06.03. Ultra-Sound-Engine

Subjects
Basis of this chapter are considerations of construction of previous cone-motors. If liquids are used as working medium, preferably oil, sufficient performance is achieved by relative small machines. Usable energy results of latent given kinetic energy of normal molecular movements, which are transferred into ordered flows by suction-effects accompanied by self-acceleration-effects. These energies are usable external if transferred into turning momentum by blades of turbines. However there may not come up ´backwater´ into canal, so most suitable will be any ´free-jet-turbines´.

This means there are areas filled up with oil and there are additional areas filled up by air. That´s no problem for stationary machines, e.g. for power supply of any houses. Using these motors within vehicles however might not work at any conditions, as oil could swap around uncontrollably within machine. Aim of that chapter thus is conception of engine working exclusively with air as medium. That engine could work with shaft in horizontal like vertical direction resp. at any directions, without sealing problems.

Above this, additional possibilities for acceleration of flows are considered, demanding no energy input. For example is well known, flows within nozzles become faster with no resistance forces. Probably these nozzle-techniques finally can be applied also at machines working with liquid medium (which lastly are preferable solution).

Normal and Laval-Nozzles
Picture 06.03.01 shows two pipes (grey) by longitudinal cross-sectional view. At A fluid flows by given speed from left to right, at B pipe becomes more narrow and by known physical laws flow becomes accelerated. Afterward, fluid flows faster through pipe C (than at starting point A), however that acceleration did not demand corresponding external force.

Opposite, fluid flowing off thin pipe becomes slowed down within wider cross-sectional surface D, flow pressure decreases and static pressure increases, strange enough however not correspondingly. There comes up well known ´resistance´, so fluid at E within pipe of constant size now flows some slower. So decreasing cross-sections of pipes are neutral concerning fluid throughput, while increasing diameters of pipes are negative concerning fluid throughput, well known by many experiences.

P. de Laval and independent also E. Körting about 120 years ago experienced construction without that loss of throughput, but with lastly well accelerated output. That ´Laval-Nozzle´ schematic is sketched at this picture downside. Pipe diameter decreases until bottleneck and afterward diameter again increases to wider cross-section surface than ahead of nozzle. Walls must be curved smooth and should not open by more than ten degrees.

At convergent inlet area F flow moves slower than sound speed, at bottleneck G flow moves by sound-speed and within divergent area H flow becomes ultrasound fast - by certain conditions concerning speed, density and changes of cross-sectional surfaces. Nevertheless that astonishing effect is calculable by known formula - however effect occurs not based on mathematics (which name only generalized results) but effects are based on real movements of particles. I always try to explain such ´phenomena´ by simple models, most logic and plausible - at least for myself.

Model of molecular Movements
Picture 06.03.02 schematic shows movement processes of behaviour of fluid particles within previous pipes. Starting point is ´action-radius´ A of molecule, which moves from its actual position to any place of circle within one time-unit, pushed there by collision by average molecular speed. Continuously these collisions and movements into any direction of space occur within gases.

At B are drawn two molecules (red points) within pipe (grey), which representative for any motions here are moving only up and down. These particles thus wander from centre to wall (there drawn once more) and back. So this movement-pattern represents ´resting´ fluid.

At C this molecular movement is overlaid by motion ahead, i.e. these particles wander within pipe some forward (towards right) at zigzag-tracks. Naturally these particles still move into any directions, however in general just that distance forward, step by step. Molecular speed is unchanged, i.e. also distances each time-unit are unchanged. Already that simple model obviously shows, faster flows demand less diameter of pipes (if density and temperature etc. are unchanged). In addition, these particles hit less often towards pipe-wall and by inclined angles, so these particles affect less static pressure aside.

At D is shown typical movement-pattern of sound-speed. Fluid moves forward within space by e.g. 333 m/s (VS 333, dotted line), however molecules fly at these zigzag-ways by molecular speed of 470 m/s (VM 470). Naturally particles demand even smaller cross-sections and affect even less pressure aside and correspondingly stronger pressure of flow towards frontside.

