This chapter will remind some phenomenas with concern to actual subject. By the way, I will have to ´complain´ about expert´s indifference. Essential result of this chapter however will be, to define prerequisites and effects of mechanical perpetuum mobile - self-running machines like Bessler´s wheel.
Sling-effect
Already in 1999 by this picture I described problem of slinging as raised by Dr. Habbel. His and my claims were and are, movements at spiral tracks will show surplus of energy. As all experts do know that´s impossible, no expert could be found to calculate exactely power effects by slinging.
A Sling-Effect will result cause centrifugal forces there are not completely neutralized. To a driving power thus centrifugal forces will add vectorially, resulting a larger component than each of both original forces.
Opposite to concentric movements, here radius will vary and also turning points will wander within space. In nature, there are no movements at circled but only at spiral tracks (while axis tumble around in any direction). Like this, nature does produce continously more complex structures e.g. higher level of energy. Universe won´t die ´dead of heat´ as commonly believed.
This effect is used at many constructional concepts here. This process also occures at Bessler-machines of chapters above. As trigger are used ´free´ available energies of gravity and inertia resp. centrifugal force. These ´useless´ energies are transfered to sensefull usage by skillful organisation of movements.
Double-sling-effect
By following picture EVGM 41 at spring 2000, I rose the question of unbalancy of powers and momentums, Dr. Pavel Imris did mention at a patent description. The experiment is quite simple: a mass (MP) turns around an axis (SA) at large radius (R1), a barrier (H, German Hindernis) is inserted, so afterwards mass will turn around it by shorter radius (R2). The question is: which amount will show kinetic energies (E1 / E2) and turning momentums before / behind the barrier?
Within eighteen month I got only three experts to look at this patent description. First physican did accuse his doctorated colleague of primitive mistakes in calculations. Second had grave doubts about empiric values documented. Finally third physican did confirm, turning momentums before / behind barrier wouldn´t be same amount.
To whom a layman like me can trust? I don´t bother about experts calculations, using speed as a simple factor or by its square. I only know by sure, e.g. common definition of mass can´t be true and within nature there won´t anything relate purely linear nore by square. Known formulas will well work at technical problems at the earth. However, already at tracks of satellites there are strange ´anomalities´. Extrapolated by light-years into space, results are absolutely wrong - cause formulas don´t represent real essence of occurances.
Now experts won´t go on reading, convinced of my total ignorance. That´s no problem. Ignoring facts by experts however, that´s tragic. For example it´s a fact, acceleration-from-rest and acceleration-within-motion and deceleration same amount of speed - does take different amounts of energy. Even experiments easily can be done at any lab with metrological equipment, no expert does.
Explantions of this phenomena e.g. at chapter Ether, Gravity and Inertia are described. However ´phantom-bodies´ published there still is thinking by stable bodies moving within ether. Only at later chapters of this ´Ether-Continuum-Theory´ more correct are described only movements within movements. There is no ´mass´ nore ´materia´, but only movements of that single real matter of ether. Special movement-structures of ether only give impression of materia. Mass of that ´materia´ however encloses much more space of demanded balancing-movements. Volume of ether moved like this does vary by speed of ´material body´.
At level of material bodies can´t exist closed systems, cause everything is embedded within the ether. So a ´system´ must be defined larger. Here at this example of double-sling experiment, turning momentums will only be balanced when work / energy / performance contributed by the barrier is included.
Again experts accuse me to be an ignorant when asserting this barrier (like every spoke at wheels) will do workload (who doubts may work as a spoke or represent that barrier). I don´t bother, how physicans will name that contribution of that barrier (or a spoke), however this contribution mustn´t be ignored, cause it´s important factor of this system (and other systems too, see below).
I don´t bother, a Perpetuum Mobile of first or second level will be impossible. I just try to design ´something-always-moving-by-itself´ - using free available energies of system universe (like nature does show numberless - word by word - Perpetuum Mobiles).
Excenter-knop-gear
By that sharp hit at the barrier above, energy is wasted by tensions within material. That´s why I did try by diverse concepts to do function of that barrier (resp. of spokes) ´elastic´ kind. Already three years ago I did design e.g. that Excenter-Knop-Gear (available at download Schwungsysteme within my workouts to experiments of Felix Würth, there picture 46 and 47, only in German language).
Wheel upside does show variing length of radius and does roll at an uneven track, so wheel´s axis can move horizontally. Below, that track is winded around a system axis that kind, wheel´s axis move concentrically around system axis. Turning speed of rotorarm around system axis is constant while turning of rotors around their axis are variing, based at that changing relation of ´transmission-gear´. Progressively sling procedure above is achieved. At a knop, turning of rotor around its axis abruptly will slow down, so energy via rotorarm is brought into system as turning momentum.
