At a workshop of Göde-Institut for Gravity Research, I first met Rainer Schmieg and got some interesting conversations. This man has profound knowledges at some subjects, made diverse researches theoretically and practically, keeps some patents. By the way, he developed a turbine - which is ´resonant´ to some of my projects.
Objectives of this chapter are to put together diverse aspects in order to design an autonomously working turbine, e.g. for driving an electric generator.
Flux-controlled Resonance-Turbine
 |
 |
|
RS SRT 01 shows a cut through this construction. Fluid (air or water) with pressure enters these both pipes, running around within channels of blue parts. From there, fluid moves into nozzles (red), e.g. both sides each three nozzles, which show inwards and some ahead (in turning sense of system).
At the center, a rotor (light blue) is installed, which in principle is shaped like two cones. Within surfaces aside of rotor, drillings are made like ´bags´ (practically these holes function as turbine-vanes). Jet of nozzles hit onto radially showing surface of these holes, flux is redirected and thus affecting turning momentum onto rotor.
As this rotor is hit symmetrically both sides and into symmetric directions, rotor is rotating ´free´ within space. It´s astonishing, rotor must not be balanced exactely nore must be beared and guided by any shaft.
RS SRT 02 shows a cut through real model of a real turbine. Rotor and its holes here even better are to see. An electric generator e.g. could be installed within areas aside of rotor.
Decisive criterium however is, outlet of nozzle phasewise is opened resp. closed. Whenever nozzle passes hole of rotor, fluid flows into ´vanes´ and thus producing turning momentum onto rotor. If however nozzle is opposite to plane surface of rotor (between holes), flux within nozzle is stopped. So back-stroke (recoil) within nozzle phasewise will occure.
RS SRT 03 schematically shows cross-sectional view of nozzle, right side is inlet, left side is outlet. By differing blue colours, at the one hand differing speeds are marked, on the other hand pressures of backstroke.
Pressure wave of backstroke is spreading backwards within conus of this room, until pressure is reflected at backside surfaces. If speed of rotor and distances of waves are corresponding, within this resonance-room will come up still standing (resp. ´trembling-ahead´) waves. By open nozzle, thus at inlet of turbine is available not only given pressure of fluid, but in addition kinetic energy of this pressure-wave will hit onto vanes of turbine.
Effects of resonante movements are well known and are applied at various subjects of technics (e.g. for throughput of masses within combustion motors, for producing sound and some applications more). So it´s absolutely clear, why this turbine is running faster - ever by less mass-throughput - than ´admitted´ (in relation to originally given pressure at input of machine).
Frustrating Facts
Rainer Schmieg got patent of this invention already in 1995. Same time, he could present running models. He is well known man in diverse sections of industry. Nevertheless, he couldn´t find interest of companies nore of the authorities nore of science institudes for his ´Flux-controlled Resonance-Turbine´ (German ´Strömungsgeführte Resonanzturbine´), even e.g. at his website he mentioned diverse, concrete applications for this technology.
Rainer Schmieg is stretched as manager of a company for ultrasound-technology, did researches about this turbine only by the way, also today has not capacity for production and marketing of this turbine by himself (but is offering his patent for others e.g. at his website since years).
It´s absolutely frustrating to see, how inventions are ignored, even they use well known effects (here resonance), are not only founded theoretically but demonstrated practically. Obvisiously at some fields, better stuff indeed is regarded as ´enemy´ of good stuff - and ´danger´ best is responded by ignoring.
Inspiring facts
I was inspired by meeting Rainer Schmieg, cause once more I got confirmation for one of my ideas. As I only can produce theoretical workouts, I am glad all times, some of my claims are confirmed by other inventors or even are realized already.
Rainer Schmieg e.g. had done patents and models of his Resonance-Turbine, long before I started with my conciderations about Fluid-Technology. As well-educated machine-designer, he also had developed much better solution than I could work out. Ungrudgingly I acknowledge these facts, as I only am interested in pushing subject of Free Energy. That´s why I here describe Schmieg´s invention once more - and feel free to mention some additional hints, so this senseful techology might come up to be realized.
 |
 |
 |
At chapter Backstroke-Turbine I tried to transfere backstroke e.g. of Hydrostatic Ram (schematically shown by EV DLWT 12) at rotating system. I studied function of ´lamellas´ at Schauberger´s Home-Power-Station (again inspired by colleague).
