Starting point of all conciderations is real existence of an ether substance like many explorers do assume. Here, possibilities for movements of ether within ether shall be investigated. Motions of material occurances (like particles, atoms, molecules of gases or fluids) are easy to imagine: between parts there is space enough for moving one part alongside the other. Common view of ether also does assume ether to be devided into parcticles or quants, thus also there would exist gaps between, available for motions.
However, I wonder which kind of ´nothing´ these gaps will be, why ether-parts shouldn´t flow into these gaps, why parts should keep e.g. shape of spheres or vortex-rings. That´s why I do believe, this fifth element (quint-essence) called ether, opposite to all material occurances, must have property of un-dividability. By this point of view however problem will be, which kind of motions could exist within that gap-less medium at all. That´s subject of this chapter. Basic statements are summarized at chapter Ether-Motions inclusive basics of previous and following chapters.
At previous chapter Universal Ether-Motions whole universe was described to exist of this ether. Basic shape of motions are spiral tracks, in unlimited variations within spheral clusters, same time showing complete symmetry. Nevertheless these clusters are deformed different kind at different regions of universe, so merely no occurance will be uniform, e.g. concerning speed and direction of light. In general however, whole universe will swing resonantly at tracks of these spiral-clusters, here called universal ether motion.
Embedded within this micro-motions aree movements of larger scale, representing occurances of material particles or physical forces. Objectives of this chapter are to analyse possibilities of these motions more spacious. This subject will be continued by following chapter Flowing Ether-Motions.
Fixed or variable
At physics, thinking by solid bodies can only be a substitute within macroscopic relations. As soon as real essence of physical occurances are concerned, it´s appropriate to think only by motions. Sience of flux at best will do this, but even there it´s mostly calculted by formulas of averages. Movements of fluids and ether as well, may not be looked at to be constant in speed and dircetion, but highly variable.
Point of views by fixed processes at EVGRS 167 is symbolized by an assembly of circles resp. constant circled motions (A), inclusive these inavoidable gaps between. Honeycomb pattern (B) better could represent gap-less ether. A surface for example can also be covered by unregular hexagons (C). By dynamic view, these partly surfaces well could change shape.
Surfaces here are not drawn correctly and also no sensefull motion pattern is shown. Nevertheless this picture may show hugh variety of motion possibilities by flexible units, even units are gap-less one beside the other.
Motions all times will occure within threedimensional space. So here not only surfaces may be looked at, but units of volumes. At previous chapter, ether points were looked at, which do represent only an actual position within space. Additonally here volume-units will be looked at.
Variable Form
If for example, a cube-shaped volume-unit of ether would move within ether, ahead resistance will come up, effecting delay or redirection of motion. Often one can see screw-shaped motions within fluids, which do ´anticipate´ these redirections. A body thus will wind ahead through this medium by steady changing its shape. Rough sketch of EVGRS 168 will show this by cube-shaped units of volumes.
Upside at this picture, view top-down (A, blue) is shown, below a view to the front (B, red) is shown. At starting position (left) this body does show square top-surface, while its side-surface is a parallelogram of half height. If this side-surface should be spread downwards, top-surface same time should become smaller to keep same volume of that unit. This new top-surface parallelogram here e.g. will move ahead and sidewards.
Analogly this process could go on. Center point of this unit thus would show wavy line in horizontal and vertical directions, so at a whole this center point will show motion ahead screw-shaped. So even angular forms could change shape exclusivly by turnings, one including the other. If this motions channal wouldn´t be right-angled but of round cross-section (C), only turning movement ahead would be necessary.
Also this turning motion ahead would effect resistance in front and therefore will be redirected at a whole, e.g. bend-shaped. Correspondingly round pipe above, now at EVGRS 169 is curved to a 90-degree-bended pipe, upside showing horizontal cross sectional view, downside showing schematically a side view. Instead of volume-units, here again two ether-points (red and blue) are shown. Both points at starting position (A, left) will be quite outside of this bend.
