It´s just two years ago when I published first three parts of Ether-Physics and -Philosophy at my website. At introduction-part were defined terms used, second part described Universal Ether-Movement and third part described principle of Local Ether-Movements.I got lots of mails and additional hints, exchanged ideas with some hundred readers. So I wanted to go on immediately with that ´hobby´ and to produce following parts. However, ´normal´ life sometimes offers tasks of absolute priority.
At website, all parts were available as downloads, also as print-files by pdf-format. However I learned by these discussions, complex relations and motion´s processes demand reading more easy. So in 2005 I published these three parts as book, in German and also translated in (my miserable) English. Editing ready for press demanded lots of time, however now these books are available at any place and for long time.
Jobs on the Side
I still correspond with many inventor-colleges, so all times some considerations and workouts must be done. Hints like these e.g. leaded to Richard Clem, who did drive his car with self-running fluid-motor. I analysed and defined principle of his technology and published that article as ´Auto-Motor resp. Autonomous working Suction-Turbine´.
Based on hints of Dr. Daudrich, once more I made up considerations to self-acceleration of vortices systems and described his ´Whirlwind-Powerstation´ resp. published diverse suggestions for improvement, e.g. to realise this motion principle also by small ´home-power-stations´. So these workouts concerning fluid-technology, once more were ´exercises´ for processes at vortex systems - even ether-movements are much more complicated vortices.
I really would still prefer pure mechanic working self-running motors as solution for energy-problems. Only these ´perpetuum mobile´ by sure would be without any negative side-effects. That´s why I still think about machines using inertia and gravity - i.e. these occurrences which lead me to subject of ether some years ago. With last workouts concerning ´Bessler-Wheel´ I really hope to show real good principles for these machines - and finally hope to leave this subject and now to concentrate completely at subject of ether again.
Electronics
Last years, occasionally I came across problems of electronics. I had great respect for all electric- and electronic-specialists because they have their jobs under control and produce most astonishing machines. Finally however I learned, really nobody knows anything about electromagnetism, practically everyone uses only some abstract models and formulas. Most processes well are to calculate, however essential nature e.g. of charge and flow etc. are really unknown.
Without any worries and without specific knowledge, once more I tried to contribute for some better understanding. For example, I am ´angry´ that William Hyde build an ´electrostatic motor´, running without any doubts and producing energy ten times stronger than input - und nobody rebuilds this machine. Probably this motor was too ´weather-sensitive´- like practically all processes of electrostatics.
So I designed ´Electro-Dynamo´, at which charges all times flow alongside of conductors (so e.g. humidity does not matter). This motor is based on well known properties of capacitors - however nobody ´buys´ this idea nor even wants to test this conception honestly.
Capacitors, coils and other electronic constructional elements, at certain conditions, show rather strange and inexplicable behaviour. At the other hand, incredible strong energies of all kind of electromagnetic radiations whirr though atmosphere. So it should be possible to earn energy by some skilful circuits. I made diverse suggestions for usage of these occurrences by ´Ether-Energy-Generators´ - and some elements really were interesting for some readers.
At corresponding chapters of my website I also described, which processes of ether in general produce these electromagnetic occurrences. At following parts of Ether-Physics I will describe problems of charge, current and effects of electromagnetism much more precise - in details by many chapters - and previous generators are redesigned once more - and hopefully will produce energy for free.
God and the World, Everything and Nothing
At first however, I must start once again from the very beginning. Reactions to published ideas showed where I did not explain facts clear enough or where readers could not follow line of thoughts. I had to learn how difficult it is to produce agreement about even simple terms. For example, I really try to describe real simple mechanic motions - however practically all critic readers argue all times with abstract terms, without direct relation to simple reality, e.g. instead of ´movement´ using ´forces´ or even more abstract empty-word of ´energy´.
As single absolute sure bases of all considerations I stated: there is Something (at picture 04.01.05 represented by blue circle surface). Opposite to Something (which really exists) is Nothing (not existing), here marked by ´not-colour´ black. For me it´s logic, a Nothing excludes any existence - however I had many discussions what ´real existence´ would mean - and if Nothing could not be also some relative-nothing - just like ´space of universe´ commonly is called ´vacuum´ - thus emptiness which is not quit empty - so talking at logic level of ´little-bit-pregnant´.
This blue surface e.g. could represent total Something which we call universe. Some critic readers urge, thus I also should have to name God as creator of universe - even I excluded this question clearly, because this question is beyond our horizon. I exclude this question concerning ´creator´ or ´constructor´ of universe, simply because men all times are creating or constructing - nevertheless this does not exclude other possibility for producing existence in general. Above this, no science can approve why lastly something exists. One can calculate backward - by fictive formula, based on questionable parameters - when universe became existing by big-bang - why and who or what however big-bang started and all questions concerning status before that explosion, still are without answer.