So I could explain, why Schauberger some of his machines called ´Re-pulsine´ (as he didn´t describe this name anywhere). I was ´frustrated´ somehow, as circles of Implosion-explorers and Schauberger-community were not interested in this explanation nore did pay attention to my proposals.
Like Schauberger did design his machines by most complex shapes, so my ´Backstroke-Turbine´ had rather difficult constructional elements - opposite to simple resonance-chamber of Rainer Schmieg.
Accelerating effect of phasewise closed nozzles, I also pointed out as essential characteristics of wave-shaped designs of Schauberger, e.g. at chapter Pulsation-Turbine with this picture EV DLWT 32.
There, turning fluid is accelerated by backstroke into direction ahead. Within turning rotor, faster turning fluid thus results acceleration effect of system.
However, my deduced designs again were as complex as e.g. Schauberger´s ´flying saucers´.
At previous designs (like at Schauberger-Repulsine) nozzles are turning as parts of rotor. Opposite, nozzles of Schmieg´s Resonance-Turbine are still standing in space, only rotor with its vanes are turning.
Meanwhile, I had done many conciderations about rotating systems with pure mechanical elements and had learned about phasewise redirection into circled tracks. Analogly to these mechanical systems, at chapter Schauberger and Edge-Ring-Turbine I managed to design a machine rather simple.
Process of movements are shown by this animation (as view top-down). A central cylinder of water (blue) is turning (based on tangential inlets at top of cylinder). Water leaves cylinder downside only phasewise (by fixed sheet with holes, black) and produces turning momentum at vanes of rotor (red). At the other hand, nozzles phasewise are closed, flux of water can only escape into direction ahead, i.e. turning of water cylinder mentioned upside is accelerated.
Overpressure-Pump
At many designs, Schauberger draw and described ´pressure- or overpressor-areas´. Nevertheless, function of these pressure-tanks always remained vague (probably cause Schauberger called suction primary, on the other hand he often told, within machines much stronger pressures e.g. than at combustion engines could be achieved - by most simple parts but right kind of movements). After long conciderations, I got convicted, Schauberger by compressed air wanted to pump up water within his systems.
At EV DLWT 01 schematically is shown basic design, which is described in details at chapter Pneumatic-Water-Turbine. Again, I was ´frustrated´ somehow, as practically no single collegue picked up this idea. That´s why I do point out this essential effect once more.
All machines mentioned above have one grave disadvantage: narrow openings of nozzles (only millimeters). So these turbines won´t work with natural waters (cause nozzles or filters would be closed soon by impurities). So these turbines practically are to use only by closed, autonomous circuit of fluids (like Schauberger´s ´Heimkraftwerk´ (home-energy-station). Within these turbines, water must be allowed to flow off (resp. fall downwards), thus at the following water must be pumped upward again.
At Pneumatic-Water-Turbine of this picture e.g., water moves within channels resp. turbine vanes (TS, German Turbinenschaufeln) bended backwards, thus driving rotor by backstroke. Water flows out of nozzles (DÜ, German Düse) and falls down into water tank (WA). Back upwards, water is pressed within a ´lift-pipe´ (SR, German Steigrohr), based on overpressure within area of compressed air (DL, German Druckluft) upside of water surface. After starting system (exactely described in chapter mentioned above) circuit of water will go on continuously and permanent turning momentum will exist.
It´s clear: within upside area of compressed air, at any place same static pressure is spread equally. This pressure same time penetrates waters equally, so practically everywhere same static pressure exists. Now however I insist in assertion, water nevertheless will move out of nozzles, circiut above will go on and on and engine will produce permanently usable energy.
