Objectives
Most visitors of this site will well know ether conceptions of ´alternative physics´. Detailed descriptions to actual discussion about ether, gravity and inertia, are easy to find at the web, for example by external links here.
Before at next chapter Ether, Gravity and Inertia technical aspects will be discussed, here some general points of view will be talked about.
Elements
So it´s an open question, whether common model of atoms and particles, chemical elements and molecules, will correspond to reality at its best. It well could come true, these old elements will describe characteristics of reality much better. Ether by natural science was eliminated, partly replaced by term of ´field´. However, physicans don´t define fields - or must characterize by properties practically like these of ether.
Space
It´s unrealistic, to think space could be totally empty. Also impossible is to talk about energy of physical fields without talking about carrier of energy. If now, term of ´field´ would but be replaced by ´ether´, source and nature of it would rest undefined same kind. Opposite however, obvious characteristics of ether and its motion within space may allow to define space and time and some terms more.
Simplyfied one may say, at early times space was looked at to be filled up with ether. Today at alternative physics, ether commonly is defined as all-penetrading and causing-stuff and by its motion, finally space and time and fields of energy are generated.
Causality
Same kind of logic are statements like: ´by nothing, nothing may result´. Materialists concider none-material stuff to be nothing. At best, ´energy´ is allowed to exist like no-thing, but bound to materia, able to do work. Above this, energy might be bound to fields - but unlogically materialists won´t define material carrier of fields.
Same kind of logic, law of constance of energy will be, only allowing transfer of energy from one carrier to an other, also allowing to change kind of energy. However law does tell, when giving part did transfer its energy to a receiving part, giving part will show less powerful. Opposite to this for example permanent magnets do behave, showing power effects without loss of power. Also gravity for example, within a tower will press down all material stuff onto each floor. Thus also gravity power will not be weakened - but might produce even more energy, as discussed below.
Time
So we have problems to follow motions of a rain-trop rolling down a window - cause it won´t roll down like a wheel but will slide down by complex inner motion. We well know, e.g. waves at water surface, in reality will be circled motion within water. Again we try to imagine ´water-wheels´ one beside the other turning around. However, these diverse circle-motions are done same time same place.
So it seams, only our causal logic and slow brain need ´process-time´ in order to sort and group occurances one after the other. In reality, motions ahead-back-up-down-left-right may easily take place same time same location. Just this simultaneousness of motions will make difficult to register real character of waves, for example.
Particles
As all materia lastly will be ´only´ waves, so ether will be waves too. Again, we but can imagine ether to exist of especially small particles, so millions by millions will fit into one single atom. These particles, there won´t rest but move extreme manner. So it´s extrem probable, ´hard´ elements of materia will be nothing else but specially intensive vortices of ether. Special properties (chemical and physical, for example also electromagnetic) thus will only be based on special and different patterns of vortices. We also may imagine, these ether-particles would move much faster than material particles. We well know now, speed of light can be no longer non-plus-ultra.
Opposite to this, we well know occurances without any ´particles´ and without any demand of time. Nobody will become old, without his ´seventh sence´ did save his life at least one time. Whenever you are bound to an other person intensively, you will have the experiece of telepathy. Intuitive inspirations resp. no single idea you may create by mind (slowly and with efforts), it only may ´hit´ you by chance (suddenly and without any efforts). One only can re-flect or think-about an idea - one first got as a present. Above this, what happens at night´s dream, never-ever may fit to ´normal´ materia and time. Bio-chemicans will decode brain and genetic code and will find its design - but they mix up television-antenna and -receiver with content and sence of programs.
Waves
Image of waves again will be reduced to our mental (un-) abilities. We know waves at water surface, however essential occurance of wave will occure below surface. We know pictures of waves at oszillograph, but there waves are reduced to one dimension (plus time-demension). Automatically we think, only sinus-shaped waves are ´nice´ waves.
In general we must know, waves all times will be three-dimensional, waves are overlayed in much complex manner. When you imagine to knead dough, hands and fingers pressing into different directions with different speed and power, then you will have best impression of complex waves - if same time you are able to imagine, particles of dough are only representative for ´pure´ motions.