Cross-Stroker and Free-Flyer
At E is drawn pipe (grey) becoming more narrow and movement-pattern within representing flow (like previous at C). At diagonal pipe wall molecules are rejected and return to centre more steep, every time more and more steep (like already any normal pipe is ´self-locking´, depending only on length of pipe). Molecules still move by likely speed within space, i.e. collisions now occur more frequent by shorter intervals. So fluid there should become more dense and static pressure should increase (opposite to common formula). This movement pattern occurs without any doubts and particles marked yellow here are called ´cross-strokers´.

However there must exist also other movement pattern, so real experiences of nozzle result. At F for example is shown situation of particles, which actually move (nearby) into longitudinal direction of pipe. If particles of similar directions collide, flow is not delayed. Particles fall out of nozzle into free space by speed nearby as fast as molecular movements, practically without resistance and without affecting pressures aside towards pipe wall. These particles are really ´valuable´ concerning throughput, because they leave gaps at their original places and never return. So these particles marked blue here are called ´free-flyers´, thus opposite pattern of previous cross-strokers.

Stationars and Racers
Special case of particles flying similar directions is sketched at G. Particles of gases fly by certain speed only as an average, e.g. by previous 470 m/s of air. Speeds however differ and spreading of speeds is assumed bell-like, by Gauß-spreading. So if particles of similar directions meet, often will occur ´rear-end-collisions´, i.e. a faster particle transmits its speed onto a previously slower particles some ahead, and original fast particle now remains (nearby) stationary within space resp. is pushed back or aside only little bit.

This movement pattern here is called ´stationars´ and these particles are ´valuable´ concerning throughput as present relative high speed is forwarded practically without resistance, so here at outlet of nozzle represents rather fast ´free-flyer´. Opposite, remaining particle resting relative calm within space (previous ´stationar´, marked white) does not show much resistance for further collisions, by that meaning that particle is rather ´light´ i.e. is easy to accelerated again in any direction.

At H now is sketched combination of previous movement pattern with special importance, especially concerning Laval-nozzle. Two cross-strokers (yellow) occasionally meet same moment onto a stationar (white) and both transfer their kinetic energy onto that ´light´ particle. Both contribute their normal molecular speed and thus accelerate that ´third´ not only ultra-sound-fast but ´ultra-molecular-fast´ (thus up to maximum of 2*470 = 940 m/s). Both original particles are rejected only little bit resp. at extreme case by themselves become ´resting´ stationars, while third particle - here called ´racer´ and marked dark-blue - flies off correspondingly faster.

Naturally these racers won´t fly direct into longitudinal direction of pipe, so flow as a whole moves ahead not by double molecular speed. However that movement pattern is exclusive cause for ultrasound-fast flow of previous Laval-nozzle. At outlet of Laval-nozzle, diameter of pipe increases, practically protecting these racers from collisions of neighbours aside. At the other hand, angles of opening must be relative small, so within that super-fast flow collisions occur only by similar directions or previous rear-end-collisions. Above this, increased volume now is available with corresponding decreased density, i.e. particles have good chance to move long distances without resistance, so at a whole that super-fast flow really got generated.

Movement Mixture
So flow at decreasing diameter of pipe does not anyhow ´run through the gears´ according to common formula. Already within normal flow molecular movements speed differs quit a lot, however within nozzles motion pattern differ much stronger (while common formula simply work with averages of density, flow- and sound- and molecular-speeds).

Trigger of acceleration effect is reduction of cross-sectional surface (smooth and flow-conform), resulting at first increased density and pressure, so distances between collisions become shorter resp. more collisions occur. Irrespective of, some particles fly direct through bottleneck, also bundles of particles into similar directions, so relative nearby each other or nearby parallel without negative collisions. Thus molecular speed becomes passed-through at direct tracks towards outlet. Especially by ´rear-end-collisions´ all times most fast speed is transferred forward. At the other hand that kind of collision results particles which nearby remain resting in space, i.e. affecting few resistance for neighbours and following collisions. Just these ´stationars´ decisively are accelerated by ´twin-collisions´.