Not only assertions
My conciderations and claims about phasewise closed nozzles were realized by Rainer Schmieg, long before I began with Fluid-Technologies (and I presented upside Resonance-Turbine, immediately after I got knowledge about). Some weeks ago, my statements about effect of suction were confirmed impressively by Jürgen Schatz with his ´Windhamster´ (and I reported about).
Within last months, several other experts did verify theoretically like practically some further statements of my Fluid-Technology (but at the moment I won´t report about, as some collegues yet have not finished projects or patent applications).
So readers are invited, not only to notice statements already confirmed, but to check honestly also following assertions and arguments.
Shielding of Nozzles
At EV DLWT 41 at A schematically is shown a nozzle (DÜ), e.g. tip of garden hose, off which water flows (from right to left side). Alongside that nozzle and water jet, movement (C and D) of air will come up, shaped like long stretched vortice ring.
At EV DLWT 41 at B, core of this vortice is made as massive element (E and F), shaped like a ring with elliptic cross-section. By this part, air vortice is stabilized and is turning further on, even water jet abruptly is stopped. This flux of air shields opening of nozzle against given static air pressure.
If water jet (e.g. with two bar pressure) is guided into hermetically closed tank, water will go on flowing out of nozzle, if within tank also overpressure (e.g. same tow bar) exists. Water jet will enter tank also, if air within tank e.g. will show ten bar overpressure.
At the one hand, water is much heavier than air, water in movement thus shows much stronger kinetic energy than air moved. On the other hand, here nozzle is protected by air vortice above, i.e. static air (over-) pressure can not penetrade into nozzle nore can affect areas backside of nozzle.
Shielding by Stator
At EV DLWT 42 shielding above is transfered to a rotating system. Nozzle (DÜ) is arranged within a rotor (RO), which here is drawn only sectionally. At this turbine, water is guided at center of rotor, afterwards flowing outside within channels showing backwards. So turning momentum is produced by reaction resp. backstroke at frontside walls of channels.
Function of upside massive ring, here is done by solid elements (C and D) of housing. These parts in principle are shaped like halfs of ellipses. By most simple shape, this stator would exist as an inner and an outer sheet with holes, arranged shifted.
At A, water jet moves between both parts, and water will move alongside wall (of part C). Water jet pulls air with his movement, so between both parts, again air movement (E) will come up. Water moves backwards (in turning sense of rotor), so between both shields of stator like outside of outer shield will exist air flux (green arrows) running around stator.
At B, this section of rotor is marked after 15 degrees turning (clock-wise). By inner side of part C, now nozzle is closed. So within nozzle resp. resonance-chamber (here not drawn) will come up backstroke mentioned above (thus turning momentum onto rotor).
So, also by closed nozzle, previous accelerated air movements (F) naturally will go on between parts of this stator. So, if nozzle is opened next time, static pressure of air is shielded, can not affect backwards into nozzle.
Shielding by Rotor
At EV DLWT 43 an alternative construction of turbines schematically is marked. Nozzles (DÜ) now are installed stationary within housing (GE, German Gehäuse). Water flows out nozzles and hits onto ´turbine vanes´ (TS) of rotor (RO), which is turnably around system axis (SA). Housing like rotor here are drawn only by parts.
At A, nozzle is opened versus rotor, so water jet can hit onto frontside wall of turbine vane, is redirected there, thus turning momentum onto rotor is transfered. Opening of rotor is shaped like round hole, thus turning air vortice (E) will come up.
At B, rotor is drawn after 15 degrees turning (now counter clock-wise). Nozzle is positioned opposite to wall of rotor, so nozzle is closed. Within nozzle will come up wanted backstroke, resp. pressure wave will run backwards through resonance-chamber (here not drawn).
Within this round opening of rotor (shaped like ´signalling-whistle´) further on this air vortice (F) will turn around, e.g. also driven by outer parts of air moving slower. If within center of vortice, massive core (G) is installed, vortice will be stationary (analog to garden hose upside at EV DLWT 41 by this elliptic ring E and F). Directely opposite of nozzle, flux is directed outwards, i.e. nozzle is protected versus static pressure. As nozzle is opened next, water jet can freely hit onto turbine vane.