Pressure above is most important part of waves, might be the only property of waves. A wave will all times effect as (more or less) pressure, only by pressure any movement can be started. Suction does show only reduced pressure (or in extreme no existing pressure), suction however may never produce movement (only the higher pressure of counter-side, see article Why sails won´t pull - Warum das Segel nicht zieht - only available in German).
Pressure of waves may be static, as a rule will be periodical, where phenomena of resonance preferrably will bring to existance certain frequences. However, pressure-waves not at all must be regular, in sum may show dis-harmonic based on lots of overlays of (each by itself well structured) different vibrations.
Spiral
Practically, each wave-structure will be rolled-in. As soon as two pressure-fronts will meet not totally parallel, in-turning vortices are inavoidable. These pressure-fronts will go on, but in addition will release spiral movements. These rolled-in motions, towards outside will show like a common pressure-front, similar to a membrane resp. a unit differed towards outside.
When two of such vortice-structures will meet, once more in-rolling motions will result. This will go on and on until lastly very complex vortice-structures will exist, towards outside stable resp. ´hard´ seaming, thus will show properties of particles.
Density and heat
Pushing and shoving of material particles within a space-unit is called density. Transfered to immaterial waves, this term would describe the amount of waves pressures within a volume. Materia, at least at solid matter, does show a certain density. At immaterial waves however, density is even less determined than at material gases.
At materia, density and speed of motion do show the amount of heat. Correspondingly, also space filled up only by immaterial waves could be called cold or warm. If such waves do flow into an area, within that area the amount of motions will increase, thus will become ´warm´. So it´s not true, motions direction could only go from warm to cold.
On the other hand, amount of motions not at all must have effect towards outside, e.g. at rolled-in motions with membrane-effect above. Thus heat will not tell about total amount of motions, but will only figure out that part of motions with effect towards outside. Much more motion can be inside a vortice structure, e.g. if vortice structures will overlay, one including others. Pressure towards the large surface outside will be focussed towards a smaller surface inside (like onion skins). By multiple onion-skin vortice-structure, thus enormous pressures can exist inside, only a small part may have effect towards outside - thus determining heat.
So the term of heat should only be used concerning intensity of motions between atoms or molecules. An atomic nucleus does hold energy - but no one talks about ´heat´ in that case. Corresponding to this, ether doesn´t show heat, but diverse density of flux-pressures. Indeed, even density of ether isn´t density in common physical sence, for example would better be called ´pressure-potential´.
Energy
Existing physical fields of certain properties, so far will be ´immaterial´ waves, as their pressures represent energy resp. these waves will transport energy. However, these fields no longer are without any carrier - cause just these properties of fields, definition of ether might be.
As mentioned above, diverse waves may penetrade each other and will mutually impress each other structures. Partly pressure will be reduced by this overlays, partly will be inforced. Based on different vibrations-structures and angles of crossing as well, thus not at all plus-minus-null must result in sum. So assumption is allowed, pressures might increase in sum - thus surplus of energy may result.
Fine matter
So one might well talk about ´fine-matter´ units. Their ´materiality´ however will be far below that of real material particles. Essential property of materia will be to effect like ´masse´, cause its vortice-systems are relatively closed units. These systems will no longer be able to penetrate each other, so their possibilities of external movements are reduced decisively.
Opposite to this, fine-matter-units are much more open, can penetrate each other and material particles as well. So fine matter practically is unlimited to move, will not be stopped by collisions or friction, thus their speed really won´t be reduced.
Fine-matter-units, at the one hand are stable vortice-structures, on the other hand will intake virbration-patterns of others and will spread their pattern to others as well. So these units are storage and carrier of informations.
Above this, fine-matter vortice structures, based on their internal movements will show as relatively closed units of energy. By their property to accept further motions, they are storages of energy, may carry energy and transmit energy as well.
Both qualities of fine matter, information-transfer (by high speed, nearby timeless) and transmision of energy (preferably life-energy), to all spiritual humans are matter of fact. Same kind, physical fields will use or consist of fine-matter-units. Different kind of technical energy will be represented by each special kind of vortice-structures.
Spiritual
Fine matter, at the one hand will be storage or carrier of energy, on the other hand these patterns of vibrations represent informations. Within even smallest atom, practically unlimited room will be for fine matter, thus much more capacity of information than: ´I am an atom´.