Space available inside of central longitudinal axis (MA, middle axis) within a bend is much smaller than volume towards outside. So it can be assumed, turnings will occure around an axis (DA, German Drehachse) more outside. At any case, turnings around longitudinal axis won´t be constant all bended distance long, but in general will follow spiral track shown inside that bend here.
Bending demands bendings
Both points (A) here nearby horizontally will move alongside that bend, then slowly will turn downside-inwards (B), afterward will show relative strong curve upwards towards center. Middle-inside (C) motion will show nearby vertical upwards until it is bended again strongly (D) towards ahead. Lastly that curve outside will be redirected downwards by but small angle.
Already at Fluid-Technology was recommended, within Pipe Bends (but in German) fluid must turn around longitudinal axis, in order to keep laminar flux. Thereby, at material fluids, flow will become even a better one in shape of wanted potential-twist-flux.
Analog to this, un-dividable ether within any bending will demand additional bending around longitudinal axis of motion. Bendings might not be uniform or constant, but must occure on inward- and outward bended spiral tracks. Analog to these two points here, all neighbouring points ahead, behind or aside will move on parallel tracks.
All neighbouring points all time do show same direction to each other. No ´part´ of this ether will glide relative to an other, there is no ´friction´ within that flux, but only turnings around unlimited number of axis with most different radius and directions. So as soon as undividable ether will show a bended motion ahead, bending within bends will be necessary, resp. but these included bendings will effect friction-less process of motions.
Uneven surfaces
Sharp bending (e.g. like at B above) even could demand once more bending within bendings. Many scientists do suggest, there will be motions on spiral tracks and each section wouldn´t be ´straight´ but once more must be spiral, again and again by unlimited twistings. This must not be that way, however surfaces of that ´virtual pipe bend´ must not be looked at to be even.
At EVGRS 170 pipe above is shown by cross sectional view (A), with its middle longitudinal axis (MA) resp. assumed turning axis (DA). Four of these 90-degrees-bends are combined to a circled bend. Motions within will show shape of a ring vortex around central rotor axis (RA). Cross section of that virtual pipe however won´t be concentric (dotted circle at B), but will be deformed upside and downside (green uneven circle) at these areas of strong bendings.
One of these many turning axis e.g. will be that point moving ahead on longitudinal axis. Ether points upside and downside of it will swing ahead and back around that point, thus effecting stronger or smaller bendings and swellings mentioned above (small hills resp. hollows or knolls or nodes). These swellings won´t be concentric around cross section and whole ring as well, but will show ´swell-shaped´ patterns at ring surface (like marked at C).
This occurance is well known also at material stuff. Water coming out of a pipe or bottle with twist, won´t fall down by concentric and conic cylinder, but will show ´cable stitch´ pattern at surface (plainted, pigtailed). If water is turned fast, e.g. within a hyperbolic tumbler or a water-tomb, at center there is a small cylinder of air, showing strange nodes. A whirlwind won´t run straight upwards but will mostly show windings or even a kink. By all these motions of materia, same time ether will be in motion. Only ether with characteristics claimed here (and resulting kind of motions) can explain these occurances of materia.
Maximum bending
Picture EVGRS 169 above shows two consequences. The first concerns maximum degree of bending. Outside (A) at a flux (these two) points will move at a track nearby parallel to the bend. At the middle however, these points will move rather straight upwards, thus nearby parallel to rotor axis. So outside points practically will be side by side, at the middle points will be one above the other. Thus inside points will demand a circle section half as long as outside points.
Vice versa, a bend (or ring vortex resp. every bended ether flow) will demand an inner radius at least half as long as outer radius. This relation approximatly is shown by cross sectional view at picture EVGRS 170. Gap-less ether won´t allow any stronger bending.
Within ether, any straight motion will sonn become spiral and increasingly stronger bended inwards. Stronger bending however might not continue unlimited, but will come to a maximum. Afterwards motion must change to an other spiral track, at first at an opening curve.