These multiple-collisions naturally occur also by normal conditions within resting fluid and result that normal-spreading of actual molecular speeds. Here within bottleneck areas of nozzles these multiple-collisions occur more frequent. As here normal molecular movement is overlaid by general forward-motion of flow, these collisions prevailingly occur with forward-showing vectors. So that speed-diversification (previous Gauß-spreading) now does not occur into all directions likely, but prevailingly into flow direction.

Within that mixture of ´stationar, cross-stroker, free-flyer and racer´ thus actual speed is most different, e.g. these four particles move ahead by 0, 0, 470 and 940 m/s, average some 350 m/s, thus by sound-speed through bottleneck of nozzle - no matter how fast flow did run originally. So acceleration is not based on starting speed and/or any input of forces. That self-acceleration however exclusively is based on transformation of characteristic movement-pattern. Strange enough, in front of outlet prevailingly cross-strokers exist and stationars ´hang around´ nearby resting, while from outlet into free area these free-flyers with normal or increased molecular speed dominate or even these racers up to double molecular speed, thus as a whole by ultrasound-speed.

Naturally, some readers doubt whether these simple models of movement pattern can really explain that phenomenon. That movement pattern of multiple-collision for example analogue is exclusive cause for any evaporation, where particles even are kicked out of liquid compound. That process is most important because without evaporation of sea-water no clouds would come up, no rain and no water and no living being at land could exist.

Overlaid Movement Pattern
Naturally previous basic movement pattern are extremely simplified. Naturally there are not only some few molecules flying around within pipe, but huge number of particles move that kind simultaneously. Naturally one particle does not fly drawn distances at one stroke but speeds and directions are exchanged resp. forwarded at each collision of many involved partners.

Nevertheless these movement processes affect also at macroscopic level and even without stabile pipe-walls. Picture 06.03.03 left side for example shows water-vortex with its typical bended tornado-trunk, which also might show knots, even with rather abrupt change of directions or trunk as a whole is ´tumbling around´. Trigger might be any irregularity of environmental static pressure, so trunk moves into that area of relative void. Air becomes dammed-up and contrary pressure practically now works like wall of decreasing diameter of previous pipe. Corresponding acceleration occurs and pressure area plus trunk wander into an other direction, mostly at circles.

At this picture right side is shown typical ´braid´ of water-vortex. One knows likely netting e.g. hair-pigtails or leather-whips or wire-meshes, however one can hardly imagine construction of that water-vortices-network. Previous solid materials allow certain combinations, however most different are abilities of fluids by including different movements within general flow. At fluids, these ´ropes´ must not stand one aside the other but flow-threads can overlay, penetrate, merge and pass over. Certain movement pattern suddenly become dominant, e.g. here building these outer swellings and short time later changing direction abruptly (and that picture is rather coarse while real vortices surfaces are overlaid multiply by fractal movement pattern). Flows press bumps into surrounding waters and afterward are pushed back resp. flow back to centre by suction of faster flows inside.

Potentialvortexcloud
This animation could be cross-sectional and longitudinal cross-sectional view through previous water-trunks. However these pictures show sphere-like structure and that basic movement pattern of ´potential-vortices-cloud´ e.g. could represent real idea also of an atom (basics see part 03 of ´Ether-Physics´, details of atoms will be describe at much later parts). Atoms have no solid nucleus of huge mass and no solid parts fly around as electrons.

Existing as real matter only is ether and within ether exist vortices systems, naturally only movements only of ether only within ether (because besides ether nothing else really exists, even no No-thing). These clouds show strongest intensity of movements inside (misinterpreted as nucleus) and moving around are winded swinging motions (and their most striking areas are misinterpreted as electrons). Generally, movement intensity decreases towards outward until ´resting´ ether of environment. However there is no ´fix´ border, movement system e.g. reaches far outside of commonly named radius of atoms.