So in spiritual sence no doubt will be, each atom will content ´self-confidence´ and much more capacity of spiritual or mental kind. It´s nonsence, that natural science excludes terms like self-confidence, soul and spirit or does believe it bound to material matter.
Only brain does concern occurances of material world - and will handle much unsufficient and unreasonable. Based on its unreliability and slowness, brain really might be bound to materia. All spiritual or mental capacities however, will be bound or stored at fine matter, will be generated and handled there. A spiritual unit may identify itself with a material unit, nevertheless whole immaterial ´world´ is generally open for spirit and soul.
Practically everyone will take informations from ´morphogenetic fields´ of most diverse kind, depending on which subject its spiritual focus will be directed. Above this, there are lots of people who may go ´out-of-body´ as they like it, normal ones only by dreams.
Some look at themselves to be only an assembly of materia with ntohing but chemical reactions. Others are conscious of their soul and feel solidarity with all living units. Then, same time one well will know this relation never ever will be bound resp. reduced to material stuff. So, by brain and feelings, necessarily must exist immaterial world. Above this, we might be able to realize sence of our actual life. However, if one is bound only to materia, one won´t be able to realize this logical cause of immaterial existence.
Starting point of these conciderations was - but hard to imagine - existence of immaterial waves. Resulting fine-matter vortice-units are ´billard-balls´ of immaterial world, so we may better understand in analogy to our experiences in material world. However, these fine-matter structures of ether may not be mixed up with ´particles´, cause they won´t have shape of ´hard´ matter with correspondingly reduced motion-speed and restricted communication-capacity.
So, comparison of material particles with billiard-balls may be helpful. Opposite, fine matter resp. free ether are immaterial existences, which can not be illustrated by material occurances. These ´old´ elements of air, water, fire, earth do describe characteristics, while ether is called basic causal matter of all existing. So one has to distinguish between ether and (properties of) materia.
Counter-pressure
So it can be assumed, only by existance of many waves within a ´warm´ area of space, more complex vibration patterns can be generated. Again, these patterns will further be existing only when hold together by counter-pressure. That´s the essential function of membranes resp. shells of material particles.
Swinging patterns within shells may only go on to exist, if pressures at this border surface from outside and form inside will meet sychronously. Membranes like this, thus will but be build at those distances, corresponding with resonance of swinging patterns. On the other hand, thereby a certain automatism is given, producing only structures like this.
Shape of these units could be concentric spheres or ring-vortices, like shape of atoms or molecules probably will be. These membranes however must not look totally ´hard´ like material particles. Also more-fold including vortices of fine matter will show this function of protecting inside patterns of motion.
Phantom-body
So the message ´here is a solid body´ will run ahead the body in flux direction as a pressure front, effecting same time the flux will glide around that solid body. So immaterial wave, at least partly, will flow around the body, will build some cocoon around that unit.
After penetration of the body, immaterial waves will still show that impressed structure, until other events will overlay, weaken or erase that information. So one may assume, each atom or molecule and also every solid body will be enclosed within a ´phantom-body´ of fine matter (comparable with ´astral-bodies´ of living beings).
The phantom body will partly guide general ether flux around material bodies, building thus a constant structure. However inside the phantom body, also motion will exist, e.g. fine matter units will be exchanged continously. So, that phantom body will be re-newed all time.
Gravity
Oesterle numbered density of ether at earths surface by 1.08, some higher than water. Thus we are swimming within a sea of ether resp. even more correct, within a steady water-fall. Pressure of these waves are named gravity.
Many autors assume, celestial bodies do absorb ether, cause inside this ´free´ ether (more or less) is tranformed into materia. So celestrial bodies radiate less immaterial waves (or at least quite other kind) than they do take ether waves. As materia of earth thus will increase, earth will become larger, e.g. resulting continental drift.
By conciderations above, at incoming ether waves, turning or swinging of atoms will be impressed. When this will go on and on, original vibration of waves will be overlayed so much, practically to become a copy of atoms passed by. Finally that ether wave will show vibration pattern of atoms, thus will be transformed into materia.