Also this occurance is well known by material matter. A body falling free, within air or water, won´t move straight down nore by steady increasing speed. Opposite, that falling process is reported to look like tumbling down a winding staircase badly constructed. Explanation of that occurance will follow later.
Forces right-angled
Second consequence will result also by this (partly) drawing of an ether ring-vortex. If tangential motion outside of ring vortex would be accelerated, unavoidable a stronger motion inside the ring vortex will result. Kinetic power of that central motion does show nearby right-angled direction in relation to outside forces.
Vice versa, acceleration of central motion parallel to rotor axis, corresponding effect will show concerning motion resp. forces outside in nearby tangential direction. This occurance of right-angled effects is well known at electro-magnetic forces. This subject again will be discussed at following chapter.
Redirections
At EVGRS 171 spiral tracks are shown analog to previous chapter of universal ether motions. Within areas of spiral clusters there, much larger motions will be embedded, e.g. in form of ring vortices above. By these ring vortices was detected that in principle analog pattern of motions will result in shape of inwards- and outwards bending spiral tracks.
So as an example, these tracks shown here will represent central point of a larger volume unit, at A by a view top-down. First there is a motion within space rather straight ahead (black line). This motion will effect resistance, resulting some redirection into a bended track (blue curve). As discussed above, that track will be bended more and more to a curve strong bended (red curve).
At previous chapter was assumed, that kind of motion practically will damm up its further way by itself. Now we did learn ether does show maximum relation of bending. When this maximum is achieved, motion must run into other direction, here e.g. upwards like shown at B.
When neighbouring volume units are looked at, an other cause of that redirection will be evident. Sharp bending, to regions further outside will mean strong acceleration, theses volume units won´t be able to follow on and on. So these volume units will stay behind, thus building a new axis of turning.
By this new and that old axis will result a new center of actual turnings, which e.g. can be right-angled to previous dominating direction of motions. Radius of that new turning must be longer and even can be much more longer than the old one, so new motion will run in completly other direction, at first rather straight ahead.
Closed spiral tracks
This picture also shows motions running back to their starting points (C). Each motion must have counter-motions neighbouring (details below), so a motion practically can flow back within its own counter-flux. Comparable at material occurances is an accelerated flow besides a ship in backward direction. If a ship could turn fast enough, it could run back within counter-flow produced by itself.
Naturally closed circuits of motions could be build by several sections, e.g. by three as shown schematically at D. Above this, motion structures like this won´t stand static within space, but could turn around a central point, so motions would be done within an (imaginary) sphere.
A spiral track of three sections at EVGRS 172 is drawn within ring contours. Within this ring not whole volume would be in synchronous motion (as shown above), but only volume units along that track marked. This ring vortex, compared with above ring vortices, would show even stronger ´swellings´ (nopes).
At EVGRS 173 sections of spiral tracks are drawn within a circle, which same time could represent threedimensional shape of sphere. This picture is quite similar to spiral clusters, but here tracks are closed. While whole ether of universe will move on spiral-cluster-tracks of minimum ´space-quantum´ distances, whole volume unit (of much larger scale) will swing that kind. Each point within won´t move at infinite variations of universal ether motions, but all points here will move parallel to each others at that much larger spiral tracks, within limited number of tracks.
Units of different number of spiral tracks probably will show other characteristics towards outside. Especially these ´eyes´, i.e. areas of strong bendings would show effects towards outside. Units with prime numbered eyes probably are most stable ones.
So these units are ´islands´ within free ether, un-coupled off universal ether motions. They won´t take part in general vibrations of high frequences and small distances, but will swing more slowly at larger distances. That kind, these units will appeare separated, so one could talk about particles of material occurances. These local motion patterns of ether within (free) ether, also could be named ´bounded´ ether.
Of corse, this un-coupling demands existance of some intermediate layer balancing motions of different structures. This ´membrane´ will be concidered at the following. First however, an other essential aspect resulting of these pictures will be discussed.
