allowed to swing some further out.
Shaft of flywheel could also be mounted at suspension downside, if this beam behaves elastic like spring. This design probably will be best, because tension of belt is well to adjust by elastic supporting beam or spring. At any case construction must allow shaft of flywheel to move towards generator at phases of strong forces and must move back to starting position at phases of weak forces.
It´s advantageous to install connections to generator and to motor separate (thus at different levels in axial direction). At one shaft should be installed (one aside the other) transmission-wheel of motor, transmission-wheel of generator and fly-beam (which could be rather wide, e.g. even like its radius). Drive of flywheel schematic is sketched at this picture at B. Length of belt-connection between motor and flywheel keeps most constant, if motor is installed right angles to swinging of flywheel. So here motor is arranged upside of shaft of flywheel.
Motor must not work continuously. Motor should not transfer power onto flywheel at phases of high forces (here at vertical position of flybeam), because thus motor would drive generator directly and previous leverarm-effect could not work. Forces of generator and motor must affect phase-shifted onto flywheel. Motor again should work only at angles most effective (here thus only when flybeam is positioned horizontal, because at other positions come up additional forces, non-productive however to overcome). Advantage position for motor´s work is shown at this picture at C. Only at this situation leverarms are most effective for masses both sides.
It´s also advantageous, if driving forces of motor work at larger radius (here marked by transmission-wheels some larger. Naturally turning momentum of any motor is equal, no matter at which length of leverarm work is done. Here however no steady workload is to do, but only short mechanical impulses are to transfer onto flywheel, so its slightly diminished angles speed comes back to average turning speed. Instead of normal electric motor, drive like linear motor would do good job, working only at sectors marked dark-green (resp. only within phases much shorter) and delivering demanded turning momentum.
At picture EV MSG 05 once more schematic is sketched an example of design. Flywheel with its both masses (SM) is build by S-shaped arms. Generator (G) is arranged at right side, driven by belt-gear (GR). Motor (M) is arranged upside and phasewise is driving flywheel via belt-gear (MR). System axis (SA) is mounted at swivable beam (TR). This beam could be drawn to left side by spring (here not drawn), so belt to generator is tensioned all times. Elements shown are to arrange at different axial levels (and finally of course, symmetric construction is to realize).
Optimum Realization
By experiments of diverse researchers efficiency of some 300 percents mostly are mentioned. At these units up to now was not detected, why surplus results. As now mechanical effect is well founded, these results (and more) should be to achieve constantly by consequent realization.
Upside at picture EV MSG 02 is mounted turnable wheel at a car (D). When car as a whole is accelerated, there are no negative affects concerning turning speed of wheel, also not when car is decelerated (F). Masses actually at horizontal position are not involved, only masses vertical to car´s way are interesting (thus only previous flybeam is used).
At previous concept, forces affect not at shaft but short distance below and some left (at fulcrum DP of picture EV MSG 03 at E). If at phases of high forces, downside mass is decelerated little bit, corresponding acceleration of upward mass results via leverarm-effect discussed upside. Turning momentum of flywheel in total thus keeps constant. In spite of this energy-constance additional force is involved. This force affects onto system-part flywheel form outside, by weight resp. workload of system-part generator.
This principle I defined as ´Perpetuum Mobile of Third Kind´: out off mechanical system energy is to ´brake-out´ without corresponding energy-loss of this system-part (here flywheel). ´Deceleration-power´ is usable at second system-part (here generator) as ´acceleration-power´, here for overcoming resistance while induction of current comes up.
I often tried to design total autonomously turning wheel. Several times I tried to achieve intermediate storage of power (e.g. of gravity) within springs, so phase-shifted power could work at better angles or leverarms. Now here aim is no totally autonomous turning flywheel. Intermediate storage of energy here is done via batteries and parts of energy are introduced back to system via motor some later. So here are realized strict separation of functions and exact timing of power effects gets possible.
Mechanical energy of braking-out is available in total at generator and is transferred into corresponding amount of electric energy. Braking-out-energy however does not result corresponding delay of turning motion of flywheel masses. Motor must do workload only to compensate friction losses (of gears and elastic bearing of shaft). Most part of electric energy however is available for externals usage.