Inertia
If the body will be accelerated, the real masse practically will be pulled out of its phantom body. It will demand energy to overcome that resistance called inertia - in reality to reorganize flux within and around the phantom body. After acceleration, phantom body will show other shape, corresponding to speed of material body in relation to ether flux in general.
Based on extreme capability of motion and reaction of immaterial waves, this phantom body won´t show any friction within ether waves. Inertia (passively) will keep speed and direction of a given motion. Even more correct will be, ether flux around phantom body will (actively) move it by same speed and same direction on and on.
Differences
Based on these conciderations for example will result, acceleration from stop will demand more energy than same amount of acceleration within movement. Above this, corresponding deceleration will demand once more higher energy resp. there will be a surplus of energy, when deceleration of body is organized to do work.
Above this, Wiedergut and Oesterle like other autors do point out, term of density should not be related to volume but to surface of bodies. Shape and volume of phantom bodies above do not primarly depend on masse of material body, but on shape and surface counter motion directions.
Continuous matter
Nevertheless, dividing can not go on and on, won´t make sence, cause things are not dividable at all. The more atomic nucleus are forced to be ´divided´, the less any ´parcels´ can be found. There will only remain any motion - of some stuff undividable, I do name ether.
Above this, shells of material matter may not be concidered to be absolutely ´hard´ covers, but ´soft´ membranes. No shell nore membrane nore grating can close an area totally. Opposite, it´s essential characteristic of such border surfaces, to hold back special stuff and to be transperent for other structures. So indeed, there might be no single unit totally isolated from all other stuff. There can only be units, separated only some special kind, for example like material units are.
There are no billiard-balls with hard cover, so it´s absolutely necessary to think, there must be pressure outside to keep units together. There mustn´t be a ´glue´ only to hold atomic nucleus together, but to stick together whole atom and molecules and material bodies at a whole. There is no ´cement´ nore any kind of suction. There must be counter-pressure, materia must be embedded into a continuous matter. As this matter isn´t divided into units like material characteristic, it logically must be called im-material - or just omnipresent ether.
So necessarily, inside and outside of materia must be immaterial existance resp. materia is only special occurance of that unique stuff. Opposite to material experiences, we mustn´t think this matter to be dividable. The only property of immaterial matter must be, it may swing and flow, twist and vibrate within itself, thus show some flexibilty. As mentioned above, common terms of density nore heat will really fit to ether. The only expression of ether will be to move and by motion to effect pressure to other areas of ether or ether vortice systems, some of are called materia.
We well know this occurance by ´natural´ experience, as we feel water or air flux like steady stuff, not devided into diverse units. Only natural science tells to think of divided particles - which in reality never ever can strictly exist. So why shouldn´t we imagine a matter unique, not to separate into parts, but continuously flowing, swinging, vibrating? We don´t have to believe any longer, the world being constructed by ´billiard-balls´. We just must really accept what menkind all times talked about: there is a unique essence all occurences are made of, among others some materia.
Ether, gravity and inertia
Evert / 20.01.2001
Statements briefly mentioned at chapter above, Ether theory, will here be discussed in detail. Ether-flux and -vortices are physical root cause of gravity and inertia, here intended for earning energy. Above this, ether probably will be carrier of all physical fields, so aspects described here may also concern other kind of energy.
The ´old´ elements, fire-water-air-earth and ether, for most modern people are terms passed-by, as ´chemical´ elements are well known now. However, just this system of chemical elements does show a lot of inconsistance. Wolfgang Wiedergut, for example, did design a (three-dimensional) matrix based at three basic forces (resp. characteristics and combinations of), which does show all properties of all chemical elements well arranged.
In early days, space was filled up by ether, since Einstein space in principle is only an empty three-dimensional system of coordinates. Space is bended and even thought to be four-dimensional space-time. However, it can´t be imagined a space absolutely empty. Oesterle (see external Links) does show reasonably, there might never exist any absolute stuff. At no time, there is a unconditioned Yes or No, nothing or all, but all times some more or less. As Oesterle arguments, most real existing stuff will be at ´golden middle´ of two (never really existing) poles.