Universal spin
Whenever some spiral tracks are closed, they will take up space of a ´virtual´ sphere or units may really be spheres. No matter which direction units like this are looked on, at their surface motions will show into same direction all time (as one can see by pictures above). So these units seem to have certain direction of turning, e.g. ´leftside-spin´.
Analog to this, also spiral clusters of free ether do show certain turning sence, mostly left-turning is assumed to exist within whole universe in general. So left-turning units will move relativly problem-free within universe. Nevertheless there may exist right-turning units too, however membranes above must fulfil more complex functions coordinating different motion structures.
Also ring vortices mentioned above do show certain turning sence, depending on direction of central motion parallel to rotor axis. Again there might be left- or right-turning vortices. Situation at these units rather flat resp. open at the center, in general will be quite different to situation of sphere shaped or closed units.
At open vortice units, one side will show centripetal movements and the other side centrifugal movements. Only one side thus may move conform to universal spin, while the other side will move counter general left-spin. So also separating membrane will be asymmetric und must serve highly different functions both sides.
Worms, rings, spheres
So in general is assumed, whole ether will show steady swinging motions at spiral tracks within a structure of clusters. At ideal case, cluster will have shape of a (virtual) sphere, however deformed at different regions of space. This universal ether motions will show only minimum distances, all points will move nearby parallel to each other.
Above was concidered, which kind of local motions could be possible, strictly keeping on characteristic of un-dividablity of ether. Instead of ether points also units of same volume but changing form were looked at. As a result, three different structures of motions will be possible in principle.
A volume unit might come along within space by wavy lines resp. threedimensional by screw shaped motion. At EVGRS 168, at first flat surfaces were concidered in shape of squares or parallelograms. Round forms however will be more realistic, like marked there at C. So process of motion that kind looks like a worm winding ahead.
Also vortice rings do show constant volume and unchanged shape in general. Motions within these units however will show into different directions and will be bended variously all time. Bending of flows can not be unlimited sharp, so vortice rings must keep certain relation of diameters. Surfaces won´t be even at all, but will show swellings or nopes, winded around the ring, also by pulsating motions. So vortice rings do show rather complex structure of motions, nevertheless will be rather stable units based on closed tracks.
A form rather stable and of volume rather constant will exist when ether points move within closed tracks, which as a whole do show shape of sphere. This volume of ether thus is un-coupled of universal motions, e.g. cause moving no longer ahead-back / ahead-back / ahead-back but moving ahead-ahead-ahead / back-back-back. Instead of minimum distances there will be spiral tracks of larger scale. Surfaces of spheres like this will seem to move circling or spirally turning, as an extreme will also move around an axis like a rotating sphere.
At the following now shall be considered, how these local motion patterns can be embedded into universal ether motions. At un-dividable ether there can not exist boundary-surfaces, at which points will glide alongside others. At commom view of world with its separated particles, motion (with friction) is no problem cause gaps are available. However, common view of world doesn´t explain kind of ´nothing´ of gaps and doesn´t really tell, why e.g. motions within atoms obviously are without any friction (versus general laws of physics). So here that problem of motions without any gaps must be solved. At first, sphere shaped units will be investigated, worms and vortice rings above will be discussed next chapter.
Fix and circling surfaces
At EVGRS 174 again flat surfaces mentioned above are investigated, upside a view from the side, below a view top-down. There is a fix surface (A, blue), which could represent ´resting´ ether of universal motions within space. The surface below (B, green) will be in motion, e.g. representing a part of surfaces of volume units above. A point of surface in motion (for example P) could swivel circle-like around a point of resting surface (for example around corresponding corner-point, blue point).
Line (C) between both points thus also will do a circling swivel motion, thus all points at this line will move at circle tracks too. Nearby resting surface radius will be small, towards moving surface radius of motions will steady enlarge.