Constructional Variations
So it´s no question, nozzles can be shielded versus over-pressure. Effect is clear like lift of surf-sails or at any wing of aircrafts. It´s only neccessary to initiate flux alongside a surface (here alongside opening of nozzle), which protects surface from static pressure in general.
Now here are objectives to design autonomous running turbine, which produces turning momentum based on backstroke resp. resonance resp. ´standing´ wave of pressure. By turning flux, static pressure is to reduce at opening of nozzle. Different constructional versions are possible (like e.g. diverse examples upside already show).
Schauberger mostly did try to realize accelerating effect by constructional elements of rotor. Analogly for example, I designed upside mentioned Backstroke- and Pulsation-Turbines, with rather complex elements.
Finally at previous Edge-Ring-Turbine, accelerating effect was done within central part of housing, while transfere of enery was done at simple, outer rotor. Rainer Schmieg now demonstrated with his Resonance-Turbine, how simple acceleration outside is to organize and energy is to transfere onto central rotor.
Above this, turbines are to drive by gaseous or liquid fluids as medium. An autonomous turbine, won´t work using only water (at least not by technology discussed here, nevertheless however with technology of Tides-Energy-Station). Using only compressed air, a turbine probably could work. An optimum however will be, using water (cause it´s heavy, i.e. shows strong kinetic forces) in combination with compressed air (cause it´s easy to move and especially for pump-function mentioned above).
So at the following, only Pneumatic-Water-Turbines are discussed, by three versions of rotors. First however, basic construction of resonance-chamber is to talk about.
Resonance-Chamber
At EV DLWT 44 at first, rotor and housing (GE) is shown analog to previous picture (both only by parts), left side by cross-sectional view, right side by longitudinal cross-sectional view. Nozzle (DÜ) is arranged within central part of housing (GE), while rotor (RO) with its turbine vanes (TS), outside of this part of housing, turn around system axis (SA).
Now here in addition, inlet (ZU, German Zufluß) and resosance-chamber (RR, German Resonanzraum) are drawn. Conus-like walls of resonance-chamber lead to narrow opening of nozzle. At circled backside of resonance-chamber, pressure wave of backstroke (based on closing of nozzle) is reflected. Within backside wall of resonance-chamber, opening of inlet is installed, which however will take maximum one third of this ´mirror-surface´.
At my Fluid-Technology, I pointed out, kinetic energy of fluid-movements, at its best is transfered into mechanical turning momentum, if only thin film of fluid is redirected at turbine vanes (cause only molecules direct in contact with surface can affect pressure, while molecules further backside might be redirected by already redirected flux, thus without affecting any pressure at turbine surface).
So nozzles shouldn´t be shaped by round cross-section, but would make sense to be shaped as long and thin ´slots´. Correspondingly, following resonance-chamber shouldn´t be shaped like round conus, but in shape of a narrow and high cylinder with cross-section like circle-segment.
Inlet into resonance-chamber could be a round opening at its backside or could also be a long slot (like marked here as an example). Inlet to resonance-chamber, here is guided downwards (and could show also other shape, see below). Length of resonance-chamber like length of inlet-pipe are to arrange based on well known formulas, thus within whole system resonant swinging is achieved. Water within these constructional elements will ´tremble´ ahead towards rotor.
Rotor outside or inside
By these pictures, basic constructions of previous principle schematically are shown, each upside by cross-sectional view and below by longitudinal cross-sectional view. At EV DLWT 45 rotor (RO) is arranged outside of inlet, at EV DLWT 46 rotor is arranged inside of inlets.
Now also are marked areas of water (WA) within downside tank, while space upside is filled up with compressed air (DL). By some bar pressure, enormous ´height of falling´ water is to ´simululate´.
Advantageous at version with outer rotor (EV DLWT 45) is, water can fall free outside and air within turbine vanes (TS) is slinged outwards by rotor´s turning. Thus already by centrifugal forces, at opening of nozzles (DÜ) exists reduced static pressure. So previous discussed shielding of nozzle versus static air pressure is guarantee without any problems.