Exact swinging Charge
There are also machines with constructional elements of motor, flywheel and generator, however these elements mounted at only one shaft. So swinging of flywheel relative to generator is not possible. However I suspect at least at some cases, coils are not absolutely fix installed within housing. If coils have room to swing little bit ahead and back in turning sense, faster relative speed results while current is induced, so comparable effect comes up.
Practically all experiments use some special design of circuits for controlling electric impulses, between generator and battery like between battery and motor. Actually I don´t want to publish proposals for solutions. There are, at least some times, clear over-unity-effects. I want to contribute explaining real reason at the following.
By these systems, again comes up question, where from surplus of energy results resp. It´s often stated surplus should come off ´sea of space-energy´. As significant characteristic is assumed, batteries keep cold at process of charging - which results ´naive´ conclusion, energy would be drawn off environment-heat (thus working anyway like heat-pumps - in my opinion total wrong understanding of real processes).
I want to remember at statements at chapter Electrostatic-Electricitygenerator. There at section ´Ether-Physics´ and following I mentioned, charges are relative large ether vortices, which are pressed onto surface of conductors by universal swinging motions of ether. If anywhere at conductor exists high density of charges, these vortices are ´pressed-flat´ alongside conductor, appearing as current (into direction of less density of charges).
Here for example ether-motions in shape of charges are produced by ether-vortices of permanentmagnet while moving cross to conductor. This accumulation of charges afterwards (does not flow, but) is pressed down into areas of less charge-density. If now electric or electronic elements and circuits are installed skillful, it´s absolutely possible charges slosh to and fro at conductor and pressure of Free Ether builds up electron´s swinging. This effect is achieved by previous systems, at least partly and some times. Nevertheless grave problem exists.
Bubbling Chemistry
Pulsating swinging of electrons at conductors exists (build up by ether-pressure) and some phase-shifted exists swinging of ions within battery. If all swinging motions would be resonant, naturally comes up stronger swinging, i.e. more energy is pushed into battery than ´originally´ available. These effects are well known, nevertheless are not absolutely steady resp. are not to reproduce continuously.
Swinging of electrons at conductors is relative steady to produce. Charges (or what´s called electrons) are swinging pattern in complete resonance with swinging of Free Ether. Current runs alongside conductors by light speed, at area of conductor´s surfaces, prevailingly outside of surface (´snake-like´ crawling of electrons within conductor´s material is only secondary appearance). Charges are motions of ether within Free Ether, dimensions of swinging are different, nevertheless by immediate harmonic resonance.
Totally different are relations of chemical processes between electrodes within acid of batteries. There motions of ions occur within ´thick soup´, ions have to move through accumulations of atoms and molecules larger by billions. Motions run far below light speed. These processes are not constant in time, results depend on many parameters. For example not all kind of batteries are usable, batteries actually show different voltages, processes phasewise run controversy, temperature of acid and thus normal molecular motions are changing, bubbles come up, transition of solid material into fluid (and vice versa) is no steady process, batteries of different ´age´ show different behaviour of materials etc.
So one can not expect, these chemical processes run within clearly defined cycles in order to come into complete resonance with clear and steady swinging of electrons alongside conductors. So at least by batteries available today, problems of timing will exist all times. This is real reason, why these systems can not get ready for mass production, not even one system does run really steady all times.
Building up of swinging charges could well be used, however without including batteries into swing-circuits. Timing could also be controlled without mechanical parts. However, also these Solid-State-Solutions are not ready for mass production up to now, probably again caused by tuning problems (which are reliable to solve only by better understanding of ether and real essence of electromagnetic appearances).
Simple and feasible Solution
As no accumulator e.g. of drill-tools nor handys behave really reliable, my proposal is absolutely clear: take simple way of solution. Here obviously flywheel is system-indispensable - and it´s easy to optimise flybeam´s shape like function by criteria mentioned upside. These machines need only simple constructional elements, motor and generator of most simple design, using simple direct-current - however pulsating. Batteries are to charge without dependence of complete synchrony of electronic swinging and chemical reactions and processes.
I hope previous considerations contribute to experiments by designs corresponding to these principles and obvious source of energy now becomes usable continuously and steady by mass products or by modular assembly systems for everyone.
Evert / 28.02.2005
| Consequence - Real Machines | Perpetuum Mobile | Index / Sitemap |