Up to now, no single expert was interested in this concept, no expert could be brought to mention criticism, nore a model was constructed, nore energy-balance was checked by simulation programs. Experts are not allowed to think about energy-´surplus´.
Würth-Centrifugal-Pump
Last year finally, Felix Würth succeeded to demonstrate this effect, using simple gear wheels instead of complex knop-gear above. Differing turning speed of rotors there are done by control-movements of a central gear wheel. By a simple model of this Würth-Swing-System many people did convince themselves of that effect.
By ´pumping motions´ this system can be turned up incredibly fast within some seconds. For controlling the system, a lever arm must be moved ahead and back, thus in sum input is null. Meanwhile this fact is also approved practically by better constructed models. Nevertheless, control units of that Würth-Systems are hard to realize, no matter which technics are used.
It´s also proved, at higher turning speeds of rotors, angles speeds must vary only minimum size. So not at all these huge knops are demanded like shown at knop-gear above. By my conciderations, control of that excenter-knop-gear could be done by pure mechanics via uneven gear wheels. With this picture I suggested for example, how normal ´apple-shaped´ and symmetrical track of effective masses could be transformed into an asymmetric track, thus by only small variation of angles speeds an effective turning momentum can be achieved.
Again it´s interesting task for every student of technic-science, to write a simulation program using well known formulas of mechanics. On the other hand, by findings of last weeks concerning Bessler-principles, now rotor-systems can be designed using only simple gear wheels (as described later).
Organisation of forces
Indeed, transformation of free available forces into usable forces is only a question of skillful organisation. This is clearly approved e.g. by effect of sails as described in article Why the sail won´t pull (only in German, Warum das Segel nicht zieht).
Wind there is used only for tiggering, in order to structure normal, chaotical movements of molecules (by suction at the backside of the sail, while at the frontside normal air pressure will weight onto surface). So multiple of wind-power is achieved for lift and drive (even only a small component of forces shows into ship´s direction).
At all systems mentioned above, also two forces are combined: gravity and inertia. Opposite to kinetic energy of molecular movements, these forces are well directed already. Gravity all times effects vertical downward, inertia all times effects in direction of actual movement. At a movement around an axis, inertia will result centrifugal forces all times in radial directions.
Like molecular movement, gravity is a steady power. Opposite to wind, centrifugal forces can be produces as we like it, practically with no costs. So it´s only the problem to combine both forces skillfully by organisation of sensefull motion´s processes. Analog to this, at rotor systems steady centrifugal forces (by turning around a system axis) and variable centrifugal forces (by turning of masses around a rotor axis) can be combined.
Resulting forces
At picture EV SKM 12 gravity- and centrifugal-forces are shown. At this picture upside (A) a mass (MP) is turning around a system axis (SA), guided by a spoke (here not shown) concentrically with constant angles speed.
At each position gravity forces (GK, German Gravitationskraft) will weight vertically downwards, centrifugal forces (ZK, German Zentrifugalkraft) will show into each radial direction. By vectorial addition of both forces a resulting force (RK, German Resultierende Kraft) will exist, however showing in diverse directions. Dotted circle will mark, to where these forces have effect at a whole: symmetrically and (in relation to system axis) shifted downward by amount of mass weight.
At this picture downside (B) mass again will turn around system axis, now however guided by a free swinging pendulum. Gravity (GK) will show same effect, but centrifugal forces (ZK) now will show different amount based at differing angles speeds.
Phase shifting
Resulting forces (RK) upside are dented inside (in relation to dotted circle), downside are beated outside. Thus these forces do show an ´eightshaped´ track versus average - as mentioned by Harald Chmela at chapter above Mechanical oszillating circuit.
As an important hint he there mentioned, build-up of swinging can be achieved only by phase shifting. Here by now, there is no phase shifted, cause track of mass like directions of effective forces still are symmetrical. So it´s task to store ´surplus´ of forces for some times in order to put it back to the system phase-shifted.
Spring mechanism
Within last weeks second important hint to me was multiple named term ´hard-soft´ of all viewers of Remote Viewing sessions above. These are stupid words - or exact description of essential characteristics of any suspension mechanism.
I often made conciderations with constructional element of springs. However, springs can be build with most different characteristics, so behavior and effects are hard to rate. On the other hand, springs are heavy strained parts, can break and produce troubles. Whenever possible so I searched for other solutions. This meanwhile-storage of forces for example can also be done by Pendulum-Control resp. Bessler-Pendulums were installed (at least at one version of his wheels).
On the other hand I always did know, centrifugal forces are really destroyed by tension within spoke´s material. If given forces should not be destroyed but sensefully used, so no stable spokes shall be used, so tension shall not be constant all times, so angles speeds or radius must vary. All these demands automatically are covered when spokes are supplemented by springs or spokes are replaced by any elastically working element.