In material world, we learn law of causality and hardly can avoid thinking this way. If there is a fact, thus corresponding consequence must follow. A cause, thus always shows like a condition, thus a question whether certain circumstances are given. If now - as mentioned above - at no single question an unconditioned Yes or No can be the answer, so this kind of reasoning may not fit reality in total.
Causality above will imply a before-after, thus a difference of time. By changes, we concluse time to passe by. We are bound to time as an expression of changes or movements. Nevertheless it´s difficult to grasp many movements same time, even to imagine ´chaotic´ movements.
We learned materia is made of molecules, these of atoms, these of elementary particles. Same time we know well, by itself there is no solid materia, lastly but waves, vortices, vibrations. On the other hand we hardly can imagine any-thing without thinking by any kind of particles in motion. As hard as we try to think about, only ´billiard-balls´ in motion and time we can imagine.
Experiences or ´phenomenas´ above, natural science strictly does ignore. Nevertheless, most ´hard´ and realistic experience to us are self-confidence and feelings. If only one single occurance will have happened, not to explain by material (properties) - and who will deny - then im-material must exist. So, here a ´particle-less´ occurance simply will be called ´wave´.
An extreme fast wave may overlay an extrem slow wave. Small vibrations may be bended by long vibrations. So practically, no vibration may swing around a straight axis and no wave will spread straight ahead. In nature, practically there doesn´t exist a straight line (nore exact circle), but only tracks at sections of narrow or wide, inward or outward turning spirals.
An essential property of immaterial waves will be, they take any pressure without delay, thus each wave can be carrier of modulations of each other wave-structure. Thereby waves walk one through the other, thus compared with material occurances, waves are much more pervious, flexible resp. ´liquid´. Nevertheless, after mutual penetration, both waves will be impressed with ´informations´ of each other resp. will leave roll-ups above.
Without doubt, amount of pressures of a wave (or wave-structure) does show amount of energy. Thus energy will be potential to start movements (of other wave-structures).
As mentioned above, there won´t be ´pure´ vibrations of immaterial waves, cause inevitable they must become rolled-in. These twisted vibrations well could be early stage of ´hard´ seaming units. Thus there will be a smooth transition from immaterial waves to material occurances.
Fine matter must show much smaller dimensions than coarse-grained matter. In principle, material matter will be no impenetrable barrier to fine matter. Nevertheless, shell of an atom or molecule or material body may be sheltered area for fine-matter virbration-patterns.
At the beginning was assumed, essential property of wave would be, to affect pressure resulting of movement. However, if there is no counter-pressure, no pressure can have effect. Then, vibration will run into ´emptyness´, into a ´cold´ area of space. So, a real swinging wave only can exist, when swinging-out will meet counter-pressure, thus swinging-back will be forced from other side.
Above this, around atoms or molecules or material bodies an ether flow will exist with flux-structure enclosing these units. Immaterial waves well are able to penetrate material units. On the other hand, motion-pattern of ´hard´ material units will be impressed at immaterial waves outside of this unit. Within the waves, this information will be spread practically timeless and free.
Immaterial waves will flow through whole space. Vibrations of these waves, as a rule won´t be symmetric, cause pressures won´t be spread regular. For example, planets will absorb waves rolling against, so planets do present only less counter-pressure. From surrounding areas, waves practically do fall onto and into planets, thus there will be high ´density´ at planets surface.
Inertia is no property ´inherent of masse´. Opposite, materia is surrounded by a cocoon of ether flux. If a body will stand still, that flux around the body will be stable, indeed that phantom body will keep the material body at its place.
The faster a body will move, the longer stretched ahead its phantom body will be resp. the larger into all directions. The higher the speed, the stronger flux around phantom body will be. These motions (not only that of material body) represent kinetic energy. If opposite, this body will be decelerated, so whole flux around and within phantom body will result resistance against that change of speed.
Within material world we learned e.g. to cut a rock into stones, mill stones to sand, finer and finer. By science we learned, materia can further be divided into molecules and atoms and nuclear parcels. If something is separable from other stuff, this we call materia.
Now, as these general conciderations about ether are done, next chapter Ether, gravity and inertia will discuss more technical aspects in order to use gravity and / or inertia for earning energy. Some points of view above will be detailed, some others in addition must be concidered, for example term of ´masse´.