At a discussion about inert and heavy mass in 1998, Felix Würth did show a simple experiment, everyone can test easily: take a letter scale and put a wight on it. When moving that letter scale downwards, long time very less wight will be shown. Then moving the letter scale upwards, remarkable high ´weight´ will be shown.
At EV CPS 01 that´s marked shematically: a weight (red circle, MP = mass point) does rest at a spring. That will show the normal weight of the mass (at A). Now, the bottom of the spring will be moved downwards, the spring will slacken (at B). A (seemingly) lower weight now will press towards the basis. On the other hand, now the basis is moved upwards, the spring (at C) will be pressed together. So that mass now will make high pressure towards the basis.
Acceleration vertical and horicontal
This will also be true, when this experimental arrangement same time will be moved horicontal, like at EV CPS 02 from left to right (A). That up-and-down of the springs basis, hereby shall be done along that curved line (AA), which practically will show a downward- and an upward-showing hill, in relation to the horicontal line (HL). At the downhill, the situation corresponds to B, at the upward-hillside to C. Analog to this, the mass left side will press towards the bottom by less weight, right side however with high pressure.
That will be valid even more, when the horicontal motion of the mass won´t be steady, but over the downhill will be accelerated (D) and at the upward-hill correspondingly will be decelerated (E). That pressure of the mass, a corresponding counter-pressure the basis will show, however but right-angles towards the un-straight bottom. At the downhill (at F), based at the small pressure (and the acceleration to the right too, like mentioned above), a but small pressure horicontal to the left will exist. On the other hand, at the upward hill (at G), based at the high pressure (and the deceleration caused by the upward-hill), a relativ high pressure-component horicontal to right side will exist. By that difference of pressures, the basis at a whole will show thrust to right side.
Acceleration of mass will cost power, corresponding to the weight. Stroke-motion corresponding to direction of gravity will find ´leight´ weight, stoke motion counter the direction of gravity however will find mass ´heavy´. Light weights can be accelerated easier. That is used when accelerating a pendulum (for exampla a swing or a bell): it will but make sence to invest power within the downward-phase.
Down-hill and up-hill within circle
At EV CPS 02 below, this experimental arrangement is thought to be bended to a circle. The horicontal line above (HL) thus concentric to the system axis (SA) will be a circle, which here is called cylinder (ZY). The above curve of down- and up-hill (AA) will also show a circle, which here is called excentric wall (EW), however concentricc to the excentric axis (EA). Like above, here also mass shall be moved alongside the excentric wall, here for example counter-clockwise. In relation to the system axis, the wall upside will show higher distances, that situation thus be comparable to the down-hill-situation. On the other hand, the wall below will guide the mass backwards and nearer towards the system axis, so pressures will be comparable to upward-hill above. Corresponding to the horicontal thust-component above, thus here the differences of pressures will result turning of the excentric wall around the system axis.
Gravity power and centrifugal forces
Both kinds of power are comparable: gravity will effect centripedal in radial direction toward the center of the earth, opposite centrifugal power effects centrifugal in radial direction off the center of a turning motion. Differences of weight above, thus will exist, when rotating mass will be moved from respectivly towards the center or rotation. Naturally, it´s prediction, mass must be within a turning motion, thus centrifugal power will exist. Analog to above, it also may but make sence to accelerate mass within the outward phase, when mass is ´light´ while flying in direction of centrifugal power.
That occurance of heavy and light mass, in principle Felix Würth did describe at his book, years ago. The approach of motions in principle, here at this website is used at diverse constructional designs. These concepts, leading to the crop-circle-maschines with multiple bearings included one within the other, partly makes difficult to see that effect in principle. At that Swivel-arm-maschine above however, that effect can be seen easily. Here now, an other variation shall be presented, which does show the principles above in direct manner, by simple design.
Instead of swivel-arms, here practically but spokes are used, mounted by mass and turning with the spokes and same time, moving strokwise in radial direction. A cross-sectional view and longitudinal-section-view as well, at EV CPS 03 is shown shematically.