Tension and slacken
At chapter Mechanical oszillating circuit a spring was designed, copying processes while turning up a loop-swing. At picture EV SKM 14 positions of mass points (MP) from animation there are shown once more. This track is not defined by experiments nore calculations, thus won´t be optimum by sure. Nevertheless this picture may explain demanded processes of movements and effects of forces as well.
Distances of mass points to system axis (SA) do vary while a turning, so masses no longer move at concentric track. Gravity (GK) still effects vertically downward at each position. Instead of centrifugal forces here however at first each inertia power (TK, rough guessed amount and direction) is marked and resulting force (RK) as well.
Inertia not at all is only a potential energy (like centrifugal forces are not only ´seemingly´). As here mass is movable in radial directions, resulting force of weight and inertia does define direction and speed of mass in direct manner. Only effect on resp. from spring mechanism will determine track and speed of mass in addition (as pendulum mechanism is looked to be weight- and frictionless by theoretical concideration).
Asymmetry
Finally by a second step (at this picture below) resulting force (RF) can be divided into a radial component of centrifugal force (FK) and a component showing into turning sense (DM, practically each turning momentum, German Drehmoment). Compared with pictures above (of steady turning wheel and free swinging pendulum with constant radius) here quite other relations do result.
At upside positions (from nearby 3 to 11 o´clock) resulting forces do show towards inside, thus also centrifugal forces (blue lines, showing towards system axis) are negative. By gravity here masses weight on the spokes resp. spring will be pressed inside.
From position nearby 11 o´clock weight can contribute to accelerate turning, while weight of mass will press less towards radial direction. So the spring can slacken towards outside, i.e. can move mass to a larger radius, so weight now can effect at larger lever arm, so turning speed will be accelerated. Starting form nearby 10 o´clock, inertia (green lines, tangential to curve of track) will show towards outside with increasing amount. From position at 9 o´clock resulting forces will effect mass falling down to larger radius of spoke, now there centrifugal component of forces will exist (blue lines, showing towards outside).
These centrifugal forces will impress onto the spring, which will be tensioned more and more. Correponding counter-pressure will guide vertically falling of mass to rihgt side, so movement´s track will be bended into turning sense of system, lastly into circle track.
Trampolin-effect
However, circled track not at all should be arrived already at 6 o´clock-position. That spring should be dimensioned that kind, maximum tension (or a fix support) will be arrived nearby 5 o´clock. There, whole centrifugal power will weight on spoke like at any normal circled track. Same time, there inertia will already show upwards, i.e. partly counter gravity direction. Resulting forces thus will quickly decrease, so spring will soon be able to slacken towards inside again.
At continuous circled track, deviation of mass into each tangential direction will occure permanently. Here however, mass will fall down from upside-inside towards outside-down, suddenly a peak load will occure, tension spring at its maximum - like a trampolin-jumber will tension rubber strings of trambolin-net. Short moment later, also rather suddenly spring slackens again, based on changed direction and reduced amount of effective resulting forces.
Here this process will occure nearby 5- to 4-o´clock-position. Cause green curve here does show result of the sping´s expansion, at this phase nearby no radial forces are marked. However, only mass will move without radial component of forces. Slacken of spring however must be supported by the spoke, i.e. radial forces will weight at the system also at this phase.
Double sling
Here at first there will be a downward sling process, done by gravity and supported by slacken of spring between 11- to 9-o´clock-position. By compression of spring at following phase, track is spirally bended to right side, so most downward position of mass is nearby 5 o´clock, the end of downward sling phase.
Second there will follow an upward sling phase, started by circled track, assisted by slacken of spring. That acceleration of mass will occure into radial direction. However, until 3-o´clock-position this direction does show upwards, vectorially added to already upward (first circled) showing movement in general. So mass will move upward at an inward bended spiral track.
By laws of constance of energy and momentum will result correspondingly faster angles speeds. As the mass will go on moving to smaller radius at its upper positions, a turning momentum will result towards the pendulum mechanism. Instead of ´unproductive´ work of stable spokes, thus a flexible spoke will store energy of heavy load phases (based on free available gravity and inertia) into springs tension and phase-shifted will produce usable turning momentum.
Double work
At previous chapter was discussed, how and why a child can turn-up a swing. At end of downward phase and at beginning of upward phase, center of mass must be guided at most large radius. Weight there must be hold counter gravity and centrifugal forces by arm´s power. At the end of upward phase, center of mass must be moved most near to system axis. Mainly the body must be drawn up into radial direction, again by pulling of arms. So the child has to bring in energy, nice swinging will result, but lastly energy will be ´lost´.
Here at first phase of work, heavy loads are transfered into tension of spring. Function demanded will be done same kind, however given forces are not destroyed but conserved. This energy now is available for second phase of work. Function demanded will be done and (after system is started) instead of further turning-up swinging a corresponding amount of energy is free available - without input or consumption of commonly used energy resources.
Bessler-Principle
Prerequisites and effects of basic concept could be outlined like this: