Physical phenomena
At Six-days, sport and show, power and condition, tactical calcule are very much in demand - and physical theory. These racers use a physical phenomena, Dr.Werner Klein did describe in 1998:

A ball A rolls down a ramp and thereby will be accelerated. Later on the ball rolls with constant speed at a plane track. Ball B will be started same kind, however, later on will run down a hill, and afterwards will run up a counter-hill, upwards to the level of the plane track of ball A. The result: when that blue ball B got into position C, the red ball A will only have reached position D. Both, afterwards will go on rolling with same speed and same distance.

Both balls do have same starting conditions and at the end, both will be at same level again, there showing also same speed. Both balls will reach the end of the track, so same work will be done. However, the blue ball earlier will be at the end, so that ball does show higher performance. Higher performance does demand higher input of energy - but where from did that ball take that additional energy?

The blue ball, rolling down the hill, will be accelerated by gravity and will show highest speed down at the valley. While climbing up the counter-hill, that speed will be reduced to the original speed. So, the average speed of the blue ball will be higher than the constant speed of the red ball. Even the blue one has to walk the longer way, it will be first at the finish.

So, gravity is the reason of that acceleration. Potential energy of level, by falling down will be transformed into kinetic energy - however, that higher kinetic energy will be back-transformed into potential energy of same starting level. So, there can´t remain any rest of ´free´ energy, without any doubt, theoretically-mathematically.

These balls by that simple experiment do show: a better performance, in spite of same conditions at the beginning and the end as well. Six-days-drivers may roll same kind:

Six-days-drivers
A red cyclist could always drive downside the track and thus would reach the finish at shortest distance.

A blue cyclist, at first could drive up to the top of the curve, then let himself fall down into the straight part of the track. Next curve, again he will drive up to the summet etc. etc.

Climbing upwards, he has not to do with pure muscle-power, but centrifugal force will take him upward. In addition, upwards-acceleration- plus inertia-component will show a longer resulting line, thus automatically will result higher speed (see Sling-Effekt and Addition of power and Trucker-example above).

The blue one, by sure will show higher speed in average. So the straight part of the track he will take in shorter time. Naturally the blue driver, in sum has to go longer distance. As the ball-experiment does show, it will pay to drive that discontinous manner - and at six-days-races that exciteing tactic often will have decisive effect.

Power-source Organisation
Source of that higher performance, nothing else but gravity can be. However, gravity does effect to all balls and all drivers and all stuff same kind. Decisive difference however will be, at one case gravity-force will be blocked by a counter-force (same value, opposite direction, by the even floor), at second case gravity-forces will be allowed to effect motion.

So, the question about sources of additional motion-energy (Free Energy) is not a question concerning the existance of effective power, but it´s simply a question of abstinence of a preventing (counter-) power.

Real earning of energy, thus will be a pure question of organisation: to design procedures that kind, a power may be allowed, to effect motion. Or, cause there are effective forces more than we need: to design procedures that kind, counter-effective forces may not hinder a motion.

This admitting resp. not hindering of motion, only must exits a short phase. Cause, as soon as motion or acceleration do exist, really usable - additional - kinetic energy will exist.

Special characteristic of that organisation of admitting power-to-be-effective resp. of eliminating the blockade of power-to-be-effective will be, that organisation not at all will cost additional energy, but that organisation may be purly ´passive´ - as this example will show: instead of an even track but a track with a ´valley´.

Using or wasting of that additional power, also will be a question of design, lastly a question of designing procedures of motions, here at this ball-experiment for example like this:

That higher speed in average, would be without any value, if the track would be longer correspondingly. When for example, the counter-ramp would be very flat, both balls at the end will run side by side. The advantage of higher speed thus would not be uses. That higher performance of the faster ball, oppositly could be used, for example as a thrust towards the track.

The red ball E running to position F does show the normal case. The additional energy would be used, when also the blue ball G, at same moment, would come into position H (corresponding to F). That will make necessary, the blue ball has to move upwards more slowly, for example while pushing the counter-ramp (I, now looked at to be moveable) ahead.

That rolling-upwards, into two components can be devided: a vertical component-upwards and a horizontal component-ahead. In principle, again the blockade against that thrust-force will be eliminated, as the counter-ramp is allowed to move. The movements-energy of that counter-ramp will be the usable, additional energy, created by admitting gravity - but a short time ago - to have effect. Energy in total, holy law of physicans, still will be constant, cause that system is an open one.

Mountain- / Valley-Biker
Imagine two bikers: A will drive at even track, B parallel at a hilly track. Both drive really fast, however they do work but that hard, air- and friction-resistance will be equalized.

B will win speed rolling downwards and lose that speed upwards, in average he will drive same speed like A. However, B does cause additonal force-effects: he will effect backward-pressure at the down-hill and will effect pressure-ahead at the upward-hill-side. Both pressures not at all are same: B practically will ´fly´ over the down-hill and ´crash´ into the upward-hill. In sum, B will push the earth ahead - while allowing gravity to show effect.

Physically ok or not-ok? Not totally, cause jet that picture is not quite correct. The biker B may not make speed by friction at the bottom, but should be accelerated upon the downhill and de-cellerated upon the upward-hill by a mechanisme from upside - as we will see later on.

Circle closed
If we bend to a circle the start and the end of that valley- and mountain-track, there will be a circle, exzentric within an other circle, a ´half-moon´ of that crop circle picture.

Within a circle, one can produce some kind of power similar to gravity, can produce centrifugal power as you like it, kinetical energy as much you want, depending but on speed resp. rpm. In addition, within a circle one can organize rotors and pendulums, excenters and tracks, admitting and hindering mechanism as we like it.

Even circle-form are basics, motions will walk along spiral tracks, bended inwards and outwards. All conciderations made above, still will be valid - even that system then will be a closed one.

Earning additional energy, then however, would no more be conform to pure dogma of phyicans. Imagine, the organized physic would allow, mind-blockades but short phases long to eliminate - creative thrust-power could become effective.

That crop circle will show, how kinetic energy may be used that kind. However, if that will come true, the additional mental effect much more importance would show.

Evert / 20.11.1999