Alongside this line thus small diameters of universal ether motions will be stretched to langer distances, until circle track of moving surface is achieved. Volume of ether moved that kind will be constant, each point at a downside layer will swing around a corresponding point of layer upside. All points of a layer will move parallel to each other, so will keep steady mutual contact. So this circling swivel motion can serve as a connection between ether resting within space and ether of local motions structure. This connection is possible, even here ether substance is considered to be steady connected, gap-less and without boundary surfaces. Above this, that motion mustn´t be concentric at all but could also show e.g. spiral tracks.
Swinging sphere
By these flat surfaces, naturally all neighbouring surfaces should have to move parallel to, so whole universe should have to swing that kind. However, no flat surface will practically exist. On the other hand, considerations above are well to transform e.g. to sphere shaped surfaces.
At EVGRS 175 a surface (B) in motion e.g. will be surface of a sphere, which will show circled or spiral motions as descibed above (cause whole sphere will swing around its center that kind, like and as a relative fix body).
Resting surface with its turning points (A) thus also should be shaped sphere-like (blue dotted circle). Between every point (e.g. point P) of moving surface and corresponding point of resting surface, a connecting line (C) again will exist. Along that line, points will move analogly, from inside towards outside by each smaller radius resp. smaller distances.
For example, motion (H) at spheres surface towards outside (G) will be reduced in distances, until lastly universal motion (F) will be achieved. Around an inner sphere (B) thus a concentric shell (D) will exist, reaching out to sphere of turning points (E). Within that shell distances of motion sections will decrease (from inside towards outside) continously.
Motions at surface of inner sphere must not be uniform at all, but could be spiral or even can reach outwards different size. A form with swellings (noped shaped) would effect movements of ´resting´ turning points, as marked schematically at K. Especially ´eyes´ mentioned above (resulting of changing spiral track inward to outward bends) would effect shifting movements of turning points at outer spheres surface.
Again, all points at surface of inner sphere would show parallel motions, i.e. all points will synchronously swivel around its corresponding turning points at surface of outer sphere. All swivel motions within concentric shell (D) will overlay to swaying motions as a whole.
Thus, within un-dividable ether can well exist connection between resting ether within space and local motions of ether within a relative fix sphere. That inner sphere one could name material particles or (atom-) ´nucleus´, embedded within a ´shell´ of balancing ether motions, this shell again embedded within free ether.
Rotating sphere
A ´swivel-conus´ (C) between a turning point and surface in motion, at EVGRS 176 upside is shown once more. Universal motion (F) must not be unrolled totally, like unfolded motion G does show. By these turnings however, track sections showing into turning sence directions are stretched, counter-directed sections are shorted. Resulting of will be ´garland-shaped´ tracks (H) as a whole. As mentioned above, motions like this of numerous turning points will overlay.
At extreme case of fix nucleus a body will rotate around an axis, e.g. like earth does. At surface of that sphere (B) ether will stick, so ether will rotate with the sphere. At pol-axis both sides, thus turning points (A) must exist, around which all ether points of each half of spheres surface will swivel. Distance between inner sphere (B) and turning points (A) will be rather large (much longer than drawn here), will show even ´astronomic´ relations.
Ether nearby equator does show highest relativ speed towards resting ether. In order to equalize differences, at equatorial direction are demanded especially long swivel-conus. Like swinging sphere above, also rotating spheres will show lots of turning points, building an elliptic sphere (E) as a whole. Within that balancing-shell (D) garland-shaped tracks above will overlay each others.
By previous descriptions of spiral tracks was mentioned, turning axis of these motions will ´tumble´ within space. Also here for equalisation of motions differences between rotating nucleus and resting ether, turning points within space must steadily change positions. At EVGRS 177 this process schematically is shown by cross sectional view, e.g. through equator of earth.
