In the science of flux diverse mathematical formulae have been developed, based on which the workings of both concrete machines and theoretical concepts can be calculated. The difference between practice and the reality is the loss of heat due to friction, that same effect which will lead to the death of our universe.

This viewpoint is disputed. All living organisms constantly develop new structures. Even 'dead' material forms structures, mostly of amorphous form and occasionally crystalline. Strangely these planar or straight line shapes, which occur is rarely in nature, are almost always used in mechanics. This has certain advantages for mechanics, but is a total contradiction of the natural structures of the fluids.

Fluids are liquid or gaseous and therefore have no stable shape or structure. However as soon as a fluid starts to move, structures are created. These structures are generally fleeting, but always have certain characteristics. Fluid particles never move in a linear fashion. All movements of fluids consist of the rolling in or out of a vortex, the vortex ideally forming a closed system.

The formation of structures by living organisms cannot be explained with the conventional scientific approach. The structural formation of solid material can be explained through the atomic model (insofar as the models used correspond to the reality). Flux theory on the other hand, relies primarily on mathematical formulae which only describe the end result. Alternatively the movements of fluids are describes as chaotic and therefore not capable of being analysed.

Fluids form structures with high durability and enormous energy e.g. in the shape of tornadoes. These ´potency vortices´ appear to be capable of generating kinetic energy. As explanation, we are offered the theory heat absorption from the environment or a special "vortex-energy" is postulated. These views will be decisively contradicted here.

All vortices and especially these potency vortices display a certain self-organisation effect. This effect can be explained with the known symptoms of flux. The apparent increase of energy demands no energy input, and is not the result of any special ´vortex-energy´. The effect is based exclusively in the structure of the movement processes.

The normal molecular movement of fluids is chaotic. In such vortices however the fluid particles have a high degree of order in their movements. The vectors of all molecular movements point in the same direction by majority. It is not a question of energy, so much as one of the shape and organisation of the movements. An enormous measure of kinetic energy is present in such vortices, and an extremely small amount of static energy. In tornadoes one finds an extremely high dynamic pressure and at the same time a very low static pressure.

In fluid mechanics every precaution is taken to avoid the formation of a vortex. The result is that turbulence always does occur and with it friction and corresponding loss of efficiency. To take just one example, it is in both theory an practice completely impossible to move fluid in a straight line through a straight pipe without turbulence occurring.

The only logical consequence of this can be that the movement processes of fluids in technical application must be organised on a way that corresponds with natural structure of fluid movements. In nature these structures are transient, because they are constantly subjected to new outside influences. In a technical system, the conditions could be so controlled, that the movement structures can be held thoroughly constant and stable.

It is now commonly understood that we have brought the ecology of this planet to the brink of destruction through our combustion of carbons. Many decades ago, Viktor Schauberger called this explosions technology in a more comprehensive sense the ´destroying or negative force´. His warning ´you're moving the wrong way´ was almost completely ignored for a long time, as was his reference to implosion as the ´creative force´.

Especially with the movement of fluids and movements within fluid, the law is recognised, that the resistance increases in exponential proportion to the force used. It is therefore nonsense to attempt to break this resistance by applying increased force. Suction is however the technical expression of implosion. Relatively little force is required to generate suction. With corresponding requirements e.g. a tornado, enormous power can be unleashed.

The purpose of this invention is therefore, to take up the inspiration and arguments of Schauberger, to explain theoretically the energy generated by implosions in moving fluids and to develop corresponding technical solutions from it. The result is completely new approaches for extraordinary effectiveness in many technical applications.