Previous considerations by model of billiard-balls thus is only usable as a substitute, e.g. because ´short-aside´ there means ´total-aside´. Real particles ´feel´ each other long before colliding. Mostly hit contrary movements, however within gapless ether no part can glide alongside an other part at any border-surface. Between contrary movements must come up balancing additional movements, these coarse movement pattern can not penetrate each other (like fine-matter appearances can), but push off each other. ´Particles´ escape into direction of less resistance - and no energy ever got lost.

It´s absolutely certain, collision of solid bodies (whether billiard-balls or atoms of conventional understanding) affect deformations and their swinging movements by parts get lost into surrounding nothing (of common understanding), thus inevitably losses of energies result (by common valid laws). It´s absolutely certain, electrons or particles of fluid continuously are moving within space (resp. ether of new understanding) - without energy losses. Only because ether is complete gapless substance, no motion can ever escape into ´nothing´. Only by that understanding of basics of all appearances real energy-constant exists (however not by common understanding of physics).

Source of Energy
That point of view is important for actual subject, as collisions between particles won´t occur like billiard-balls meet and are not as rare as collision between solid bodies are. Radius of atom-movement-clouds are much larger and thus collisions with more than two partner are much more frequent. Above this, these clouds must not hit absolutely same time, but also collision short time after previous collision affects ´abnormal´ results. If all times collisions with only two particles would occur, nothing would change, because all times directions and speeds would only be exchanges one-by-one. Only these three- or multiply-collisions result grave changes.

Especially important are previous ´stationars´ resp. vortex-clouds which momentary are relative stationary. If these particles collide with more than one partner within short time, their energies are transferred onto that actual ´inertia-less´ stationar - and only by that action results huge range of molecular speeds and especially within flow at nozzles, where differences show certain direction. There becomes generated not only ultra-sound- but ´ultra-molecular´-speeds. Remaining are these energy-delivering particles with few motion within space or even as stationars. However these are not negative for general flow, because via these ´light´ particles other movement intensities are shifted ahead without loss. So there is no ´source of additional energy´ producing that acceleration of flow within nozzles, there only occurs diversification of molecular speed - and strange enough slow particles ´hang-around´ at bottleneck and most fast particles exit outlet flying into free areas resp. opening spaces.

Danger and Warning
So atoms may not be imagined as billiard-balls but as swinging motion clusters of ether within ether. Outside of these clouds, ether is relative calm and thus represents strong ´static´ pressure. Towards inside of clouds, motion intensity increases, i.e. amplitudes of synchronous swinging movements become larger. Structure of that vortex-complex wanders through relative stationary ether, thus only that movement pattern moves within space, however no parts or ´ether-portions´. Such vortex-systems ´feel´ other ´vortex-clouds´ long before really meeting, however by further approach building progressive resistance and lastly rejecting each other totally elastic and without any loss of movement energies (because surrounding resting ether immediately compensates any deformations - absolutely strong, opposite to common assumed ´nothing of space´).

If however that meeting occurs too fast, e.g. if previous stationar got between too or even three cross-strokers, ether must carry out extreme fast balancing vortices in order to mediate diverse, even totally contrary movements. These ´vortex-shreds´ within ether then might fly off as ´radiations´ or might stick at surface of one collision partner as additional movement pattern. That process is called ´ionisation´, i.e. these atoms now have surfaces some different to general appearance (however structure of ´atom-surface´ again may not be imagines static but as continuous movements, thus also continuously with some irregularities).

Mazenauer and witness reported, there was clear ´smell of ozone´ and room was illuminated by ´ionic shine´ some moments before machine exploded. Similar appearances are told at other experiments with fast rotating systems. So once more I urgently warn, not to drive these machines without sufficient load and well controlled drive and/or well controlled fluid-throughput, even not to test machines without these control units. Sufficient performance is achieved already below sound-speed and engines may no drive such high revolutions uncontrolled emissions of most different kind might come up. At normal mode however, these machines turn around only some air or liquid and environment is not involved at all.