Wandering turning points
A sphere (B) will rotate as fix body and a point (P) at its surface will turn, here e.g. four times by 22.5 so 90 degrees as a whole. A point (N) of ether will stick at its surface and do same motion. However, this ether point will turn around a turning point (A) outside in space, same time same kind also all points along this radius. A point (M) further outside, thus will move some less distance.
As soon the inner point (N) did turn of 22.5 degrees (relative to spheres center), outer turning point will ´jump´ ahead correspondingly. Point (M) further outside thus will move less distance than point (N) nearby inner sphere. Naturally turning point (A) won´t jump but continuously wander alongside border between equalizing-shell (D) and resting ether (E).
A nucleus while rotating, thus will pull ether with its surface. This ether however won´t rotate like fix body at a fix radius around center, but will turn less and less by increasing distance to nucleus. If equalizing shell will be much larger than nucleus, well can exist total balance between central ´rough´ (or coarse) motions and outer ´calmness´ of finely spun universal motions.
In addition to wandering of turning points naturally will be demanded balancing of (minimum) turnings between neighbouring points. This is achieved by swivel-motions around turning points or by deformation of garland-shaped motions within equalizing shell within three dimensions. Additionally, all swivel motions neighbouring will overlay each other, from equatorial plane to pols axis.
Swivel overlays
At EVGRS 178 a rotating body (B) once more is shown. It´s easy to imagine, that ether points near equator will swivel around a turning point (A) at pol axis and all points within swivel conus (C) correspondingly. This idea however is still too mechanical viewed, cause motions within equalizing shell (D) and out to resting ether (E) are much more complex.
Overlays, related to a turning point (F) at equatorial plane, for example could effect a strongly bended swivel conus (G). Points (H) near surface of nucleus will move corresponding to inner sphere, but they won´t roll up neighbouring points (like a cable winch). Pulling neighbouring ether will result only various twists within equalizing shell, without ether being transported large distances. However, equalizing shell must be much langer than relations as this picture shows (up to ´astronomic´ scales).
Only if galaxies (like e.g. K and L) will come near to each other, spheres of influence will cross. Depending on directions of turning axis and mutual turning sence most different results will occure. Thereby real pulling of ether (S) might happen, as faszinating pictures of colloding galaxis show. Within that ether flux, indeed ´material masses´ will move towards stronger galaxis.
Moon, planet, ring, galaxis
Within each area of equalizing shell, (original) clusters of universal ether motion will be deformed different kind. Most ´croase-grained´ structures will be radial to most fast motion of nucleus. Each croaser structure does represent resistance to each finer structure. So it´s not surprising, croase materia like e.g. a moon will be nearby equatorial plane (resp. will move at ´swaying tracks´ corresponding to bended swivel conus above).
At picture EVGRS 176 above, a moon (M) is marked and a ring (R) at equatorial plane. Accumulation of croase pieces or chunks does show ring of Saturn at its best (analogly lenticular cross sections of most galaxis too). If there would exist centrifugal forces (and that materia would like to fly off tangentially), ´croase´ structure of equatorial swivel conus would effect correspondingly ´croase´ counter pressures.
These rings and all planets and all arms of galaxis don´t have any reason to move towards any other place in space. They all do just rest at local position of their ether surroundings, just do drift with turning motions of each larger equalizing shell. Planets do move well known kind, cause ether with properties claimed here does exist in reality.
Masses, inertia, attraction
There is no ´force of attraction´ between celestial bodies or between masses in general. Also ´saok up´ of materia by stronger galaxis (K) above has nothing to do with attraction forces. It´s just characteristic of un-dividable ether, every point of ether has to stick close to its neighbour. This property of ether will demand variously bended and twisted motions within equalizing shells around any nucleus. Only if a shell is narrowed down, motion structure within shell will change. This will also have effect to motions of nucleus and naturally to all material occurances drifting within that shell.
There are no masses, which could be more ´weighty´ or ´dense´ than others, cause all is made of same and unique ether. So at the center of galaxis there can´t be enormous ´heavy masses´, so no source of any forces of attraction.