Other critic readers accuse me to ´materialize´ God as everything should exist of ether. I also made clear statement concerning this question: ether is medium of all occurrences and nothing else than medium. Everything we know as physical-material are (relative coarse) ether-movements and I am sure, everything we know as mental-spiritual are also represented by this medium (by essentially finer movements pattern). It well could be, God uses this medium - and medium thus might be morphogenetic for other occurrences - however medium rests medium and by itself nothing else (so never equal to God).
Pressure through Nothing
It´s open question whether total Something (whole universe) is finite or infinite, i.e. outer border must exist. I leave open also this question, however everyone has to think about most questionable conditions which are demanded for existence of an outer border. Such surface layers next to Nothing come up also at any ´twisted universe´ or additional ´parallel-universes´ or ´worm-holes´ and other hypothetic suggestions of different researchers - and none of produced convincing answer.
Problem of border between Something and Nothing (resp. what should be outside of Something) however exists not only at outer border of universe, but numberless times within universe and our world. Common science tells, not only universe is empty, but ´vacuum´ exists also between all parts. Sun-system or atoms, all times is assumed existence of a core (plus planets or electrons or something else) - and Nothing between. Here at picture 04.01.06 and at animation, any parts again are marked by blue colour and between of that Nothing is marked by black colour.
Whenever thinking by parts, inevitably come up gaps between - and common science eliminated ether to fill up this space. As a substitute that space is called ´vacuum´ and this relative emptiness is filled up by ´fields´ - which again is only abstract empty-word. Critics might argue, fields naturally are real and represent exact calculable forces. However, why and how forces of all fields should affect - is total open question.
In principle, there are only two forces of pushing or dragging affects. Fairly reasonable are affects of rejection (like sketched at pictures). Parts could show any ´radiation´ and its pressure could affect versus other parts thus enlarging distances between. If parts at their flight collide with other parts, also elastic push is reasonable by these mutual radiations.
By this ´radiations´ thus would come up mechanic effect between material particles - however how could ´pressure´ be transported, if not by likely ´material-mechanic´ means? Or in general, common understanding will finally be, any kind of radiation lastly is some motion - and any movement implies Something-in-motion - and ´vacuum´ by sure is too empty for, contains too less movable somethings - and ´fields´ are only abstract numbers and thus are nothing which could achieve real affects by themselves.
Certainly many specialists can explain affects of fields by many words, nevertheless all common analogism can not plausible explain, why these effects come up and can even less explain why some affects inevitably work by strange vectors. These ´phenomena´ are only to explain, if all spaces between are filled up not by - nearby empty - vacuum, but by real material ether.
Drag through Nothing
Long time ago, Newton recognized ´how apples fall from trees´ and by inertia- and gravity-forces he was able to calculate tracks of planets. He mentioned on and on, thus phenomenon of gravity is calculable however this occurrence does not imply any ´dragging force´. For example he wrote ´... a body affecting to an other body via distance through vacuum without mediation by some medium, for me is most great absurdity, so no man able to consider any philosophic question can really think about ...´. Nevertheless this mental picture of ´attracting forces´ became common understanding.
There were and are scientists who consider space to be filled up with fluid-like ether. Tracks of turning and rotating planets well could be explained by flux-technologic calculations.
Problem however exists in general as attraction can also affect between non-turning and non-rotating particles, e.g. between unlikely magnetic poles or charged particles. However, how should one imagine any ´attraction´ via Nothing? Sure, there are fields and forces to calculate, however this does not contribute to real explanation of essential processes.
At picture 04.01.08 and this animation are sketched three material parts (blue Somethings) swimming within Nothing (black emptiness). Parts should mutually get in touch anyhow, here symbolized by red ´feelers´. If these (magnetic) ´field-lines´ meet, they develop tendency to become shorter resp. to reduce distance between parts in general. How they produce that behaviour - still rests their secrete miracle.
As a substitute here are marked light-red fields between parts, within which attraction could occur. At the other hand this picture obviously suggests, between these parts could come up ´protected´ area and parts are not really dragging mutually - but are pressed together by any force from outside. As mentioned upside, idea of pressure-forces affecting from outside onto parts is much more plausible than any ´mysterious elastic rubber bands´ of dragging forces.
Indeed, some scientists suggest gravity resulting of pressure forces, however these theories describe properties of demanded medium rather different (or prefer not to define medium and properties at all). Unlike magnetic poles obviously seem to demonstrate attraction - however also magnetism could alternatively be explained by pressure forces. It´s common understanding, unlike stuff works attracting and likely stuff works rejecting - and it rests unexplained e.g. why likely charged particles of atomic nucleus should keep together unbelievable dense and strong (and no ´glue´ can explain sufficiently).