Acceleration-Nozzle
Now is to consider how that nozzle-acceleration-effect could be integrated at actual conception of cone-engines at its best. Picture 06.03.05 shows partial cross-sectional view through rotor B (red), canal C (light blue) an housing A (grey). All movements at this picture are assumed right-turning. Surface of housing is wave-shaped, so towards rotor come up bottlenecks, followed by wider cross-sectional areas of canal. Dimensions here are over-drawn, for description of typical movement pattern again previous ´billiard-symbols´ are used. Even nozzles here are build only by one sidewall and flat flows here are running around, previous nozzle-effect will work likely.

Here also exists movement pattern of particles flying unhindered through bottleneck, also many into similar directions and principle track of these ´free-flyers´ D (marked blue) is not hindered by bottlenecks. Advantageous are meetings of particles of similar directions if they show different speeds. Each faster speed is forwarded, while at the other hand ´stationars´ E (marked white) come up, which show relative less motion or even momentary are stationary within space.

At F now is shown, an external force well is given and affecting, purely passive as counter-pressure of housing-wall. However that force works negative to turning sense of system as these ´cross-strokers´ F (marked yellow) become delayed into flows general direction. At the other hand rotor is turning and particles sticking at its surface and cross-strokers G (marked yellow) hitting onto rotor are accelerated forward. So disadvantage of that ´one-side half-nozzle´ is balanced. Probably acceleration effect might even be stronger as total rotor surface affects that thrust at all bottlenecks, i.e. dam-up-situations are dispersed into forward direction.

Decisive for diversification of molecular speeds and thus increased throughput however are these double-collisions resp. here at H sketched collision of three cross-strokers (yellow) with one stationar (white). Resulting of is ´racer´ (dark blue) which now can run far distance within following wider space of less density. Acceleration once achieved, never will get lost but is forwarded from particle to next, increasing throughput also at following bottlenecks.

Wave-shaped Casing
Upside of picture 06.03.06 is shown longitudinal cross-sectional view through housing A (grey), rotor B (red) and canal C (blue) between. Canal becomes more narrow from downside upward, i.e. fluid here flows upward through machine. At this picture downside schematic is shown cross-sectional view, however three levels included: at centre is drawn canal of downside section with its short radius, further outside is drawn section at level D and quit outside is drawn canal at upper end E.

Previous ´half-side-nozzles´ are build between round surface of rotor and housing wall, which here however is not quite round but wave-shaped. These depressions and swellings are arranged vertical from downside up, so in turning sense of system these bottlenecks and wider areas exist all around. Differences probably should be only one tenth of canal width. At this picture eight ´nozzles´ are drawn, principle curvature however is only to see at wide canal (downside resp. central), as differences at narrow canal (upside resp. outside) are rather small.

Fluid turns within canal in turning sense of rotor, same time wandering from downside upward. So fluid moves diagonal through bottlenecks and wider areas. So nozzle-effect as a whole affects in diagonal direction upward-outward. Nozzles thus could be arranged also into diagonal directions, however much more difficult to construct. Opposite, diagonal flow across bottlenecks also comes up, if nozzles are arranged horizontal - and that solution is much easier constructed.

Step-shaped Bowl
That easy technique schematic is shown at picture 06.03.07. Inner wall of housing A is completely round and also rotor B is round. Cross-sectional surface of canal C becomes smaller from downside towards upward, now however not steady but practically by steps. Radius of housing wall thus not enlarges continuously but that ´bowl´ becomes wider some more or less. From downside upward thus are build bottlenecks and wider spaces, however not absolute but only relative to general reduced cross-sectional surface of canal from downside upward.

At this picture left side at canal C are drawn several of these ´steps´ and their ´amplitudes´ become smaller from downside upward. Right side, at canal D only one curvature schematic is drawn by larger scale, where curve by parts runs inside of normal surface (dotted line) representing bottleneck. At other parts that curve runs outside of that line representing enlarged area. Again, air moves through these bottlenecks diagonal upward. Particles accelerated there can fly long distances within following wider space of relative less density.