At the other hand, given high pressure of air upside of water surface, presses water into inlets (ZU) of resonance-chamber (RR). Here, different areas of elements are marked by different colours. At running mode, naturally inlet and resonance-chamber and nozzle are all filled up with water.
Disadvantageous at this version with outer rotor is bearing and guidance of rotor. It´s not neccessary, rotor is absolutely direct at surface of housing, nore special sealing elements are demanded. Pressures within this narrow slot are changing thus fast and intensive, sufficient ´bulky´ water film will exist between surfaces of housing and rotor. Nevertheless, symmetric bearing of rotor would be better technical solution.
If rotor is arranged at center, bearing of rotor is well done, like e.g. at previous picture EV DLWT 46 schematically is shown. Outside within housing (GE) is space enough for many inlets, here e.g. are drawn twelve and also twelve turbine vanes (TS) are installed within rotor.
However, here centrifugal forces work versus channels, i.e. water won´t flow aside (but will fall downwards). In order to keep opening of nozzel free from overpressure, here at area of turbine vanes (TS), as an example, core of vortice is installed as solid body (analog to previous picture EV DLWT 43 at G, somekind shape like signalling-whistle).
Potential-Twist-Resonanz-Turbine
Much easier construction is, when rotor is shaped as plane disk and resonance-chamber is arranged directly within water tank. Rotor then is beared well, while centrifugal forces empty turbine vanes automatically. Distance between inlet and nozzles is short, demanded height for lifting water is minimum.
At EV DLWT 47 this concept is shown schematically, upside by cross-sectional view and below by longitudinal cross-sectional view. Within disk-shaped rotor (RO) here are drawn only four turbine vanes (TS), each showing radially towards outside. Water is guided downside-up to turbine vanes. At turbine vane right side, elements of inlet are drawn (however are installed at axial level below of rotor).
From this downside tank of water (WA), water flows through inlet (ZU) into resonance-chamber (RR), from there through nozzle (DÜ) into area of turbine vane (TS). At longitudinal cross-sectional view is marked, surface of water is only few millimeters below nozzles, so only minimum height for lifting water is demanded.
By turning of rotor, air within pressure-area (DL) is ´centrifugated´ from inside towards outside. So steadily air must also flow from outside towards inside. In order to differ these outward- and inward-flows of air, here a lid (DE, German Deckel) upside of rotor is drawn (fix installed as part of housing, however attatchment here is not drawn).
Area of turbine vanes (TS) here are extended towards inside and this hole is called inlet-channel (EK, German Einlaßkanal). Cross-section of this inlet-channel is decreasing towards inside. Upside of inlet-channel, at rotor is installed a wing (FL, German Flügel), practically working like vane of ventilator, moving air into inlet-channel and turbine vane area.
As absolute speed of rotor increases from inside to outside, within area of turbine vane (this long-stretched round opening) will come up potential-twist flow. An acceleratedly faster turning cylinder of air, within area of turbine vane is ´screwing´ towards outside (analog to essential effect, which is described in details at chapter Potential-Twist-Pump, sorry, only in German). By this turning flow of high speed alongside opening of nozzle, ´mouth´ of nozzle is well protected versus static air pressure.
At EV DLWT 48 inlet-channel (EK) and turbine vane (TS) are shown schematically by cross-sectional view. Rotor here moves from left to right.
At A, inner part of rotor is drawn with inlet-channel (EK) and its wing (FL) upside. There is initiated turning movement of air, which will go on turning through area of turbine vanes (TS), moving outwards.
At B schematically is marked area further outside at rotor. Inlet (ZU) is reaching into water tank (WA). Resonance-chamber (RR) and nozzle (DÜ) are fix installed within housing (GE). Water flows through area of turbine vane (TS) and outwards within this hole resp. within upward space between rotor and lid (DE).
This concept combines effective principle of shielding nozzle versus static pressure like usage of resonant swinging movement by most simple design at most small space (while naturally this rotor also is to construct with much larger radius and more inlets like turbine vanes). Effecting process of this autonomous working Resonance-Turbine in combination with this potential-twisting vortice is guarantee.