There is no ´inertia inherent material masses´, which will force a motion to go on linear into same direction by same speed. Within un-dividable ether, there is only one indispensible fact: one point of ether must keep nearby neighbouring points.
There are only structures of ether motions, at the one hand universal motions in shape of spiral clusters with its ideal form of sphere or mostly deformed (called free ether), on the other hand more croase structures in shape of long stretched spiral tracks with an extreme of circled resp. rotating motions (called bounded ether). Besides this, there won´t be any straight line nore linear relation. All croase kinds of motions do demand equalizing shells towards areas of free ether. Whole system of nucleus plus shell could be named ´inert masses´.
There is no single point which could be moved other kind without wide spread re-design of motions. All existing motions within ether are without any friction. Every change of motions however will take time or will show resistance. This requirement of time and space for re-arrangement of motions within wide areas, that´s what could be named ´inertia´.
Masses in motion
Not all masses (i.e. volume units) do drift within ether but passivly, otherwise there wouldn´t be collisions of galaxis nore comets nore any parts in motion. Also big systems thus may move ´ahead´ within ether, e.g. body B above at picrure EVGRS 176. As marked there at K, thereto turning points must wander alongside sphere from ´bow to stern´. Here at EVGRS 179 is shown as an example, how a wing of an aeroplane will move through ether (and air).
Upside this wing (B) is shown by cross sectional view. Molecules of air can flow both sides of nose. If ether would be divided into parcels or quantums, it also could spread upside and downside that wing without any problem. In reality however there is an air stream (S), starting far below the nose, flowing upwards and alongside upper surface of wing, at the end of wing that flux is downwards directed.
As ether is un-dividable, it only can flow around the wing as a whole. By the nose in front an upward flux will be initialized, so ether at the backside has to flow downwards, below the wing it must flow foreward (C). Within that ether flux also ´croase´ ether structures of air-molecules will drift, so that picture of flow (by ´visible´ air) will result.
Ether will get out of way in upward directionn and the wing below will pass by. Below the wing however, ether must move foreward faster than the wing does. So air there is dammed up to higher density, thus lifting component will result. This effect however can only be explained, when ether is looked at to be real existing continuum, not dividable into quants nore any partly volumes.
At this picture downside, the aeroplane (B) is shown by cross sectional view. Ether flux around the wing, as discussed before, will demand additional swivel motion (C) around a turning point (A) far outsite. Also below and above the wings, even around whole aeroplane, thus an equalizing shell (D) must exist towards resting ether (E).
Planes are constructed for minimum resistance within the air. Nevertheless they produce enormous noise (even gliders), leave strongly and various twisted air behind, do react on control-motions rather ´strange´. This can only be explained by ether motions here discussed. Aeroplanes thus should be designed primarly for best kind of ether flows, like all vehicles, e.g. ships (see Fluid-Technology of this website).
Falling bodies
At all material bodies moving relativ to ether, this ether flux around the body is necessary. So this problem will also exist at bodies falling free downwards by gravity (pressed down by deformed spiral clusters) e.g. towards earth. This situation schematically is shown at EVGRS 180.
A sphere shaped body (B) does fall vertically downward. Like at example of wings above, air molecules (or water molecules) symmetrically could go aside (and quanted ether could analog), so that sphere could fall downward in straight line by steady increasing speed. In reality however, a free falling body will ´tumble down´ at strangly winded tracks by highly differing speed.
Reason of that occurance is, undividability of ether will demand circled motion (red circle with arrow) around the falling body. This rotating motion again will demand a swivel conus (C) around a turning point (A) resp. lots of overlayed motions within an equalizing shell (D) towards free ether (E).
As long as these motions within equalizing shell are not build up, that body will be hold within ´resting´ ether. It´s most astonishing, how ´long´ it takes free falling to show quick motions indeed. This process will be remarkable faster, if this body (before free falling) will turn around an axis (S) in vertical direction. As well known by ballistics, whole track of flight will be more stable and motions faster, no matter the body will move upwards, horizontal or downwards.