Rotor-arm-spider
Power input (AN) will be done by a shaft, which will turn around the system axis (SA). At that shaft, rotor-arms (RT) are mounted fix, showing into radial directions. On every rotor-arm a rotor (RO) ist mounted that way, the rotor may be moved in radial direction. Thus, by input-shaft and rotor-arms, the rotor-mass will be moved turning around the system axis. On the other hand, the rotor-arms will function like slide-bearings in radial directions.
Rotor and excentric wall
Mass of rotor should be concentrated most outside, in order to achieve most strong centrifugal forces. Here, rotors are shaped like circle-segments. In sum, these segments must show less than 360 degrees.
Centrifugal force will push the rotor towards outside, where it will lay against the excentric wall (EW). The mechanical contact between rotor and excentric wall, here is called rotor-roller (RR), for example could be a ball bearing. Naturally, proportions could be others than at that general picture here, for example cylindrical bearings could be used, might be in front and at the back of the rotor.
The excentric wall, like in other designs here, will be a round hole within a circle-round cylinder (ZY). The center of that empty space the excentric axis (EA) will be called. Between excentric-axis and system-axis a distance will be, here called excentrity.
The cylinder will be mounted within a housing (GE), turnable around the system axis, here for example by a hollow shaft, at which the output (AB) will be available. Here, i.e. the input shaft is mounted turnable within that output hollow shaft.
Approach of motions and power effects
The approach of motions and resulting power effects, here at that website are described by diverse chapters. Also the experiment above does show essentials.
At the beginning, the mass will move at a circle track within the excentric wall, however by different speed at different phases. Based at asymmetric powers, the excentric wall will start to turn around the system axis, in the general turning direction. Thus, the mass will move at outwards and inwards bended spiral tracks. The mass above ground, further will be accelerated and decelerated by the input shaft resp. rotor arms. When the system did come up to it´s normal speed, the input does no more require power, but friction must be compensated.
Acceleration will occure at the outward-motion, when mass is ´light´. The tangente of the excentric wall then will show small angles, showing outside from each direction of inertia. Thus, the mass will effect but relativ small pressure towards that backward side (in relation to turning-direction) of the excentric wall. So, that situation will correspond to moving downward the letter-scale above.
At the outmost point of its track, the mass will show highest kinetic energy, which now will hit onto that spiral track, bending all times harder towards inside. Tangente of excentric wall now will show towards inside in relation to direction of inertia. Thus, the excentric wall will effect high counter-pressure versus inertia of mass. Looking vice versa, the frontside of the excentric wall thus will have much higher pressure (than the backside part of the wall). That phase, thus will correspond to moving upwards the letter-scale above.
Difference between pressures of both sides of excentric wall, will be free energy of that system. At the lever arm between system-axis and excentric-axis thus a thrust will be given, a momentum available at the cylinders hollow shaft.
Constructional variation ring-segments
An essential variation to rotor-rollers above at EV CPS 04 is shown, again but shematically. Mass of rotor, there is scaped like bended segments. Bending radius outside will correspond to the diameter of excentric wll. So the mass may slide alongside the excentric wall.
Instead of rotor-rollers, here a rotor-bearing (RL) is installed, practically a cross-bearing resp. a bearing with two axis crosswise. It will make sence to install that bearing at the mass-center of rotors. The rotor-arms will reach through that bearing, whereby the spokes motions will be transferred to the rotor-mass.
On the other hand, that bearing will show a shaft prarallel to sytem axis. The rotor will be turnable around that shaft, so the rocking motions in relation to direction of rotor-arm may be possible.
By that design, power of acceleration and deceleration are transferred well and also power of input and output are connected well.
At the system axis, at one axial level several effective masses can be installed, for example this ´eight-cylinder-motor´ like here. The input shaft and the cylinder as well, can be designed thus massive, without any problem some of these modules could also be installed side by side at diverse axial levels, each with rotor-arms in different directions. By simple technical parts, thus at a small volume relative much mass can be effective. Thus the output will show steady momentum.