In addition, this system is to start very simple (opposite to previous constructions, like e.g. described in details at Pulsation-Turbine). In general, this system is working with over-pressure in area of air (instead e.g. by two bar, system could be driven by enormous high pressures). When starting system, rotor must be turned up, in order to create that cylindric potential-twist-flux within inlet-channel and turbine vanes. This twisting flux affects suction at opended nozzle, so water is pulled out of nozzle. As nozzle is opened and closed phasewise by turning rotor, within resonance-chamber comes up resonant swinging pressure waves, thus system by itself and automatically will go on speeding up.
Pressure-Buffer-Resonance-Turbine
At this picture EV DLWT 48 at C and D an other possibililty for ´clearing out´ area of turbine vanes is shown (which however will only work by exact coordination of wanted effects).
Instead of open inlet-channels above, here is drawn a closed buffer-area (PB, German Pufferbereich), which leads from turbine vane inwards (or even could show some upwards) and which is filled up by (compressed) air. Also turbine vane (TS) here in principle is only roud drilling, showing a slot-like opening only toward nozzle and outside this ´pipe´ is open.
At opened nozzle (like at D) water will flash into that pipe and at frontside walls of pipe will affect turning momentum. Same time, water within pipe will swerve towards outside and inside as well. Air within buffer-area thus is compressed.
If next phase, nozzle is closed, this compressed air can expand and move remaining water out of pipe towards outside of rotor. Flow coming up alongside opening towards nozzle, then will protect nozzle versus static air pressure (for next opening of nozzle).
At EV DLWT 49 this functional principle is shown schematical, upside by cross-sectional view and below by longitudinal cross-sectional view (analog to previous picture EV DLWT 47).
Construction of rotor is much simpler. As mentioned above, buffer-area also could show some inward-upward or whole rotor could be shaped by conus-like cross-section (instead of this flat disk drawn here). Thereby would be better guarantee, within buffer-area will exist ´bubble of air´. Nozzles could also show in other direction than radially. Naturally, also other details could be done other kind.
In principle, effect of resonance once more is used for producing flux alongside opening of nozzle, as this air-bubble is compressed and at the following by expansion resp. backstroke an outward-movement is achieved. Also this Pressure-Buffer-Resonance-Turbine in general would work, however both resonance movements must be coordinated exactely.
Productive Factor Organization
It´s mostly assumed, Perpetuum Mobile can´t work cause energy is to take off any source - and afterwards source is empty. Answer is simple: energy is not to take off anywhere in order to have usable energy at other place (or shape). There is plenty of energy, e.g. kinetic energy of ´wild´ molecular movements of strongly compressed air. It´s only question of organization, to generate usable energy of this inexhaustible source continuously.
In economics, since long times is common understanding, ´organization´ is decisive ´productional factor´. At the beginning of economics, as productional factors were defined only capital, soil and labour.
Capital funds by itself however are totally unproductive - and at the moment, whole economic system might tip over based on delusion, at ´finance-markets´ by itself could be produced any benefits. Global vagabonding funds are huge, so money no longer is tight good, so ´worthless´ indeed (if not one-sided spread like today). Capital funds only can be productive, if invested in productive goods (machines and other facilities, especially ´social´ ones resp. public sector).
Soil by itself is worthless, like labour by itself is worthless - if working is done without sense. So, it´s not a question of availability of productive factors, but for lasting benefits decisive question is senseful organization: when-what-with-which-and-how something is done. Only by expedient input of means and senseful methods any useful effect is to achieve.
Nothing else is matter of physics and technics: means are available resp. parts like processes are to design as we like it. Also energy is avialable unlimited, here e.g. practically only once is to produce pressured air, within which molecules interact on and on. These movements are unproductive - like senseless working. So analogly, these movements must be organized and ordered sensefully - and will become productive.