Likely acceleration effect naturally comes up also when fluid is used as working medium. However, after reduced cross-sectional surface no absolute enlargement may follow, because otherwise will come up increased resistance resp. loss of flow-energy. If liquids flow rather fast, also damages by cavitation could come up. At this picture is drawn canal E with corresponding curvature. Housing wall moves inward and thus building bottleneck, afterward however that curve runs parallel to normal angle of surface (dotted line), i.e. represents no absolute wider area.

This conception thus is usable for air like liquids as working medium. Nozzles should not be arranged diagonal, but axial (like first solution upside) resp. cross to system axis (advantageous previous solution). Fluid can roll resp. ´wind´ diagonal across bottlenecks, i.e. can move upward or aside as it likes. That´s especially advantageous for liquids, as by that movement pattern no losses based on enlarged areas come up and no danger of cavitation.

Exit cross or longitudinal
Instead of straight cone-shape, canal mostly will show some bended shape, like e.g. sketched at picture 06.03.08. Left side at this picture, canal C at first runs into axial direction and afterwards is bended into radial direction. From downside (resp. here right) towards upside (resp. here left) cross-sectional surface is reduced (see blue lines). Rotor thus shows round hyperbola-like contours and round housing wall is shaped analogue, so cross-sectional surface e.g. becomes half. At upper canal D again are shown ´nozzles´ running all around, where wave-shaped contour of housing build several bottlenecks.

Outlet is slot-shaped outside at most large diameter, where accelerated flow can be transferred into turning momentum by blades of turbine (here not drawn). This machine is rather wide construction and high revolutions might stress material by corresponding strong centrifugal forces. Above this, guiding back fluid to inlet again demands wide construction. So that conception prevailingly is advantageous for production of wide flat flows, e.g. for ´suction helicopters´ of previous chapters.

For engines more compact, conception right side at this picture might be advantageous, because here inlet and outlet are arranged in axial direction. Canal E is S-shaped, already starting out of inlet area F. Rotor reaches far inside of inlet area, also with some larger radius. Within inlet area, fluid in principle is moving in shape of ´rigid vortex´ (i.e. by same angles-speed, e.g. like any wheel). If rotor at centre moves faster, fluid is ´drawn´ towards centre and thus potential vortex comes up (i.e. with increasing angles-speeds from outside towards inside).

S-shaped curvature of canal E already represents some kind of nozzle, as relative narrow areas are build at positions where walls are bended less towards outside. At this picture upside, contour of canal G shows multiple ´S´, so wave- or meander-shaped curves result. Here walls differ multiple from straight cone-line, i.e. multiple relative bottlenecks resp. pressure sides come up, changing with relative wider areas (which again may not be absolute enlargements for liquid medium).

Construction
Previous canal E (simple S-shape) again is drawn at picture 06.03.09 as canal C (dark blue) between housing A (grey) and rotor B (red), combined with some additional constructional elements by principle arrangement.

Fluid exits left side at outlet into diagonal direction and is transferred into turning momentum by blades S of turbine T. That turbine could turn e.g. by half revolutions of rotor. At area of blades thus also speed of flow becomes half as fast. Correspondingly cross-sectional surfaces within blades should become double by spreading of walls by angles of maximum ten degrees (analogue to Laval-nozzle upside). Optimum revolutions of turbine probably are even less, for example only fourth part of rotor turning speed.

Behind turbine, fluid must flow off by corresponding speed, e.g. via pipe-bow or ´snail´ D (light blue) like sketched here schematic. Via transfer-canal E (light green) fluid again tangentially is guide into backflow-pipe F (blue). This pipe decreases so twist-flow within is accelerated and again differences of static pressures are used. Right side of that pipe, fluid throughput could be controlled e.g. by cone G (dark green) which is shiftable into longitudinal direction.