Variation with rotor- and excenter-masses
One more variation is shown at EV CPS 05, again but shematically. Rotor arm (RT) here is shaped like a disk. In radial directions, within that disk are long hollows, which here are called rotor-bearings (RL). Within these hollow cylinders, effective mass (RM) within the rotor-arm can be mounted, movable in radial direction, like a slide bearing.
At the other hand, again effective mass (EM) will be shaped like ring-segments, which can slide within the excentric wall (EW). Nowe here, that mass is guided both sides within an excentric bearing (EL), which practically a hollow ring within the cylinder (ZY) will be.
Thus, the effective mass no more can fall inside the maschine (when stopped). So, the system axis may be installed horicontal or vertical or at any position.
Both masses, that one mounted within the rotor-arm and that one within the cylinder, are connected by a shaft. Around that shaft both parts may swing, in order to allow these rocking motions.
At EV CPS 06, into the picture of longitudinal-section above, a sideward view is shown. That picture, thus will look at the assembly of effective masses from outside. Within the rotor-arm (RT) for example, in radial directions could be installed drilling holes, which will be the bearing (RL) of the mass (RM) within the rotor-arm. Also that mass could be cylindrical shaped, so sliding within that cylindrical drill hole.
Parallel to system axis, that mass is connected by a shaft with the mass (EM), movable within the excentric wall (EW). By that shaft, practically these both parts of masses are screwed together. However, both masses must be moveable, in order to allow the rocking motions between both.
Above these veriations shown here, lots of possibilities will exist to realize technically the approach of motions discussed here. Also the scale of proportions here are but examples. So, there could be installed much more effective masses at much larger radius. Diverse other bearings could be designed to achieve the effects here shown.
Gear between input and output
The performance of that motor is based but at usage of inertia, thus but will depend on turning speed. Between input and output, a ´soft´ connection but exists. One element may move while the other is stopped. Thus that constructional design, same time will be a mechanical clutch respectivly will be an automatic gear same time. However, at the moment, that maschine will be used as a motor preferrably.
Depending on concrete construction, tests must show at which number of tunrs of the input which turns and which momentum the output will show. At the moment I guess, the input must turn some ten times faster than the turns at output are wanted. The input-power necessary (lastly but to compensate friction) will be ten to one percent of the power available at the output. So, the net output will be pure over-unit, totally free energy.
If that motor should show different performance, the input power must be controlled by electronics. On the other hand, if that motor should show all time same performance (for example as an electric power station), also a gear between input and output could guarantee the relation of turns necessary, direct kind without much control-features.
Direct realisation of criterias
At chapters above, five criterias were defined, in order to use inertia. By that design of this ´Centrifugal-Power-Spider´ here, these criterias are covered in most direct manner. That maschine thus does show the essential principles as they are:
An input must produce turning motion, so centrifugal forces may exist. Motions must show acceleration and deceleration and the effective mass must be excentrical, thus an effective resulting direction of all power-effects can be achieved. Kinetical energy will be won, when turning motions can be added vectorially by motions resulting of centrifugal power, so by centrifugal stroke motion in addition with accelerated rotation. That additional energy will be available at the output, whereby but the thrust-component of a centripedal stroke motion will be the usable part of free energy.
Source of energy
The usable power will result of inertia. Existance of inertia and thus of centrifugal power, here simply is assumed (like nobody at the moment may know the reasons of that power). Here no energy will be consumed nore transformed. That usage of inertia here, is but a question of organisation of motions: thus, not all power-components all time will add to null. Here, but the symmetry is broken, which normally at a wheel or simple rotor-systems will show.
Simply that design of asymmetric resp. excentric masses and motions are the source of free energy. This may look stange, but remember: electricity all times did exist in nature, it was just an organistional problem of parts and motions to make electric stuff running.