Order by Flux results Pressure-Differences
It´s mostly assumed, Perpetuum Mobile would have to consume any energy, e.g. heat is drawn off environment or dubious ´zero-point-energy´ is input. It´s always assumed, energy is only to transfere from one shape into other shape. That´s normal application, nevertheless rather unproductive process. One has to leave ´transformator-thinking´, cause besides possibility of consuming there is possibility of only using means.
Labour for example is ´transformed´ into money (by pay), money might be transformed into hammer (by buy), that hammer - no longer is transformed but is suitable for productive processes for hundred of years (by use).
Workload does each molecule of pressured air above, by pushing off other molecule. Cause molecules mutually push one versus other, this enormous workload is senseless and unproductive, only steady pressure in all directions results.
As soon however, alongside bended surface an area of suction is installed (by few or even null input of power, see my definitions of Perpetuum Mobile Fourth Kind), movements are ordered and differences of static pressures automatically result (and drive at sails resp. lift at wings are benefits). Sum of all energies is absolutely constant, movement of air e.g. is not reduced by any wind-energy-station (air movements are only some less directed like at original wind). So there is null energy consumed, but given energy is sensefully used.
Even ventilator vane above (FL at EV DLWT 47), at running mode doesn´t take any energy, but is only initiating direction of twist. Potential-twist-flux by itself is result of suction. So local differences of static pressures are done by null consumption of energies. At EV DLWT 50 effective forces one more are marked by symbols.
Within area of turbine vanes (TS) is produced twisting flux (F), by (nearby) null input of power. This ordered movements of molecules keeps off un-ordered movement (A, of normal molecular movements resp. static pressure) from opening of nozzle (G). On the other hand, static pressure (B) completely affects onto surface of water (WA). Based at this difference of pressures, water (E) runs off nozzles (and does senseful work by hitting onto frontside wall of turbine vane).
Order by Resonance results Pressure-Multiplication
Most fluid-machines are based at this unquestionable effect of ordered molecular movements, most fluid-machines however are only ´energy-transformators´. Opposite, at this website I already described dozens of autonomous energy-generators. At this resonance-turbines here however, first time a new aspect is involved: aspect of resonance. Partly this effect already was used at previous Backstroke- and Pulsation-Turbines, here however is realized by much better technics.
Also backstroke-effect is well known, e.g. by closing fast tap of water supply, hard bang will shock through whole water pipe system. Indeed, this bang-effect is most severe danger for any pipe system, e.g. mostly reason for bursted pipes within public water supply system.
No strong water flux is demanded, water tap is to open only a little bit, but is to close rapidly - and if this process is done by according rhythm, by resonance are build up enormous forces.
Grave difference between normal flow of water and this backstroke is, pressure wave runs by soundspeed through pipe system. Instead of some few meters each second (of water flow) are resulting speeds above hundred meters each second (of pressure wave within water). Correspondingly, kinetic energy of original movement is multiplied.
Instead of speed of technical flux, thus multiple speed of molecular movement (D) is affecting. At next opening of nozzle, water molecules fly by this high speed (E) out of nozzle into area of turbine vane (at least first molecules). Also flux following first front of water jet is faster than above differences of static pressures (B minus G) would result. So indeed, water molecules do ´workload´ sensefully by hitting onto frontside wall of vanes, thus producing turning momentum at rotor.
This aspect of using resonance in order to generate usable energy, probably I will have to describe and to define as ´Perpetuum Mobile of Fifth Kind´, cause in general, this kind of movement is valid at flux any kind (e.g. also at electromagnetic flux).
Double Leverage
By initiating sensefull flows, differences within static pressures are to achive. Like this e.g., maximum drive at sail is achieved, if direct pressure of given wind is only small part of driving power as a whole. So it´s well possible, by relative small power (of given wind) to result multiple usable power (based on normal static air pressure). This static pressure (B) opposite to reduced static pressure (G) here affects flow of water (C) through inlet (ZU), resonance-chamber (RR) and nozzle (DÜ).