Transfer (green) again is guided tangentially out of snail G into snail of inlet area H (light blue). Here these snail-housings are drawn only schematic, while naturally their cross-sectional surfaces should decrease and increase correspondingly. For example, snail at inlet H as a whole should show less volume as snail at G, so each time suction effect of faster flows are used.

At inlet area of rotor, flow again should rotate by ´half revolution´, in order to allow previous discussed acceleration by increasingly faster turning of rotor surface at larger radius and nozzle-effects as well. Surplus of kinetic energy within canal C corresponds (gross) to usable turning momentum - reduced by transmission- and friction-losses at backflow of fluid and for drive of rotor.

Twins
Backflow of fluid is real problem at these machines, because at least liquids resist versus centripetal movements based on centrifugal forces. Above this occurs friction and thus heat-losses at walls of backflow. So at picture 06.03.10 an other solution is sketched.

Here are shown two cones mutually arranged bottom-up and fluid is guided by snail-housings to each other component. Fluid of outlet D of left turbine flows spiral into canal E and towards inlet of right cone, analogue fluid flows from right outlet F to left inlet G.

Distances from one component to next thus are rather short. Fluid pushes outward within snails based on centrifugal forces, so fluid flows off blades. At end of snails fluid is allowed to fly tangentially outward towards next component. At inlet areas exists suction, so fluid is dragged inward within snails becoming more narrow again. Circulation of flows is perfect because each component delivers just that volume other component demands.

Disadvantageous at that version might be mechanical gears more complex for drive of both rotors and for output of turbines. However these mechanical losses are balanced as this conception used kinetic energy of fluid at both ways.

Quads
Naturally such twins again could be installed by pairs and represent most powerful station. At picture 06.03.11 an other possibility is sketched, where mechanics of rotor-drive and turbine-gear is organized different kind.

For example are drawn four cones of rotors, all looking into likely direction. Fast flow at each output is gathered by each snail-housing D and guided tangentially towards inlet E of one central turbine T. Fluid is redirected downward by blades S and flow is decelerated so turning momentum is generated. At downside outlet F fluid again flows off spiral resp. is sucked in by inlet G of four rotor cones.

Separated arrangement of rotor- and turbine elements obviously is advantageous for optimising, assembly and maintenance. Also distances between components are rather flow-conform. Might be some turbulence problems are to solve at inlet of central turbine. This example however shows there are lots of solutions for that principle of movements in order to use these autonomous self-acceleration-effects of molecular latent kinetic energies.

Clear Conception
Previous constructions got rather complex, probably too much ´build around problems´, while only simple and ´pretty´ solutions are really good solutions. So now it´s necessary once more transferring essential effects most direct into constructional elements.

Basis of all considerations (at previous chapter) is, fast flows effect like suction towards neighbouring slower flows. Accelerated flows are generated if fluid is guided alongside surfaces turning steady faster. Cones turn by constant angles speed, however absolute speed increases at larger radius. Cone-shaped rotors offer relative large surface, while disk-shaped rotors show large speed-differences at short distances.

At picture 03.06.12 schematic is shown part of rotor B (red) in principle shape of disk. Fluid sticks at rotor and is accelerated only by that friction. Alongside rotor surface practically come up ´fluid-rings´ with increasing speeds from inside towards outside. Resulting of is flow moving radial outward, theoretical by likely speed, so fluid flows off diagonal. Corresponding to increasing speed, cross-sectional surface of canal C must decrease towards outside. Here for example inlet G at radius of 12 to 15 cm is 4.5 cm wide and thus surface of canal is about 400 cm^2. Outlet at radius of 30 cm is only 1.1 cm wide and thus cross-sectional surface is only half resp. about 200 cm^2.

Second basis of considerations is, fluid becomes accelerated within nozzles without resistance resp. without demanding external force. If that outlet jet is protected at area behind nozzle, even ultra-sound speed is achieved, again without external force, but only by transformation of movement pattern (like discussed upside at Laval-nozzle). Best effects are achieved by round nozzles, while here only flat canal is given between rotor B and stationary wall H (grey, fix connected with housing A).