A body rotating will already have an equalizing shell, which must only be rearranged while falling. Motion of the body into turning axis direction will demand, that turning points (T) in front of the body have to wander alongside the shell towards outside. This is schematically shown at this picture downside by cross sectional view, where U does show outward motions in front of body, V does show turning points wandering back to center behind falling body.
This body here is marked with small diameter (green circle), the shell (blue dotted circle) much larger, cause these balancing motions will take much more space than the falling body by itself. The longer the falling distance will be, the more wide that equalizing shell will become. In general the shell will be enlarged, the longer any flight will take or any material body will move in linear direction.
A free falling body (without already rotating around vertical axis) thus will demand building up circled ether motion around the body inclusive corresponding motions within the equalizing shell. Only if turning axis at the very moment of starting will show (by chance) exactly vertical, then process of free falling could come true as assumed by theoretical physics (i.e. predicted without that twist necessary).
At all other cases (with starting axis not exactly vertical) the shell first built up won´t be ´optimal´, thus will force the body into a spiral track. This might even decelerate speed of body in vertical direction, thus equalizing shell must be rearranged, again and again. So not only that falling body will ´tumble down´ but much larger shell must change its structure continuously unregular kind. ´Workload´ of re-design will be done by gravity, however there is no linear relation between this force (nore material ´masses´) and acceleration resp. speed achieved.
This ´resistance´ counter gravity forces can also be explained by ´elasticity´ described at previous chapter. A pressure front (e.g. nucleus motions changing) can´t go straight ahead, but will be spread by counter pressures, thus will ´diffuse´. So it will take time until all related motions are coordinated with regard to new motion of nucleus. If however space for balancing motions will be limited, again quite other consequences will come up (as described at following chapter).
Summary
Subject of this chapter was to investigate, how separated ether volume units could move within universal ether motion. In principle these units could show three different structures of motion. At first there are screw-shaped winded units (here called worms), second there are torus-shaped units (vortice rings) and third there are swinging resp. rotating units (spheres).
In general, all motions will occure at spiral tracks, which however are longer stretched than universal spiral clusters, at extreme case to circled motions of rotating spheres. So these motions are more coarse forms of universal motions, these nucleus are like relativly fixed islands of bounded ether within free ether.
Each of these units will demand a sphere of equalizing motions, much larger than nucleus. So practically there will be a smooth transition from coarse-grained motions to fine spun motions. Each nucleus thus is embedded within an equalizing shell, that shell is embedded within free ether. Sphere shaped units by microscopic view could well be material occurance of atoms, by macroscopic view could represent celestial bodies.
Within un-dividable ether these nucleus can only exist with equalizing shells. On the other hand, diverse material occurances are only to explain, if ether is looked at to be real existing continuum. While every occurance is only a specific structure of motions of that unique ether substance, there can be no ´masses´ (more weighty or dense than others) nore ´forces of attraction´. There is also no ´intertia´ that kind, masses will keep constant speed and direction of motion. Only rearrangement of motions, especially within large equalizing shells, will take time and demand space or otherwise will effect resistance.
In general, all existing motions within ether are done without any friction, cause there is no gliding alongside anything, but exclusivly turning motions. Motions of ether will change continuously, resistance versus redesigns will only come up, if these changes won´t have time enough (e.g. at free falling) or won´t have space enough (e.g. at colloding galaxis). Both restrictions however will exist by commonly used technics, resulting processes with hugh losses of energy.
Following chapter Flowing ether motions will discuss these aspects. At first however there will be investigations about ´worms´ above (radiation), vortice rings (electromagnetic forces) and combinations of sphere shaped units (molecules) and interactions. Results will be new view of centrifugal forces, accummulation of clusters and lastly a process of continuous ´re-newal´ of materia.
Evert / 15.04.2001
| Ether-Continuum-Theory | Index / Sitemap | Menu |