Example of water tap above demands only few throughput of masses, to result vehement backstroke forces. Analogly here is demanded only ´splash of water´, to result backstroke by closing nozzle. At least two third of these forces are reflected (D) by backward wall of resonance-chamber, and next opening of nozzle can affect (E) onto frontside wall of turbine vanes. Again, there is demanded only few kinetic energy (of short water flux from water tank to turbine vane) to achieve much stronger forces (lastly onto rotor).
Multiplication of forces by backstroke is so strong, these turbines (e.g. that of EV DLWT 47) probably would work by normal air pressure (so without hermetic closed housing and without compressed air). Above this, reflection at backside wall of resonance-chamber could be improved, e.g. by valves. Naturally further details can be optimized.
In prinziple however, originally given forces here not at all are only transformed (consumed, in order to change only shape of energy of same amount). Given forces her however, by sensefull organization of movements processes, are used only as trigger, so much stronger forces (of molecular movements, lastly ether movements) can do effective work, thus usable energy really is produced.
At a whole, before and while and after this processes, not less nore more energy exists - given forces are only ´channeled´. Water of natural river looses potential energy of level (and corresondingly does workload by steady rebuilding riverbed) from source to mouth, no matter how it flows. If partly this river is channeled, water-energy-station can branch off usable energy (for senseful work at other places).
Exactely similar, here choatic molecular movements (within compressed air and water as well) for some distances resp. phases is ´channeled´ resp. ordered, so useful energy is produced. Molecular movement is not damaged, if phasewise senseless work of molecule´s steady hitting mutually is replaced by ordered and directed movements (compressed air alongside opening of nozzle and water molecules by synchonous swinging within resonance-chamber).
This kind of Perpetuum Mobile is based on given energies and only given forces movements are ordered resp. redirected by simple elements that kind, free usable energy becomes available. Using given source of energy and most simple means, by that productive factor of organization exclusively are achieved sensefull results.
At any workplace, ´surplus of value´ only is achieved by sensefull combining (based on organization as spiritual preliminary work), so product (machines or any other result of working) shows higher value (concerning wanted usage) than original elements involved. Just that´s original objectives of any technics - only concerning energy, physics voluntary hides in prison of ´closed systems´ with (wrong interpreted) constance.
Frustration or Inspiration
Decades ago, Viktor Schauberger did argument versus wrong usage of given forces. He described many qualitative effects and circuits of matter (not identical to chemical elements, nobody really understood up to now). He implored stopping of explosion-technology (burning fossile material) on account of implosion-technology (with priority of suction).
At his home-energy-station ´Repulsine´ (and diverse other constructions) besides suction (resp. fast flux), essential characteristics were twisted movements (within complex potential-twist-vortices), pulsating movement (resp. phasewise backstroke), but also areas of high pressure, thus all elements mentioned above. Besides other objectives, Schauberger wanted to achieve autonomous energy supply for everyone. Unfortunately he didn´t realize running energy generator resp. no running energy machine is known.
It´s frustrating, within seventy years no positive resonance (in shape of running machines) at Schauberger´s ideas came up. It´s frustrating, Rainer Schmieg with his ´Flux-controlled Resonanceturbine´ (which corresponds with Schauberger´s re-pulsating) since seven year got merely null resonance. Also my workouts and claims e.g. concerning Pneumatic-Waterturbine now are available at web since two years and - by my knowledge - nobody is really interested in arguments.
By constructional principles above, now I could present concept for really running autonomous system by integration of resonance resp. pulsation and pressure like pressure-differences with twisting movements. All effects are well known, here theoretically worked out clearly and transfered direct manner into most simple constructional elements (opposite to Schauberger´s like my earlier, rather complex designs). Again, I can demonstrate only principles of elements, processes and effects by these texts and drawings. Based on these knowledges, mechanical engineers by their special knowledges naturally could develope much better designs in short time.
It would be really inspiring, if it wouldn´t take once more seventy or seven or two years, until at least one man would be inspired for this clear technology - and would be able to realize corresponding machines. Shouldn´t times not be ready for Resonance-Energy-Generator analog to Schauberger´s Repulsine, based on better understandings much simpler constructed.
Evert / 08.12.2002