Probably best effects within that canal are achieved, if both border-walls build bottlenecks likely. So here contour of rotor- like stationary-surface are build symmetric. Width of canal is reduced by steps, so here building e.g. three nozzles (dark blue) resp. bottlenecks. Real construction naturally must show smooth curvature. When using air as medium, cross-sectional surfaces behind bottlenecks could even become more wide, while liquid medium demands decreasing or constant surfaces (otherwise damages by cavitation could come up).

At blades S of turbine T (yellow) fluid is redirected and decelerated, thus cross-sectional surfaces must increase correspondingly. It´s very important, fluid flows off blades and no backwater affects into canal. Jet D may not exit direct into area of slow moving fluid. That flat jet should be protected from both sides by ring-shaped vortices E. If surfaces of housing or rotor there are shaped correspondingly, these ring-vortices come up automatic and turn continuously. These additional movements affect no delay but bear that fluid jet into area of slower moving fluid without resistance.

Optimum Construction
These three points of view are decisive for coming up of autonomous acceleration and usage of latent kinetic energy of fluid by these machines. At picture 03.06.13 schematic is drawn complete construction. Here for example, previous jet D through blades S is redirected downward. That ´redirection-nozzle´ reaches inside of tank area, so previous ring-vortices around jet come up.

Stationary wall H (grey, practically ring-shaped body) is fix connected with housing A by some beams E. Between these beams, fluid flows back to inlet F. Cross-sectional surfaces of that area should be rather wide, so fluid moves relative slow. Otherwise, liquid media would pull outward based on centrifugal forces and dam-up at outlet. At the other hand, fluid is sucked inward to inlet G.

That machine is to drive by air or water resp. oil. Circuit is closed, so machine can work at any position. Effects come up at its best, if construction is build rather flat and wide.

Without problems these movement processes are to organize and predicted effects by sure will come up. Practical question however is, which performance these machines can achieve. Theoretic again is clear, kinetic energy increases by square of speeds. Practical question however is, which throughput really is achieved. Again that depends on cross-sectional surfaces and logically wide-volume machines will show relative good performance.

Machine of picture 06.03.12 for example shows outlet at radius of 0.3 m with circumference of about 2 m and cross-sectional surface of 0.02 m^2. If rotor e.g. turns by 600 rpm and fluid moves half as fast, fluid will turn by 10 m/s. Throughput thus is 0.2 m^3/s resp. 200 kg water each second. If rotor drives some faster by e.g. 900 rpm, theoretic 300 kg water moves through outlets with 15 m/s. At turbine, again turning half speed, thus about 1 to 5 kW would be available.

Way of fluid again is about 2 m long while one turnaround, i.e. Fluid must turn around within canals five to ten times each second. Practical however that throughput is only to achieve by resistance-free flow off outlet (like e.g. sketched at picture 06.04.12) or unhindered flow at continuous smooth tracks (like e.g. at quads of picture 06.04.11) or by wider cross-sectional surfaces (e.g. an outlet of 400 cm^2 into axial direction, with half radius and double revolutions of rotor and turbine). So machines with diameter of 50 to 100 cm well could produce usable performance.

Hans Mazenauers machine turned up self-accelerating until self-destruction. That machine worked with several canals while at Cone-Motor likely movement processes occur within only one much wider canal. Like at Ultrasound-Motor, Viktor Schaubergers long stretched spiral waves of his ´Repulsine´ resulted Laval-nozzle-effect running form inside outward - until machine crashed off workshop roof - unfortunately not reproduced up to now. Richard Clem again worked with many narrow canals, probably with repulsion direct at rotor, however he managed to achieve continuous working mode, controllable probably by backflow-volume - and did drive his car with that engine. So today, by these movement principles, also running and effective machines must be constructed.

06.04. Suction- / Pressure-Blades

Implosion-Machines