Naive and off the Mark
Certainly could be objected that previous pictures represent problems really naive. That´s correct - and corresponds in total with common science: it´s real naive belief these effects are result of fields or their affecting through Nothing. It´s really unbelievable how ´apathetic´ scientists neglect ´phenomena´, e.g. total contradictions of common understand of atoms. Again one could accuse me naivety because other solutions are available, e.g. by quant-theories - which same time however ascertain, processes are not to understand by ´common mind and experiences´. Physics may lastly end into pure spiritual questions - however rational researches must not end thus early.
Here it´s not previous spiritual question whether or why or how any God or any Spirit created universe. General problem of attracting or rejecting affects - via distances, thus via Nothing of vacuum - is basic question within material word, thus direct in front of door of all nature sciences. By this point of view, all suggestions of common explanations of main stream sciences indeed are unbelievable ´mysterious´.
This broad generalization naturally does not meet all positive achievements of nature sciences and techniques. Indeed, people without technical interest and knowledge can use many useful machines. One well can drive a car knowing function of only few parts. Nearby all technical tools demand basic knowledge of only few Somethings (E, German Etwas) in order to profit of performance of remaining ´black-box´ (BB). This disc at picture 04.01.10 visualizes e.g. relation of 5 percents knowledge and 95 percent ignorance.
For example this is actual status of knowledge at astronomic science: as known are assumed materia with their masses and inertia and weights, speed of light and its bending and red-shifting, physical forces e.g. of electric and magnetic nature, great number of so-called nature-constants, everything well calculated by well known formula. However, if calculations should fit to reality of total universe, missing are further 95 percent of ´unknown, dark, abnormal mass or energy´. Is this neglectable tiny ´mistake´ or clear case of ´totally missing the target´?
Ether, particle-less
This ´stuff unknown´ one could simply call old-fashioned ´ether´ - and re-define its properties by actual clear physical terms. There are missing ´masses´, so ether must be substantial matter. Previous relation well could fit, as All is ether and all ether is in motion - and only small part shows motion pattern resulting these physical occurrences, which we are used to measure, weight and count.
Indeed, discussions about ether came up by many physicists and explorers. My workouts concerning ether e.g. resulted questions and comments and hints all day long, by hundreds of emails. Many colleges ´agree in total´ - and next moment try to convince me by opposite positions. Many others think these ether-considerations are totally in vain, as Relativity- and Quant-Theories explain everything. Most people however did not really realize, ´my ether´ is part-less substance and thus totally different to common understanding. Up to now, practically nobody did really follow this idea of an absolute continuum, as nobody can imagine any motion within a gapless, solid, material substance (so I have to describe these necessities and possibilities at following chapters once more in details).
Present-days physics can not solve problems as long as being bound to thinking by particles and by affects between parts via Nothing. Further on: if this Nothing is replaced by ether - and that ether again is assumed to exist by particles - same unsolved problems are only placed at lower level.
So I am forced to ask this ´killer-question´ on and on: no matter which kind of particles, why should parts not disperse into emptiness, which inevitably exists between parts. What else could result than (at picture 04.01.11 grey) mixture of Nothing and Something? Existence resp. Non-Existence of Nothing and Something is mutually excluding, logical like physical. Thinking by parts implies prerequisites and affects - which physics up to now were not able to explain, but disregard these essential problems as ´phenomena´ resp. as neglectable side-aspects.
I did not receive any acceptable answer to previous question (of dispersion of parts into vacuum). As a substitute ´elastic-swinging´ ether or likely constructions are suggested, which however demand numberless additional prerequisites (which practically no author mentions precisely). For example, within particle-ether or elastic-ether could not exist real constant of all energies - all would end into ´heat death´, this grey stuff of previous picture.
Subject
Basic subject of these Ether-Physics thus is question, ´what world keeps together most inside´ - like Goethe´s Faust asks urgently. At following parts of workouts however, I will not discuss philosophic aspects, i.e. all ´mental-spiritual´ stuff is excluded and only pure physical questions are considered.
At first I will show once more, why problems of actual physics find ´reasonable´ answers only when ether is assumed to be general medium for all occurrences. I will define demanded properties really exact (predominating its gap-less-ness) and I will describe given possibilities resp. necessities of its motion pattern.
A ´magician´ designed this well known cube with its possibilities of movements into all three directions. Complex motions are necessary to produce optimum order. Above this, some might think about construction of ´inner gear´, which results cohesion of cube and nevertheless allows these possibilities for movements. Ether functions just like this - however totally opposite to.
| 04.02. Space-Time-Quant-Zero-Point-Energy | Ether-Physics and -Philosophy |